Office of Dietary Supplements, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-7517, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Aug;98(2):460-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.061234. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
No consensus exists about which cutoff point should be applied for serum vitamin B-12 (SB-12) concentrations to define vitamin B-12 status in population-based research.
The study's aim was to identify whether a change point exists at which the relation between plasma methylmalonic acid (MMA) and SB-12 changes slope to differentiate between inadequate and adequate vitamin B-12 status by using various statistical models.
We used data on adults (≥19 y; n = 12,683) from NHANES 1999-2004-a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey. We evaluated 6 piece-wise polynomial and exponential decay models that used different control levels for known covariates.
The MMA-defined change point for SB-12 varied depending on the statistical model used. A linear-splines model was determined to best fit the data, as determined by the approximate permutation test; 3 slopes relating SB-12 and MMA and resulting in 2 change points and 3 subgroups were shown. The first group (SB-12 <126 pmol/L) was small and had the highest MMA concentration (median: 281 nmol/L; 95% CI: 245, 366 nmol/L; n = 157, 1.2%); many in this group could be considered at high risk of severe deficiency because combined abnormalities of MMA and homocysteine were very frequent and the concentrations themselves were significantly higher. The highest SB-12 group (SB-12 >287 pmol/L; n = 8569, 67.6%) likely had adequate vitamin B-12 status (median MMA: 120 nmol/L; 95% CI: 119, 125 nmol/L). The vitamin B-12 status of the sizable intermediate group (n = 3957, 33%) was difficult to interpret.
The 3 distinct slopes for the relation between SB-12 and MMA challenges the conventional use of one cutoff point for classifying vitamin B-12 status. In epidemiologic research, the use of one cutoff point would fail to separate the small, severely deficient group from the intermediate group that has neither normal nor clearly deficient vitamin B-12 concentrations (ie, unknown vitamin B-12 status). This intermediate group requires further characterization.
目前,在基于人群的研究中,血清维生素 B-12(SB-12)浓度的截断值尚未达成共识,无法确定何种浓度可以用于定义维生素 B-12 状态。
本研究旨在通过使用不同的统计模型,确定是否存在一个转折点,在此转折点处,血浆甲基丙二酸(MMA)与 SB-12 的关系斜率发生变化,从而区分维生素 B-12 状态是否不足或充足。
我们使用了来自 NHANES 1999-2004 年(一项具有全国代表性的横断面调查)的≥19 岁成年人的数据(n=12683)。我们评估了 6 种分段多项式和指数衰减模型,这些模型针对已知协变量使用了不同的控制水平。
MMA 定义的 SB-12 转折点因所使用的统计模型而异。通过近似置换检验,线性样条模型被确定为最适合数据的模型;结果显示 3 种 SB-12 和 MMA 相关关系和由此产生的 2 个转折点和 3 个亚组。第一亚组(SB-12<126 pmol/L)很小,MMA 浓度最高(中位数:281 nmol/L;95%CI:245,366 nmol/L;n=157,1.2%);由于 MMA 和同型半胱氨酸联合异常非常常见,且浓度本身显著升高,该亚组中的许多人可能处于严重缺乏维生素 B-12 的高风险中。SB-12 浓度最高的亚组(SB-12>287 pmol/L;n=8569,67.6%)可能具有充足的维生素 B-12 状态(中位数 MMA:120 nmol/L;95%CI:119,125 nmol/L)。较大的中间亚组(n=3957,33%)的维生素 B-12 状态难以解释。
SB-12 和 MMA 之间关系的 3 个不同斜率对传统的使用一个截断值来分类维生素 B-12 状态提出了挑战。在流行病学研究中,如果使用一个截断值,就无法将小而严重缺乏的组与中间组区分开来,而中间组的维生素 B-12 浓度既不是正常的,也不是明显缺乏的(即,维生素 B-12 状态未知)。这个中间组需要进一步的特征描述。