Suppr超能文献

晚期早产儿、早期足月产和足月产婴儿早期干预计划的入组情况。

Enrollment in early intervention programs among infants born late preterm, early term, and term.

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2013 Jul;132(1):e61-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3121.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of and characteristics associated with early intervention (EI) program enrollment among infants born late preterm (34–36 weeks’ gestation), early term (37–38 weeks’ gestation), and term (39–41 weeks’ gestation).

METHODS

A Massachusetts cohort of 554 974 singleton infants born during 1998 through 2005 and survived the neonatal period was followed until the third birthday of each infant. Data came from the Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal Data System that linked birth certificates, birth hospital discharge reports, death certificates, and EI program enrollment records. We calculated prevalence and adjusted risk ratios to compare differences and understand associations.

RESULTS

The prevalence of EI program enrollment increased with each decreasing week of gestation before 41 weeks (late preterm [23.5%],early term [14.9%], and term [11.9%]. In adjusted analyses, the strongest predictors of EI enrollment (adjusted risk ratio ≥1.20) for all gestational age groups were male gender, having a congenital anomaly, and having mothers who were ≥40 years old, non high school graduates, and recipients of public insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants born late preterm and early term have higher prevalence of EI program services enrollment than infants born at term,and may benefit from more frequent monitoring for developmental delays or disabilities.

摘要

目的

比较孕晚期早产儿(34-36 周)、早期足月产儿(37-38 周)和足月产儿(39-41 周)早期干预(EI)项目入组的流行率及其特征。

方法

一项对 1998 年至 2005 年间在马萨诸塞州出生且在新生儿期存活的 554974 名单胎婴儿的队列研究,随访至每个婴儿 3 岁生日。数据来自妊娠到早期生命纵向数据系统,该系统将出生证明、分娩医院出院报告、死亡证明和 EI 项目登记记录联系起来。我们计算了流行率,并调整了风险比来比较差异和理解关联。

结果

在 41 周之前,每周的胎龄越小,EI 项目入组的比例越高(孕晚期早产儿为 23.5%,早期足月产儿为 14.9%,足月产儿为 11.9%)。在调整分析中,所有胎龄组中,EI 入组的最强预测因素(调整风险比≥1.20)为男性、先天性异常和母亲年龄≥40 岁、未高中毕业、接受公共保险。

结论

与足月产儿相比,孕晚期早产儿和早期足月产儿的 EI 项目服务入组率更高,可能需要更频繁地监测发育迟缓或残疾。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ba/4407274/ffced6b78c73/nihms676594f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Public Health Implications of Very Preterm Birth.极早产的公共卫生影响
Clin Perinatol. 2018 Sep;45(3):565-577. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2018.05.007.
9
Early Therapy Services Following Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge.新生儿重症监护病房出院后的早期治疗服务
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017 Nov;37(4):414-424. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2016.1247937. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

3
School-age outcomes of late preterm infants in New York City.纽约市晚期早产儿的学龄期结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;206(3):222.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.007.
6
Postnatal glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term infants.晚期早产儿和足月新生儿的产后血糖稳态。
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):575-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3851. Epub 2011 Feb 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验