*Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; †Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Beetham Eye Institute, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; §Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute and the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and ¶Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest University Eye Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Retina. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(10):2080-8. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318295f744.
Explore differences in green compared with yellow focal/grid laser treatment on functional and anatomical endpoints in eyes with diabetic macular edema.
Data from two randomized clinical trials were evaluated for differences in visual acuity and optical coherence tomography parameters for eyes assigned to sham injection + prompt laser, ranibizumab + prompt laser, or prompt laser only: among subgroups of eyes treated exclusively and electively with either green or yellow laser.
In the sham injection + prompt laser group, the mean visual acuity letter score change for eyes receiving green and yellow laser treatment, respectively, was +2.4 ± 14 and +5.1 ± 13 at the 52-week visit (P = 0.06) and +2.4 ± 15 and +6.0 ± 13 at the 104-week visit (P = 0.13), with no corresponding evidence of differences in optical coherence tomography thickness. When comparing wavelength groups in the ranibizumab + prompt laser and prompt laser-only groups, meaningful differences in visual acuity and optical coherence tomography thickness were not detected at 1 year or 2 years.
A trend toward improved vision outcome with yellow laser observed in one trial was not corroborated by anatomical outcomes or by the other trial. In this study, without random assignment to different wavelengths controlling for bias and confounding, it is not possible to determine whether one wavelength is better than the other.
探究在糖尿病黄斑水肿患者中,绿色与黄色焦点/格栅激光治疗在功能和解剖终点方面的差异。
评估了两项随机临床试验的数据,以比较接受假注射+即刻激光、雷珠单抗+即刻激光或仅即刻激光治疗的眼睛在视力和光学相干断层扫描参数方面的差异:在仅接受绿色或黄色激光选择性和专门治疗的亚组中进行比较。
在假注射+即刻激光组中,分别接受绿色和黄色激光治疗的眼睛在 52 周和 104 周时的平均视力字母评分变化分别为+2.4±14 和+5.1±13(P=0.06)和+2.4±15 和+6.0±13(P=0.13),但在光学相干断层扫描厚度方面没有相应的差异证据。在雷珠单抗+即刻激光和仅即刻激光组中比较波长组时,在 1 年或 2 年时均未发现视力和光学相干断层扫描厚度有明显差异。
一项试验中观察到黄色激光在视力结果方面的改善趋势,但在解剖学结果或另一项试验中并未得到证实。在这项研究中,由于没有随机分配到不同波长以控制偏倚和混杂因素,因此无法确定哪种波长优于另一种波长。