• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从澳大利亚全科医生的角度看慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者转诊至肺康复的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究

Barriers to, and facilitators for, referral to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients from the perspective of Australian general practitioners: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Johnston Kylie N, Young Mary, Grimmer Karen A, Antic Ral, Frith Peter A

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Sep;22(3):319-24. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00062.

DOI:10.4104/pcrj.2013.00062
PMID:23797679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6442818/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in the management of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but referral to this service is low.

AIMS

To identify barriers to, and facilitators for, referral to PR programmes from the perspective of Australian general practitioners.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with general practitioners involved in the care of people with COPD. Interview questions were informed by a validated behavioural framework and asked about participants' experience of referring people with COPD for PR, and barriers to, or facilitators of, this behaviour. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve general practitioners participated in this study, 10 of whom had never referred a patient to a PR programme. Four major categories relating to barriers to referral were identified: low knowledge of PR for COPD; low knowledge of how to refer; actual or anticipated access difficulties for patients; and questioning the need to do more to promote exercise behaviour change. Awareness of benefit was the only current facilitator. Three major categories of potential facilitators were identified: making PR part of standard COPD care through financial incentive; improving information flow with regard to referrals and services; and informing patients and public.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant barriers to referral exist, but opportunities to change the organisation of practice and information management were identified. Behaviour change strategies which directly target these barriers and incorporate facilitators should make up the key components of interventions to improve referral to PR by general practitioners who care for people with COPD.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的管理推荐采用肺康复(PR),但该服务的转诊率较低。

目的

从澳大利亚全科医生的角度确定COPD患者转诊至PR项目的障碍及促进因素。

方法

对参与COPD患者护理的全科医生进行半结构式访谈。访谈问题依据经过验证的行为框架提出,询问参与者将COPD患者转诊至PR的经验以及这种行为的障碍或促进因素。访谈进行录音,逐字转录,并采用内容分析法进行分析。

结果

12名全科医生参与了本研究,其中10人从未将患者转诊至PR项目。确定了与转诊障碍相关的四大类因素:对COPD的PR了解不足;对转诊方式了解不足;患者实际或预期的就诊困难;质疑是否需要采取更多措施促进运动行为改变。认识到益处是目前唯一的促进因素。确定了三大类潜在促进因素:通过经济激励使PR成为COPD标准护理的一部分;改善转诊和服务方面的信息流通;向患者及公众宣传。

结论

转诊存在重大障碍,但已确定改变执业组织和信息管理的机会。直接针对这些障碍并纳入促进因素的行为改变策略应成为干预措施的关键组成部分,以改善照顾COPD患者的全科医生对PR的转诊情况。

相似文献

1
Barriers to, and facilitators for, referral to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients from the perspective of Australian general practitioners: a qualitative study.从澳大利亚全科医生的角度看慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者转诊至肺康复的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Sep;22(3):319-24. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00062.
2
Referral of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers for primary healthcare practitioners.将慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者转介至肺康复治疗:对初级保健医生的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Mar 26;70(693):e274-e284. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708101. Print 2020 Apr.
3
Why are some evidence-based care recommendations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease better implemented than others? Perspectives of medical practitioners.为什么有些基于证据的慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理建议实施得更好?医务人员的观点。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:659-67. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S26581. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
4
Investigating primary healthcare practitioners' barriers and enablers to referral of patients with COPD to pulmonary rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.调查初级保健从业者在将 COPD 患者转介至肺康复治疗方面的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):e046875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046875.
5
Interventions to increase referral and uptake to pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD: a systematic review.提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复转诊率和接受率的干预措施:一项系统综述
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Oct 29;13:3571-3586. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S172239. eCollection 2018.
6
Which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care recommendations have low implementation and why? A pilot study.哪些慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理建议的实施率较低,原因何在?一项试点研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Nov 23;5:652. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-652.
7
Understanding the factors affecting self-management of COPD from the perspectives of healthcare practitioners: a qualitative study.从医护人员的角度理解 COPD 自我管理的影响因素:一项定性研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Sep 18;27(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0054-6.
8
Participants' experiences of the benefits, barriers and facilitators of attending a community-based exercise programme for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.参与者对参加社区为慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者设立的锻炼计划的获益、障碍和促进因素的体验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):969-978. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12929. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
A qualitative assessment of the pulmonary rehabilitation decision-making needs of patients living with COPD.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者参与肺康复决策的需求:定性研究
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022 Jun 29;32(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00285-9.
10
General practitioners' perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.全科医生对慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗的看法:定性访谈的主题分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Aug 17;11:1929-37. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S108611. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Smartphone App-Guided Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Randomized Controlled Trial.智能手机应用程序引导的慢性呼吸道疾病肺康复:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 25;13:e64884. doi: 10.2196/64884.
2
Lung Flare Care: Development of a web resource to improve recovery after COPD exacerbations: A mixed methods study.肺部 flare 护理:开发一个网络资源以改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重后的恢复:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2025 May 22;20(5):e0324468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324468. eCollection 2025.
3
Interventions to improve referrals from primary care to outpatient specialist services for chronic conditions: a systematic review and framework synthesis update.改善慢性病从初级保健向门诊专科服务转诊的干预措施:系统评价与框架综合更新
Syst Rev. 2025 May 9;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02841-z.
4
Changes in Mental and Physical Health Outcomes Following One Day a Week Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation in Regional New South Wales.新南威尔士州地区每周一天心肺康复后身心健康结果的变化
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Apr;33(2):e70033. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70033.
5
A service evaluation following the implementation of computer guided consultation software to support primary care reviews for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.在实施计算机辅助咨询软件以支持慢性阻塞性肺疾病初级保健评估之后进行的服务评估。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2025 Mar 11;35(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41533-025-00421-1.
6
Barriers and Enablers for Accessing Rehabilitation Services: Findings From the Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 1-Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives.获得康复服务的障碍与促进因素:康复选择研究的结果,第1部分——医疗保健专业人员的观点
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14120. doi: 10.1111/hex.14120.
7
Epidemiology of bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症的流行病学。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Oct 9;33(174). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0091-2024. Print 2024 Oct.
8
Smartphone application-based rehabilitation in patients with chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.基于智能手机应用的慢性呼吸和心血管疾病患者康复。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 6;14(1):3018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53583-2.
9
Feasibility of a home-designed respiratory rehabilitation program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.一种用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的家庭设计呼吸康复方案的可行性。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Jan 30;25:e7. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000324.
10
Physicians' Knowledge of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国医生对肺康复的认知:一项横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jan 16;19:121-131. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S429517. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Respiratory symptoms and illness in older Australians: the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study.老年澳大利亚人呼吸症状和疾病:阻塞性肺病负担(BOLD)研究。
Med J Aust. 2013 Feb 18;198(3):144-8. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11640.
2
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.1990年和2010年20个年龄组中235种死因的全球和区域死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2010的系统分析
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
3
Which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care recommendations have low implementation and why? A pilot study.哪些慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理建议的实施率较低,原因何在?一项试点研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Nov 23;5:652. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-652.
4
Effectiveness, attendance, and completion of an integrated, system-wide pulmonary rehabilitation service for COPD: prospective observational study.COPD 综合系统肺康复服务的有效性、出勤率和完成情况:前瞻性观察研究。
COPD. 2012 Aug;9(5):546-54. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2012.707258.
5
A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians' beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.一项关于重症监护医师对其输血行为的信念的跨国比较:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2012 Sep 21;7:93. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-93.
6
A pilot study of an Internet walking program and pedometer in COPD.一项关于 COPD 患者使用互联网步行程序和计步器的初步研究。
Respir Med. 2012 Sep;106(9):1342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
7
Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework.制定基于理论的行为改变干预措施以将证据付诸实践:使用理论领域框架的系统方法。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-38.
8
Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.理论领域框架在行为改变和实施研究中的验证。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
9
Why are some evidence-based care recommendations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease better implemented than others? Perspectives of medical practitioners.为什么有些基于证据的慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理建议实施得更好?医务人员的观点。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:659-67. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S26581. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
10
The management of Type 2 diabetes: a survey of Australian general practitioners.2 型糖尿病管理:澳大利亚全科医生调查。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Mar;95(3):326-32. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 5.