Al-Obaidi Saud, Al-Sayegh Nowall, Nadar Mohammed
Dept of Physical Therapy, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Jul;11(5):1025-31. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2011-0357. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
Grip strength assessment reflects on overall health of the musculoskeletal system and is a predictor of functional prognosis and mortality. The purpose of this study was: examine whether grip-strength and fatigue resistance are impaired in smokers, determine if smoking-related impairments (fatigue-index) can be predicted by demographic data, duration of smoking, packets smoked-per-day, and physical activity.
Maximum isometric grip strength (MIGS) of male smokers (n = 111) and nonsmokers (n = 66) was measured before/after induced fatigue using Jamar dynamometer at 5-handle positions. Fatigue index was calculated based on percentage change in MIGS initially and after induced fatigue.
Number of repetitions to squeeze the soft rubber ball to induce fatigue was significantly lower in smokers compared with nonsmokers (t = 10.6, P < .001 dominant hand; t = 13.9, P < .001 nondominant), demonstrating a significantly higher fatigue-index for smokers than nonsmokers (t = -8.7, P < .001 dominant hand; t = -6.0, P < .001 nondominant). The effect of smoking status on MIGS scores was significantly different between smokers and nonsmokers after induced fatigue (β = -3.98, standard error = 0.59, P < .001) where smokers experienced on average a reduction of nearly 4 MIGS less than nonsmokers before fatigue. Smoking status was the strongest significant independent predictor of the fatigue-index.
Smokers demonstrated reduced grip strength and fast fatigability in comparison with nonsmokers.
握力评估反映了肌肉骨骼系统的整体健康状况,是功能预后和死亡率的预测指标。本研究的目的是:检查吸烟者的握力和抗疲劳能力是否受损,确定吸烟相关的损伤(疲劳指数)是否可以通过人口统计学数据、吸烟持续时间、每日吸烟包数和身体活动来预测。
使用Jamar测力计在5个手柄位置测量男性吸烟者(n = 111)和非吸烟者(n = 66)在诱发疲劳前后的最大等长握力(MIGS)。根据初始和诱发疲劳后MIGS的百分比变化计算疲劳指数。
与非吸烟者相比,吸烟者挤压软橡胶球诱发疲劳的重复次数显著更低(优势手:t = 10.6,P < .001;非优势手:t = 13.9,P < .001),表明吸烟者的疲劳指数显著高于非吸烟者(优势手:t = -8.7,P < .001;非优势手:t = -6.0,P < .001)。诱发疲劳后,吸烟者和非吸烟者的吸烟状态对MIGS评分的影响存在显著差异(β = -3.98,标准误差 = 0.59,P < .001),吸烟者在疲劳前平均比非吸烟者少近4个MIGS。吸烟状态是疲劳指数最强的显著独立预测因素。
与非吸烟者相比,吸烟者的握力降低且易疲劳。