Larkin Celine, Sanseverino Alexandra M, Joseph James, Eisenhauer Lauren, Reznek Martin A
University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 27;2(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00182-1.
Audit and feedback (A&F) has been used as a strategy to modify clinician behavior with moderate success. Although A&F is theorized to work by improving the accuracy of clinicians' estimates of their own behavior, few interventions have included assessment of clinicians' estimates at baseline to examine whether they account for intervention success or failure. We tested an A&F intervention to reduce computed tomography (CT) ordering by emergency physicians, while also examining the physicians' baseline estimates of their own behavior compared to peers.
Our study was a prospective, multi-site, 20-month, randomized trial to examine the effect of an A&F intervention on CT ordering rates, overall and by test subtype. From the electronic health record, we obtained 12 months of baseline CT ordering per 100 patients treated for every physician from four emergency departments. Those who were randomized to receive A&F were shown a de-identified graph of the group's baseline CT utilization, asked to estimate wherein the distribution of their own CT order practices fell, and then shown their actual performance. All participants also received a brief educational intervention. CT ordering rates were collected for all physicians for 6 months after the intervention. Pre-post ordering rates were compared using independent and repeated measures t tests.
Fifty-one of 52 eligible physicians participated. The mean CT ordering rate increased significantly in both experimental conditions after the intervention (intervention pre = 35.7, post = 40.3, t = 4.13, p < 0.001; control pre = 33.9, post = 38.9, t = 3.94, p = 0.001), with no significant between-group difference observed at follow-up (t = 0.43, p = 0.67). Within the intervention group, physicians had poor accuracy in estimating their own ordering behavior at baseline: most overestimated and all guessed that they were in the upper half of the distribution of their peers. CT ordering increased regardless of self-estimate accuracy.
Our A&F intervention failed to reduce physician CT ordering: our feedback to the physicians showed most of them that they had overestimated their CT ordering behavior, and they were therefore unlikely to reduce it as a result. After "audit," it may be prudent to assess baseline clinician awareness of behavior before moving toward a feedback intervention.
审核与反馈(A&F)已被用作一种改变临床医生行为的策略,并取得了一定成效。虽然理论上认为A&F通过提高临床医生对自身行为估计的准确性来发挥作用,但很少有干预措施在基线时纳入对临床医生估计的评估,以检验其是否能解释干预的成功或失败。我们测试了一种A&F干预措施,以减少急诊医生开具计算机断层扫描(CT)的医嘱,同时将医生对自身行为的基线估计与同行进行比较。
我们的研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、为期20个月的随机试验,旨在研究A&F干预对CT医嘱开具率的影响,包括总体及按检查亚型的情况。从电子健康记录中,我们获取了来自四个急诊科的每位医生每治疗100名患者的12个月基线CT医嘱开具情况。随机接受A&F的医生会看到一组去识别化的基线CT使用情况图表,被要求估计自己的CT医嘱开具行为在该分布中的位置,然后展示他们的实际表现。所有参与者还接受了简短的教育干预。干预后6个月收集所有医生的CT医嘱开具率。使用独立样本和重复测量t检验比较前后的医嘱开具率。
52名符合条件的医生中有51名参与。干预后,两个试验组的平均CT医嘱开具率均显著增加(干预组干预前=35.7,干预后=40.3,t=4.13,p<0.001;对照组干预前=33.9,干预后=38.9,t=3.94,p=0.001),随访时未观察到组间显著差异(t=0.43,p=0.67)。在干预组中,医生在基线时对自身医嘱开具行为的估计准确性较差:大多数人高估了,所有人都猜测自己处于同行分布的上半部分。无论自我估计准确性如何,CT医嘱开具都有所增加。
我们的A&F干预未能降低医生开具CT医嘱的情况:我们向医生反馈的结果显示,他们中的大多数人高估了自己的CT医嘱开具行为,因此不太可能因此而减少。在“审核”之后,在进行反馈干预之前,谨慎的做法可能是评估临床医生对行为的基线认知情况。