do Nascimento Viviany Teixeira, de Lucena Reinaldo Farias Paiva, Maciel Maria Inês Sucupira, de Albuquerque Ulysses Paulino
Laboratory of Botany, State University of Bahia, Barreiras, Bahia , Brazil.
Ecol Food Nutr. 2013;52(4):317-43. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2012.707434.
The investigation aimed to compare the knowledge about food plants in rural communities of the Caatinga. The study was conducted in two rural communities in northeastern Brazil. Data collection utilized different ethnobotanical methods, including free listing, semi-structured interviews, and recall. Native species are less frequently consumed as food in both locations. Fruits are the most frequently cited wild resource, but in practice, most of this food availability potential is wasted. Despite community knowledge about wild species with potential food, few species are actually utilized, and thus, many plants are not included in the diets of the populations studied.
该调查旨在比较卡廷加农村社区对食用植物的了解。研究在巴西东北部的两个农村社区进行。数据收集采用了不同的民族植物学方法,包括自由列举、半结构化访谈和回忆法。在这两个地方,本地物种作为食物被食用的频率较低。水果是最常被提及的野生资源,但实际上,这种食物供应潜力大多被浪费了。尽管社区了解具有潜在食用价值的野生物种,但实际被利用的物种很少,因此,许多植物并未被纳入所研究人群的饮食中。