Grant Roy, Ramgoolam Andres, Betz Ryan, Ruttner Laura, Green John J
Children's Health Fund, New York, NY, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2010 Oct 1;1(3):152-7. doi: 10.1177/2150131910380727.
Increases in hospital emergency department use have been driven by insured patients with problems accessing primary care services. Access problems are especially pronounced in rural communities with health professional shortages. This qualitative study explored reasons for nonurgent pediatric emergency department use in the Mississippi Delta.
Using a community-based participatory research framework, a semistructured survey was administered face-to-face in a hospital emergency department waiting room with parents/caregivers who brought their children. Interviews were done over 144 hours in 2-hour blocks covering regular "business hours" and "after hours" (evenings/weekends). Open-ended items allowed qualitative data to be gathered describing reasons for emergency department use and perceptions of urgency of the visit in the parents'/caregivers' own words.
There were 112 children, with a response rate of 87%. The mean child age was 5.7 years; 52% were male; 95% were African American and 5% white; 80.6% had Medicaid/SCHIP, 7.8% commercial, and 3.9% other insurance; 7.8% were uninsured. Most (88%) had a usual source of pediatric care. Only 24.3% tried to obtain care before emergency department visit; 23.2% said their children required "urgent" care. Mean distance from home to usual source of care was 10 miles. Ten percent cited transportation as a barrier to keeping health care appointments; 5.5% cited insurance or cost. Families who used the emergency department during evening/weekends were significantly more likely to have cited clinic hours of operation as a reason care was not sought previously than were "business hours" users, who emphasized convenience.
Nonurgent pediatric emergency department use could be reduced by extending clinic hours, adding a walk-in service, and making transportation more available.
获得初级保健服务存在问题的参保患者推动了医院急诊科就诊人数的增加。在卫生专业人员短缺的农村社区,就诊问题尤为突出。这项定性研究探讨了密西西比三角洲地区非紧急儿科急诊科就诊的原因。
采用基于社区的参与性研究框架,在医院急诊科候诊室对带孩子前来的父母/照顾者进行面对面的半结构化调查。访谈在144小时内分2小时时段进行,涵盖正常“营业时间”和“非营业时间”(晚上/周末)。开放式问题允许收集定性数据,用父母/照顾者自己的话描述急诊科就诊的原因以及对就诊紧迫性的看法。
共有112名儿童参与,回复率为87%。儿童平均年龄为5.7岁;52%为男性;95%为非裔美国人,5%为白人;80.6%有医疗补助/儿童健康保险计划,7.8%有商业保险,3.9%有其他保险;7.8%未参保。大多数(88%)有固定的儿科护理来源。只有24.3%的人在前往急诊科就诊前试图寻求护理;23.2%的人表示他们的孩子需要“紧急”护理。从家到常规护理来源的平均距离为10英里。10%的人提到交通是妨碍按时就诊的障碍;5.5%的人提到保险或费用。与强调便利性的“营业时间”就诊者相比,在晚上/周末使用急诊科的家庭更有可能将诊所营业时间作为之前未寻求护理的原因。
通过延长诊所营业时间、增加即时就诊服务以及提供更多交通方式,可以减少非紧急儿科急诊科就诊情况。