Thakre Subhash B, Thakre Sushama S, Alone Swapnil
Preventive and Social Medicine, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):764-71.
Qualitative research methods provide a means of collecting and interpreting narrative or observational data about such interactions, leading to a deeper understanding of the process of health care delivery. This approach was used to clarify key themes from parents' comments about challenges on paths to detect hearing impairment.
An exploratory descriptive qualitative research design is used. In-depth interviews by using a semi-structured questionnaire and focus group discussions (FGD) were held with parents, and other study groups. A study was conducted in Deaf Dum Rural School, Saoner, Nagpur district, Maharashtra, India. Purposive voluntary sampling is utilized. Semi-structured and in-depth interviews and FGD were conducted in private rooms. A FGD guide covered open-ended comments to the set of questions.
Parents of 65 children (59%) replied to the questionnaire. Out of them, 55 (85.6%) were the parents of school children resides in the hostel. The majority of the children have profound hearing impairment (75.86%). Theme analysis revealed perceptions about causes, ways, and means of early detection, and powerful emotions experienced by parents at FGD.
Reaching beyond numerical analyses, qualitative studies allow for expression of junior doctors, Deaf and Dump School teacher and parents' thoughts, feelings, and experiences. This study provides a means of collecting and interpreting narrative or observational data.
定性研究方法提供了一种收集和解释关于此类互动的叙述性或观察性数据的方法,从而能更深入地理解医疗服务提供过程。本研究采用这种方法,以阐明家长对听力障碍检测过程中所面临挑战的评论中的关键主题。
采用探索性描述性定性研究设计。通过半结构化问卷对家长及其他研究群体进行了深入访谈,并组织了焦点小组讨论(FGD)。研究在印度马哈拉施特拉邦那格浦尔区绍纳的聋哑农村学校进行。采用目的抽样法。在私人房间内进行了半结构化和深入访谈以及焦点小组讨论。焦点小组讨论指南涵盖了对一系列问题的开放式评论。
65名儿童(59%)的家长回复了问卷。其中,55名(85.6%)是住校学童的家长。大多数儿童患有重度听力障碍(75.86%)。主题分析揭示了在焦点小组讨论中家长对听力障碍成因、早期检测方式及方法的看法,以及他们所经历的强烈情感。
定性研究超越了数值分析,能够表达初级医生、聋哑学校教师和家长的想法、感受及经历。本研究提供了一种收集和解释叙述性或观察性数据的方法。