• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用提醒信提高成年糖尿病患者常规血红蛋白 A1C 检测的依从性。

Using Reminder Letters to Improve Adherence to Routine Hemoglobin A1C Testing in Adults with Diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI (ACY, SP, AH, UAO).

Department of Clinical Investigation, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI (ML).

出版信息

Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2022 Dec;81(12):323-327.

PMID:36504501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9727705/
Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends hemoglobin A1C (A1C) goals of < 7% for most non-pregnant adults and < 8% for adult patients with extensive or life-limiting comorbidities. A1C testing is indicated every 3-months for patients not meeting goals to assess glycemic control, adjust medications, suggest lifestyle changes, and offer counseling. However, many patients do not adhere to routine testing. A clinic-wide quality improvement (QI) pilot project was implemented using mailed reminder letters to improve patient adherence to routine A1C testing in patients with hemoglobin A1C . 8%. Sixty-eight patients were identified for this letter intervention. Of these, 14 patients (20%) were historically adherent to 3-month interval testing, 31 patients (46%) were historically non-adherent, and 23 (34%) had historical A1C test intervals of less than 3-months because of provider orders. The primary outcome was improvement in A1C testing adherence rates of those who were previously non-adherent. There was a 58% increase overall and a 103% increase in testing rates among women. Statistical significance was not observed at the P = .05 level. However, improvement in adherence rates among women reached the P = .10 significance level. Mailed reminder letters may be useful in improving adherence to routine A1C testing in patients with diabetes. Further study of this intervention in larger groups is needed to provide timely data for the management of diabetes care.

摘要

美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 建议大多数非妊娠成年人的血红蛋白 A1C (A1C) 目标<7%,而有广泛或生命有限合并症的成年患者的目标<8%。对于未达到目标的患者,每 3 个月进行一次 A1C 检测,以评估血糖控制情况、调整药物、建议生活方式改变并提供咨询。然而,许多患者并未遵循常规检测。实施了一项全诊所质量改进 (QI) 试点项目,使用邮寄提醒信来提高患者对 A1C 常规检测的依从性,A1C 水平为 8%。有 68 名患者符合此信函干预条件。其中,14 名患者(20%)既往 3 个月间隔检测依从性良好,31 名患者(46%)既往不依从,23 名患者(34%)因医嘱而 A1C 检测间隔小于 3 个月。主要结局是提高既往不依从患者的 A1C 检测依从率。总体依从率提高了 58%,女性检测率提高了 103%。在 P=0.05 水平未观察到统计学意义。然而,女性的依从率提高达到了 P=0.10 的显著性水平。邮寄提醒信可能有助于提高糖尿病患者对常规 A1C 检测的依从性。需要在更大的人群中进一步研究这种干预措施,以便为糖尿病护理管理提供及时的数据。

相似文献

1
Using Reminder Letters to Improve Adherence to Routine Hemoglobin A1C Testing in Adults with Diabetes.使用提醒信提高成年糖尿病患者常规血红蛋白 A1C 检测的依从性。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2022 Dec;81(12):323-327.
2
Use of automated reminder letters to improve diabetes management in primary care: outcomes of a quality improvement initiative.使用自动提醒信函改善基层医疗中的糖尿病管理:一项质量改进举措的结果
Qual Prim Care. 2013;21(6):359-68.
3
Diabetes management in the real world and the impact of adherence to guideline recommendations.现实世界中的糖尿病管理以及遵循指南建议的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Nov;30(11):2233-40. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.952716. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
4
Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in an internal medicine resident clinic--a randomized trial.在内科住院医师诊所使用登记生成的审核、反馈和患者提醒干预——一项随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22(12):1740-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0431-x. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
5
Frequency of Monitoring Hemoglobin A1C and Achieving Diabetes Control.监测糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)及实现糖尿病控制的频率。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Jul 1;2(3):205-8. doi: 10.1177/2150131911403932. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
6
Implementing point-of-care hemoglobin A1C testing in an obstetrics outpatient clinic.在妇产科门诊实施即时血红蛋白 A1C 检测。
Lab Med. 2024 Jul 3;55(4):464-470. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmad112.
7
Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on diabetes-related outcomes in a military treatment facility.临床药师干预对军队医疗机构糖尿病相关结局的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Mar;46(3):353-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q564. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
8
Hemoglobin A1c testing in an emergency department.急诊科的糖化血红蛋白检测
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;5(6):1437-43. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500615.
9
Evaluation of the Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Telehealth Clinic on Diabetes-Related Goals of Therapy in a Veteran Population.药师主导的远程医疗诊所对退伍军人人群糖尿病相关治疗目标影响的评估。
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Mar;36(3):348-56. doi: 10.1002/phar.1719. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
10
Hemoglobin A1C testing frequency among patients with type 2 diabetes within a US payer system: a retrospective observational study.在美国支付体系中,2 型糖尿病患者的血红蛋白 A1C 检测频率:一项回顾性观察研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Nov;37(11):1859-1866. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1965562. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
5. Facilitating Behavior Change and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: .5. 促进行为改变和幸福感以改善健康结果:。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S48-S65. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S005.
2
Disparities in Diabetes Prevalence Among Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders and Asians in Hawai'i.夏威夷原住民/其他太平洋岛民和亚洲人在糖尿病患病率方面的差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Feb 21;16:E22. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180187.
3
Attend: A Two-Pronged Trial to Eliminate No Shows in Diagnostic Imaging at a Community-Based Hospital.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019 Mar;50(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
4
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S61-S70. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S006.
5
Health Care Disparities Between Men and Women With Type 2 Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者中男女之间的医疗保健差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Apr 19;15:E46. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170120.
6
Impact of HbA1c Testing at Point of Care on Diabetes Management.即时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测对糖尿病管理的影响。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):611-617. doi: 10.1177/1932296816678263. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
7
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
The impact of interventions on appointment and clinical outcomes for individuals with diabetes: a systematic review.干预措施对糖尿病患者预约及临床结局的影响:一项系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 2;15:355. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0938-5.
9
Literacy disparities in patient access and health-related use of Internet and mobile technologies.患者在获取互联网和移动技术以及与健康相关的使用方面的文化程度差异。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3079-87. doi: 10.1111/hex.12294. Epub 2014 Nov 2.
10
Mechanisms of diabetic complications.糖尿病并发症的发病机制。
Physiol Rev. 2013 Jan;93(1):137-88. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2011.