• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)及实现糖尿病控制的频率。

Frequency of Monitoring Hemoglobin A1C and Achieving Diabetes Control.

作者信息

Parcero Augusto F, Yaeger Thomas, Bienkowski Robert S

机构信息

Robert Packer Hospital and Guthrie Clinic, Sayre, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Jul 1;2(3):205-8. doi: 10.1177/2150131911403932. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1177/2150131911403932
PMID:23804802
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The American Diabetes Association recommends measuring hemoglobin A1C levels (A1C) at least semiannually in diabetic patients who have stable glycemic control and quarterly in patients whose therapy has changed or who are not meeting glycemic goals. These guidelines were based on expert consensus without reference to actual clinical data. The main objective of this study was to assess association between meeting a target A1C level of <7% and adherence to monitoring guidelines. Secondary objectives were to determine the proportion of diabetic patients in the authors' practice who met the A1C monitoring guidelines and to assess whether meeting the target A1C level is associated with other information easily abstracted from patients records, namely age, gender, and types of therapy.

METHODS

This study employed a case control design. Records of 193 type 2 diabetic patients seen over a 6-month period in a rural family medicine clinic were analyzed. Assessment of diabetes control was based on the most recent A1C level, with <7% considered controlled. Adherence to guidelines was assessed by determining frequency of testing during the preceding 12-month period.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients (51%) adhered to the American Diabetes Association guidelines on frequency of monitoring A1C. Median levels of adherent and nonadherent patients differed significantly (6.5 vs 7.3, P < .001, Mann-Whitney test). Logistic regression analysis showed that "diabetes control" based on the A1C level is positively associated with adherence to the guidelines, negatively associated with intensity of therapy, and not associated with gender or age.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the usefulness of American Diabetes Association practice guidelines on the frequency of monitoring A1C levels in diabetic patients.

摘要

目的

美国糖尿病协会建议,血糖控制稳定的糖尿病患者至少每半年测量一次糖化血红蛋白水平(A1C),而治疗方案改变或未达血糖目标的患者则应每季度测量一次。这些指南是基于专家共识制定的,未参考实际临床数据。本研究的主要目的是评估达到A1C目标水平<7%与遵循监测指南之间的关联。次要目的是确定作者所在医疗机构中符合A1C监测指南的糖尿病患者比例,并评估达到A1C目标水平是否与可从患者记录中轻松提取的其他信息相关,即年龄、性别和治疗类型。

方法

本研究采用病例对照设计。分析了一家农村家庭医学诊所6个月内诊治的193例2型糖尿病患者的记录。根据最新的A1C水平评估糖尿病控制情况,A1C<7%视为控制良好。通过确定前12个月内的检测频率来评估对指南的遵循情况。

结果

98例患者(51%)遵循了美国糖尿病协会关于A1C监测频率的指南。遵循指南和未遵循指南的患者的中位数水平差异显著(6.5对7.3,P<.001,曼-惠特尼检验)。逻辑回归分析表明,基于A1C水平的“糖尿病控制”与遵循指南呈正相关,与治疗强度呈负相关,与性别或年龄无关。

结论

本研究支持美国糖尿病协会关于糖尿病患者A1C水平监测频率的实践指南的实用性。

相似文献

1
Frequency of Monitoring Hemoglobin A1C and Achieving Diabetes Control.监测糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)及实现糖尿病控制的频率。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Jul 1;2(3):205-8. doi: 10.1177/2150131911403932. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
2
Diabetes management in the real world and the impact of adherence to guideline recommendations.现实世界中的糖尿病管理以及遵循指南建议的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Nov;30(11):2233-40. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.952716. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
3
What is the proper use of hemoglobin A1c monitoring in the elderly?血红蛋白A1c监测在老年人中的正确应用是什么?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Mar;7(3 Suppl):S60-4, 59. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.12.017.
4
Provider organization performance assessment utilizing diabetes physician recognition program.利用糖尿病医生认可计划对医疗服务提供机构进行绩效评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Feb;15(2):132-6.
5
Using Reminder Letters to Improve Adherence to Routine Hemoglobin A1C Testing in Adults with Diabetes.使用提醒信提高成年糖尿病患者常规血红蛋白 A1C 检测的依从性。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2022 Dec;81(12):323-327.
6
Comparison of the adherence to the american diabetes association guidelines of diabetes care in primary care and subspecialty clinics.基层医疗诊所和专科诊所对美国糖尿病协会糖尿病护理指南的遵循情况比较。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015 Apr 24;14:35. doi: 10.1186/s40200-015-0158-x. eCollection 2015.
7
Internal Medicine Resident Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices in Management of Diabetes Mellitus.内科住院医师在糖尿病管理中对循证实践的依从性
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Feb 2;9:23821205221076659. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076659. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Effect of Covid-19 quarantine on diabetes Care in Children.新冠疫情隔离对儿童糖尿病护理的影响。
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 May 21;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40842-021-00122-x.
9
Glycosylated haemoglobin (A1c) best values for type 2 diabetes in the battlefield much ado about nothing? (apparently).糖化血红蛋白(A1c)对于战场上的2型糖尿病而言是最佳指标?这是不是小题大做了?(显然是)
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019 Jun 20;11:48. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0442-x. eCollection 2019.
10
Behavioral economics survey of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.1型和2型糖尿病患者的行为经济学调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 May 11;9:649-58. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S82022. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Variability in Test Interval Is Linked to Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Trajectory over Time.测试间隔的变化与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)随时间的变化轨迹有关。
J Diabetes Res. 2022 May 16;2022:7093707. doi: 10.1155/2022/7093707. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of an Electronic Trigger to Identify Delayed Follow-up HbA1c Testing for Patients with Uncontrolled Diabetes.开发一种电子触发器,用于识别未控制糖尿病患者延迟的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测随访情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):928-934. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07224-3. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
3
Disparities in Hemoglobin A Testing During the Transition to Adulthood and Association With Diabetes Outcomes in Youth-Onset Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.
青少年期1型和2型糖尿病患者向成年期过渡期间血红蛋白A检测的差异及其与糖尿病结局的关联:青少年糖尿病研究(SEARCH)
Diabetes Care. 2021 Aug 10;44(10):2320-8. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2983.
4
What methods are being used to create an evidence base on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care? A scoping review.正在使用哪些方法来建立关于在初级保健中使用实验室检测来监测长期疾病的证据基础?一项范围综述。
Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 28;37(6):845-853. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa074.
5
Completion of therapeutic and safety monitoring tests in Lebanese outpatients on chronic medications: a cross-sectional study.黎巴嫩慢性药物门诊患者治疗及安全性监测测试的完成情况:一项横断面研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Sep 8;8:1195-204. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S69250. eCollection 2014.
6
Glycemic control among individuals with self-reported diabetes in India--the ICMR-INDIAB Study.印度自我报告患有糖尿病个体的血糖控制——印度医学研究理事会-印度糖尿病研究(ICMR-INDIAB研究)
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Sep;16(9):596-603. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0018. Epub 2014 Aug 7.