• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展中亚洲城市从垃圾填埋气中回收能源的气候协同效益:以曼谷为例。

Climate co-benefits of energy recovery from landfill gas in developing Asian cities: a case study in Bangkok.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2013 Oct;31(10):1002-11. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13492004.

DOI:10.1177/0734242X13492004
PMID:23797299
Abstract

Landfilling is the most common and cost-effective waste disposal method, and it is widely applied throughout the world. In developing countries in Asia there is currently a trend towards constructing sanitary landfills with gas recovery systems, not only as a solution to the waste problem and the associated local environmental pollution, but also to generate revenues through carbon markets and from the sale of electricity. This article presents a quantitative assessment of climate co-benefits from landfill gas (LFG) to energy projects, based on the case of Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Thailand. Life cycle assessment was used for estimating net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, considering the whole lifespan of the landfill. The assessment found that the total GHG mitigation of the Bangkok project would be 471,763 tonnes (t) of carbon dioxide (CO(2))-equivalents (eq) over its 10-year LFG recovery period.This amount is equivalent to only 12% of the methane (CH(4)) generated over the whole lifespan of the landfill. An alternative scenario was devised to analyse possible improvement options for GHG mitigation through LFG-to-energy recovery projects. This scenario assumes that LFG recovery would commence in the second year of landfill operation and gas extraction continues throughout the 20-year peak production period. In this scenario, GHG mitigation potential amounted to 1,639,450 tCO(2)-eq during the 20-year project period, which is equivalent to 43% of the CH(4) generated throughout the life cycle. The results indicate that with careful planning, there is a high potential for improving the efficiency of existing LFG recovery projects which would enhance climate co-benefits, as well as economic benefits. However, the study also shows that even improved gas recovery systems have fairly low recovery rates and, in consequence, that emissions of GHG from such landfills sites are still considerable.

摘要

填埋是最常见和最具成本效益的废物处理方法,在世界范围内得到广泛应用。在亚洲的发展中国家,目前有一种趋势是建造带有气体回收系统的卫生填埋场,这不仅是解决废物问题和相关的当地环境污染的一种方法,也是通过碳市场和出售电力来产生收入的一种方法。本文以泰国曼谷都市区管理局为例,对垃圾填埋气(LFG)到能源项目的气候协同效益进行了定量评估。生命周期评估用于估算净温室气体(GHG)排放,考虑了垃圾填埋场的整个生命周期。评估发现,曼谷项目的总 GHG 减排量将在其 10 年的 LFG 回收期内达到 471763 吨二氧化碳(CO2)当量(eq)。这一数量仅相当于整个填埋场生命周期中产生的甲烷(CH4)的 12%。设计了一个替代方案来分析通过 LFG 到能源回收项目实现 GHG 减排的可能改进方案。该方案假设 LFG 回收将在垃圾填埋场运营的第二年开始,并且气体提取将在 20 年的高峰期持续进行。在这种情况下,20 年项目期间的 GHG 减排潜力达到 1639450 吨二氧化碳(CO2)当量,相当于整个生命周期中产生的 CH4 的 43%。结果表明,通过精心规划,提高现有 LFG 回收项目效率的潜力很大,这将提高气候协同效益和经济效益。然而,该研究还表明,即使是改进的气体回收系统也只有相当低的回收率,因此,这些垃圾填埋场的温室气体排放仍然相当可观。

相似文献

1
Climate co-benefits of energy recovery from landfill gas in developing Asian cities: a case study in Bangkok.发展中亚洲城市从垃圾填埋气中回收能源的气候协同效益:以曼谷为例。
Waste Manag Res. 2013 Oct;31(10):1002-11. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13492004.
2
Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures.中国城市固体废物卫生填埋过程中的温室气体排放:废物特性和 LFG 处理措施的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:510-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.039. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
3
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
4
Landfilling of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.垃圾填埋:温室气体核算和全球变暖贡献。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):825-36. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09348529. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
5
Comparison between landfill gas and waste incineration for power generation in Astana, Kazakhstan.哈萨克斯坦阿斯塔纳垃圾填埋气与垃圾焚烧发电的比较。
Waste Manag Res. 2015 May;33(5):486-94. doi: 10.1177/0734242X15576562. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
6
Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration: Expected outcomes based on US landfill gas collection regulations.垃圾填埋与焚烧的生命周期温室气体排放:基于美国垃圾填埋场沼气收集法规的预期结果。
Waste Manag. 2022 Apr 1;142:44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.01.040. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Harnessing landfill gas (LFG) for electricity: A strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Jakarta (Indonesia).利用垃圾填埋气(LFG)发电:缓解雅加达(印度尼西亚)温室气体(GHG)排放的策略。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113882. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113882. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
8
Methane emission quantification from municipal waste landfills: models and computer software-a case study of Long An Province, Vietnam.从城市垃圾填埋场量化甲烷排放:模型和计算机软件-以越南隆安省为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(28):41886-41908. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15270-x. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
9
Evaluating greenhouse gas impacts of organic waste management options using life cycle assessment.运用生命周期评估方法评价有机废物管理方案的温室气体影响。
Waste Manag Res. 2012 Aug;30(8):800-12. doi: 10.1177/0734242X12440479. Epub 2012 May 15.
10
Greenhouse gas emissions estimation from proposed El Fukhary Landfill in the Gaza Strip.加沙地带拟议的法卡里垃圾填埋场的温室气体排放估算
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Jun;66(6):597-608. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1154115.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing energy from the waste produced in Bangladesh: evaluating potential technologies.利用孟加拉国产生的废弃物中的能量:评估潜在技术。
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 19;7(10):e08221. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08221. eCollection 2021 Oct.