Suppr超能文献

用于界定缺血核心区的表观扩散系数阈值

Apparent diffusion coefficient threshold for delineation of ischemic core.

作者信息

Purushotham Archana, Campbell Bruce C V, Straka Matus, Mlynash Michael, Olivot Jean-Marc, Bammer Roland, Kemp Stephanie M, Albers Gregory W, Lansberg Maarten G

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, the Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, National Center for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3):348-53. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12068. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

MRI-based selection of patients for acute stroke interventions requires rapid accurate estimation of the infarct core on diffusion-weighted MRI. Typically used manual methods to delineate restricted diffusion lesions are subjective and time consuming. These limitations would be overcome by a fully automated method that can rapidly and objectively delineate the ischemic core. An automated method would require predefined criteria to identify the ischemic core.

AIM

The aim of this study is to determine apparent diffusion coefficient-based criteria that can be implemented in a fully automated software solution for identification of the ischemic core.

METHODS

Imaging data from patients enrolled in the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) study who had early revascularization following intravenous thrombolysis were included. The patients' baseline restricted diffusion and 30-day T2 -weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery lesions were manually delineated after coregistration. Parts of the restricted diffusion lesion that corresponded with 30-day infarct were considered ischemic core, whereas parts that corresponded with normal brain parenchyma at 30 days were considered noncore. The optimal apparent diffusion coefficient threshold to discriminate core from noncore voxels was determined by voxel-based receiver operating characteristics analysis using the Youden index.

RESULTS

51,045 diffusion positive voxels from 14 patients who met eligibility criteria were analyzed. The mean DWI lesion volume was 24 (± 23) ml. Of this, 18 (± 22) ml was ischemic core and 3 (± 5) ml was noncore. The remainder corresponded to preexisting gliosis, cerebrospinal fluid, or was lost to postinfarct atrophy. The apparent diffusion coefficient of core was lower than that of noncore voxels (P < 0.0001). The optimal threshold for identification of ischemic core was an apparent diffusion coefficient ≤ 620 × 10(-6) mm(2) /s (sensitivity 69% and specificity 78%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the ischemic core can be identified with an absolute apparent diffusion coefficient threshold. This threshold can be implemented in image analysis software for fully automated segmentation of the ischemic core.

摘要

背景

基于磁共振成像(MRI)为急性中风干预选择患者,需要在扩散加权MRI上快速准确地估计梗死核心。通常用于描绘扩散受限病变的手动方法主观且耗时。一种能够快速、客观地描绘缺血核心的全自动方法将克服这些局限性。全自动方法需要预定义标准来识别缺血核心。

目的

本研究的目的是确定基于表观扩散系数的标准,该标准可在用于识别缺血核心的全自动软件解决方案中实施。

方法

纳入参与“理解中风演变的扩散与灌注成像评估(DEFUSE)”研究且在静脉溶栓后早期进行血管再通的患者的成像数据。在配准后手动描绘患者的基线扩散受限区域和30天的T2加权液体衰减反转恢复病变。与30天梗死相对应的扩散受限病变部分被视为缺血核心,而与30天时正常脑实质相对应的部分被视为非核心。使用约登指数通过基于体素的受试者工作特征分析确定区分核心与非核心体素的最佳表观扩散系数阈值。

结果

对符合纳入标准的14例患者的51,045个扩散阳性体素进行了分析。平均扩散加权成像(DWI)病变体积为24(±23)ml。其中,18(±22)ml为缺血核心,3(±5)ml为非核心。其余部分对应于既往存在的胶质增生、脑脊液,或因梗死后萎缩而缺失。核心的表观扩散系数低于非核心体素(P<0.0001)。识别缺血核心的最佳阈值是表观扩散系数≤620×10⁻⁶mm²/s(敏感性69%,特异性78%)。

结论

我们的数据表明,缺血核心可通过绝对表观扩散系数阈值来识别。该阈值可在图像分析软件中实施,用于缺血核心的全自动分割。

相似文献

1
Apparent diffusion coefficient threshold for delineation of ischemic core.
Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3):348-53. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12068. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
5
Cerebral Blood Flow Predicts the Infarct Core: New Insights From Contemporaneous Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging.
Stroke. 2019 Oct;50(10):2783-2789. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026640. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch in ischemic stroke.
Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2648-53. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.660548. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
9
Perfusion computer tomography: imaging and clinical validation in acute ischaemic stroke.
Brain. 2011 Nov;134(Pt 11):3408-16. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr257.
10
Comparison of perfusion computed tomography with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in hyperacute ischemic stroke.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Nov-Dec;28(6):747-55. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200411000-00004.

引用本文的文献

3
ADC Threshold Indicating the Ischemic Region for Predicting Efficacy in Thrombectomy.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2025;136:129-134. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-89844-0_16.
4
Reversibility of diffuse magnetic resonance imaging following endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):5703-5718. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2885. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
6
Diffusion Imaging Protocol Heterogeneity Biases Ischemic Core Volume, Location, and Clinical Associations in Acute Stroke.
Stroke. 2025 Apr;56(4):915-925. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047317. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
7
Outcome prediction comparison of ischaemic areas' radiomics in acute anterior circulation non-lacunar infarction.
Brain Commun. 2024 Nov 15;6(6):fcae393. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae393. eCollection 2024.
8
Recruitment of pial collaterals and carotid occlusive disease in large-vessel occlusion ischemic stroke.
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 28;15:1423967. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1423967. eCollection 2024.
9
Amide proton transfer MRI may reflect effective reperfusion and predict functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2025 Mar;45(3):421-430. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241297110. Epub 2024 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical applications of diffusion MR imaging for acute ischemic stroke.
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2011 Feb;21(1):51-69, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2011.02.002.
3
Real-time diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Nov;32(5):1024-37. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22338.
5
Pretreatment diffusion- and perfusion-MR lesion volumes have a crucial influence on clinical response to stroke thrombolysis.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 Jun;30(6):1214-25. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.3. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
6
Ischemic lesion volume determination on diffusion weighted images vs. apparent diffusion coefficient maps.
Brain Res. 2009 Jul 7;1279:182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 May 8.
7
Does diffusion-weighted imaging represent the ischemic core? An evidence-based systematic review.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):1206-12. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1547. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
8
The MRA-DWI mismatch identifies patients with stroke who are likely to benefit from reperfusion.
Stroke. 2008 Sep;39(9):2491-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508572. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
9
Risk factors of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after tPA therapy for acute stroke.
Stroke. 2007 Aug;38(8):2275-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.480475. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
10
Evaluation of the clinical-diffusion and perfusion-diffusion mismatch models in DEFUSE.
Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1826-30. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.480145. Epub 2007 May 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验