• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative analysis of parents' experience of hearing loss of their school going children of a rural area of Nagpur.那格浦尔农村地区学龄儿童家长对孩子听力损失经历的定性分析。
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):764-71.
2
Qualitative analysis of parents' experience with early detection of hearing loss.父母对听力损失早期检测体验的定性分析
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Apr;89(4):353-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.024125.
3
Hearing Parents' Appraisals of Parenting a Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Child: Application of a Positive Psychology Framework.倾听父母对养育失聪或重听儿童的评价:积极心理学框架的应用
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Jul;21(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enw007. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
4
Qualitative analysis of parents' experience with receiving the news of the detection of their child's hearing loss.对父母获悉其子女听力损失检测结果的经历进行定性分析。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Mar;74(3):265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.11.017. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
5
School-aged Children with Mild Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss: Parents' Reflections on Services, Experiences, and Outcomes.患有轻度双侧和单侧听力损失的学龄儿童:家长对服务、经历和结果的反思。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018 Apr 1;23(2):140-147. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enx049.
6
Surviving, not thriving: a qualitative analysis of parents' perceptions of physical activity participation for rurally residing children with a disability.勉强生存,而非蓬勃发展:对农村残疾儿童家长对体育活动参与看法的定性分析
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Aug;18(3):4536. doi: 10.22605/RRH4536. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
7
What influences parents' decisions to limit or withdraw life support?是什么影响了父母做出限制或撤销生命维持治疗的决定?
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;6(5):513-8. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000170616.28175.d9.
8
Plurality of perspective: Doctor-parents of deaf children in a low-to middle-income country.多元化视角:中低收入国家聋儿的医生父母。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar;142:110610. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110610. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
9
Parental involvement in the care and intervention of children with hearing loss.家长参与听力损失儿童的护理和干预。
Int J Audiol. 2018 May;57(sup2):S15-S26. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1220679. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
10
Challenges faced by parents when seeking diagnosis for children with sensorineural hearing loss.家长在为患有感音神经性听力损失的儿童寻求诊断时所面临的挑战。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Apr;143:110656. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110656. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Instruments for evaluating the parental emotional status and ecological support systems among parents who considered cochlear implantation for their children with hearing loss: A scoping review.评估考虑为听力损失儿童植入人工耳蜗的父母的情绪状态和生态支持系统的工具:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 29;19(7):e0305748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305748. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The challenge of hearing impairments in children.儿童听力障碍的挑战。
Can Fam Physician. 1977 Feb;23:63-71.
2
Identifying deafness in early childhood: requirements after the newborn hearing screen.早期儿童耳聋的识别:新生儿听力筛查后的要求。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jan;96(1):62-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.185819. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
3
Generating an evidence base for information, education and communication needs of the community regarding deafness: a qualitative study.为社区关于耳聋的信息、教育和沟通需求建立证据基础:一项定性研究。
Indian J Community Med. 2010 Jul;35(3):420-3. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.69275.
4
Six year effectiveness of a population based two tier infant hearing screening programme.一项基于人群的两级婴幼儿听力筛查计划的六年成效
Arch Dis Child. 2002 Apr;86(4):245-50. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.4.245.
5
Qualitative research in systematic reviews. Has established a place for itself.系统评价中的定性研究。已确立了自身的地位。
BMJ. 2001 Oct 6;323(7316):765-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.765.
6
Validity in qualitative research.定性研究中的效度
Qual Health Res. 2001 Jul;11(4):522-37. doi: 10.1177/104973201129119299.
7
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.定性研究:标准、挑战与指南。
Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.
8
WHO tackles hearing disabilities in developing world.世界卫生组织应对发展中国家的听力残疾问题。
Lancet. 2001 Jul 21;358(9277):219. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05460-5.
9
Deafness and its prevention--Indian scenario.耳聋及其预防——印度情况
Indian J Pediatr. 1997 Nov-Dec;64(6):801-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02725502.
10
Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research.医疗保健中的定性研究。评估定性研究的质量。
BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.

那格浦尔农村地区学龄儿童家长对孩子听力损失经历的定性分析。

Qualitative analysis of parents' experience of hearing loss of their school going children of a rural area of Nagpur.

作者信息

Thakre Subhash B, Thakre Sushama S, Alone Swapnil

机构信息

Preventive and Social Medicine, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):764-71.

PMID:23798944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3687884/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Qualitative research methods provide a means of collecting and interpreting narrative or observational data about such interactions, leading to a deeper understanding of the process of health care delivery. This approach was used to clarify key themes from parents' comments about challenges on paths to detect hearing impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An exploratory descriptive qualitative research design is used. In-depth interviews by using a semi-structured questionnaire and focus group discussions (FGD) were held with parents, and other study groups. A study was conducted in Deaf Dum Rural School, Saoner, Nagpur district, Maharashtra, India. Purposive voluntary sampling is utilized. Semi-structured and in-depth interviews and FGD were conducted in private rooms. A FGD guide covered open-ended comments to the set of questions.

RESULTS

Parents of 65 children (59%) replied to the questionnaire. Out of them, 55 (85.6%) were the parents of school children resides in the hostel. The majority of the children have profound hearing impairment (75.86%). Theme analysis revealed perceptions about causes, ways, and means of early detection, and powerful emotions experienced by parents at FGD.

CONCLUSIONS

Reaching beyond numerical analyses, qualitative studies allow for expression of junior doctors, Deaf and Dump School teacher and parents' thoughts, feelings, and experiences. This study provides a means of collecting and interpreting narrative or observational data.

摘要

引言

定性研究方法提供了一种收集和解释关于此类互动的叙述性或观察性数据的方法,从而能更深入地理解医疗服务提供过程。本研究采用这种方法,以阐明家长对听力障碍检测过程中所面临挑战的评论中的关键主题。

材料与方法

采用探索性描述性定性研究设计。通过半结构化问卷对家长及其他研究群体进行了深入访谈,并组织了焦点小组讨论(FGD)。研究在印度马哈拉施特拉邦那格浦尔区绍纳的聋哑农村学校进行。采用目的抽样法。在私人房间内进行了半结构化和深入访谈以及焦点小组讨论。焦点小组讨论指南涵盖了对一系列问题的开放式评论。

结果

65名儿童(59%)的家长回复了问卷。其中,55名(85.6%)是住校学童的家长。大多数儿童患有重度听力障碍(75.86%)。主题分析揭示了在焦点小组讨论中家长对听力障碍成因、早期检测方式及方法的看法,以及他们所经历的强烈情感。

结论

定性研究超越了数值分析,能够表达初级医生、聋哑学校教师和家长的想法、感受及经历。本研究提供了一种收集和解释叙述性或观察性数据的方法。