Worden Blaise L, McCrady Barbara S
Hartford Hospital/Institute of Living, Center for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Hartford, Connecticut 06106.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2013;31(186):186-205. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2013.771977.
Feedback brief interventions for alcohol use problems have been highly effective with undergraduate populations. However, there has been little research on the effectiveness of administering feedback alone to community treatment populations. The goal of the current study was to assess the effectiveness of a feedback brief intervention in a community treatment setting with patients characterized largely by dependence on alcohol and drugs, ethnic diversity, and low socioeconomic status. It was hypothesized that pre-treatment brief individualized feedback would reduce alcohol consumption and increase participation in subsequent treatment for a substance use disorder (SUD). Participants were recruited from a public hospital's SUD clinic. After the intake but prior to entry into the treatment as usual, 121 participants were randomized to receive personalized feedback or a condition without feedback. Eighty-seven participants completed post-intervention follow-up interviews and were included in the final analyses. Repeated measures ANOVAs and MANCOVAs were used to examine variables obtained from the Addiction Severity Index (ASI; McLellan et al., 1992) of drinking quantity and frequency, and motivation for treatment. Results indicated that personalized feedback delivered no benefit beyond that of pre-treatment assessment procedures (phone screening and intake interview) alone. Intervention conditions did not differ on other outcomes at follow-up, including days of heavy drinking, motivation for treatment, or drug use frequency. Therefore, feedback-based brief interventions may be not helpful in reducing the drinking frequency and intensity of individuals presenting to community-based substance use treatment.
针对酒精使用问题的反馈简短干预措施在本科人群中非常有效。然而,对于仅向社区治疗人群提供反馈的有效性研究却很少。本研究的目的是评估在社区治疗环境中,针对主要以酒精和药物依赖、种族多样性以及社会经济地位较低为特征的患者进行反馈简短干预的有效性。研究假设是,治疗前的简短个性化反馈将减少酒精消费,并增加对物质使用障碍(SUD)后续治疗的参与度。参与者从一家公立医院的物质使用障碍诊所招募。在进行初次评估后但在进入常规治疗之前,121名参与者被随机分配接受个性化反馈或无反馈的条件。87名参与者完成了干预后的随访访谈,并被纳入最终分析。使用重复测量方差分析和协方差分析来检查从成瘾严重程度指数(ASI;McLellan等人,1992年)获得的饮酒量、饮酒频率以及治疗动机等变量。结果表明,个性化反馈除了单独的治疗前评估程序(电话筛查和初次评估访谈)之外没有带来任何益处。在随访的其他结果方面,包括重度饮酒天数、治疗动机或药物使用频率,干预条件没有差异。因此,基于反馈的简短干预可能无助于降低前来接受社区物质使用治疗的个体的饮酒频率和强度。