• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为癌症患者偶然诊断出的肺栓塞的门诊管理制定一项复杂干预措施。

Developing a complex intervention for the outpatient management of incidentally diagnosed pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.

作者信息

Palmer June, Bozas George, Stephens Andrew, Johnson Miriam, Avery Ged, O'Toole Lorcan, Maraveyas Anthony

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 27;13:235. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-235.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-235
PMID:23806053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3718646/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) spend 5-7 days in hospital even though only 4.5% will develop serious complications during this time. In particular, the group of patients with incidentally diagnosed PE (i-PE) includes many patients with low risk features potentially ideal for outpatient management; however the evidence for their optimal management is lacking hence relative practices may vary considerably. We describe the development process, components, links and function of a nurse-led service for the management of patients with i-PE, developed in accordance to the UK Medical Research Council complex intervention guidance.

METHODS

Phase 0 (Theoretical underpinning): The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) was selected for patient risk assessment and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline for the management of PE in cancer patients (2007) was selected as quality measure. Historical registry and audit data from our centre regarding i-PE incidence and management for the period between 2006 and 2009 illustrating the then current practices were reviewed. Phase 1 (Modelling): Modelling of the pathway included the following: a) Identification of training needs, planning and implementation of training schemes and development of transferable competencies and training materials. b) Mapping patient pathways and flow and c) Production of key documentation and Standard Operating Procedures for the delivery of the service.

RESULTS

Phase 2 (Implementation and testing of the intervention): During the initial 12 months of implementation, remedial action was taken to address identified deficiencies regarding patient referral to the pathway, compliance with treatment protocol, patient follow up, selection challenges from the use of PESI in cancer patients and challenges regarding the "first-pass" identification of i-PE.

CONCLUSION

We have developed and piloted a complex intervention to manage cancer patients with incidental PE in an outpatient setting. Adherence to evidence- based care, improvement of communication between professionals and patients, and improved quality of data is demonstrated.

摘要

背景

大多数肺栓塞(PE)患者住院5 - 7天,尽管在此期间只有4.5%的患者会出现严重并发症。特别是,偶然诊断为PE(i-PE)的患者群体包括许多具有低风险特征的患者,这些患者可能非常适合门诊管理;然而,缺乏关于其最佳管理的证据,因此相关实践可能差异很大。我们描述了一项由护士主导的服务的开发过程、组成部分、联系和功能,该服务用于管理i-PE患者,是根据英国医学研究理事会的复杂干预指南开发的。

方法

第0阶段(理论基础):选择肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)进行患者风险评估,并选择美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)关于癌症患者PE管理的指南(2007年)作为质量衡量标准。回顾了我们中心2006年至2009年期间关于i-PE发病率和管理的历史登记和审计数据,以说明当时的现行做法。第1阶段(建模):该路径的建模包括以下内容:a)确定培训需求、规划和实施培训计划以及开发可转移的能力和培训材料。b)绘制患者路径和流程,以及c)编制关键文件和服务提供的标准操作程序。

结果

第2阶段(干预的实施和测试):在实施的最初12个月内,采取了补救措施,以解决在患者转诊至该路径、遵守治疗方案、患者随访、在癌症患者中使用PESI的选择挑战以及i-PE的“首次”识别方面发现的缺陷。

结论

我们已经开发并试点了一项复杂干预措施,用于在门诊环境中管理偶然发生PE的癌症患者。证明了坚持循证护理、改善专业人员与患者之间的沟通以及提高数据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/3718646/915711befb41/1472-6963-13-235-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/3718646/84b933cbebb5/1472-6963-13-235-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/3718646/915711befb41/1472-6963-13-235-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/3718646/84b933cbebb5/1472-6963-13-235-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/3718646/915711befb41/1472-6963-13-235-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a complex intervention for the outpatient management of incidentally diagnosed pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.为癌症患者偶然诊断出的肺栓塞的门诊管理制定一项复杂干预措施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 27;13:235. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-235.
2
Identification of Low-Risk Patients with Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism for Outpatient Therapy.识别急性有症状性肺栓塞的低危患者以进行门诊治疗。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Aug;12(8):1122-9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201504-202OC.
3
Identification of patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism suitable for outpatient treatment using the pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI).利用肺栓塞严重指数(PESI)识别适合门诊治疗的低危肺栓塞患者。
Ir J Med Sci. 2013 Jun;182(2):291-5. doi: 10.1007/s11845-012-0878-6. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
4
Increasing Safe Outpatient Management of Emergency Department Patients With Pulmonary Embolism: A Controlled Pragmatic Trial.增加急诊肺栓塞患者安全门诊管理:一项对照实用试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 18;169(12):855-865. doi: 10.7326/M18-1206. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Outpatient treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.门诊治疗有症状的肺栓塞:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thromb Res. 2013 Nov;132(5):515-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
6
[Pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: foundations of the EPIPHANY study].[癌症患者的肺栓塞:EPIPHANY研究基础]
Med Clin (Barc). 2015 Jan;144 Suppl 1:31-7. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7753(15)30016-6.
7
Best Clinical Practice: Controversies in Outpatient Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.最佳临床实践:急性肺栓塞门诊管理中的争议
J Emerg Med. 2017 May;52(5):668-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
8
Prospective validation of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. A clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism.肺栓塞严重程度指数的前瞻性验证。一种肺栓塞的临床预后模型。
Thromb Haemost. 2008 Nov;100(5):943-8. doi: 10.1160/th08-05-0285.
9
Prognostic Value of Treatment Setting in Patients With Cancer Having Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison With the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index.癌症合并肺栓塞患者治疗环境的预后价值:与肺栓塞严重程度指数的比较
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017 Sep;23(6):615-621. doi: 10.1177/1076029615625826. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
Outpatient management of pulmonary embolism.肺栓塞的门诊管理。
Thromb Res. 2017 Jul;155:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the HULL Score clinical prediction rule for unsuspected pulmonary embolism in ambulatory cancer patients.用于门诊癌症患者隐匿性肺栓塞的HULL评分临床预测规则的验证。
ERJ Open Res. 2023 May 2;9(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00651-2022. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Cancer patients' experiences of the diagnosis and treatment of incidental pulmonary embolism (a qualitative study).癌症患者对偶然发生的肺栓塞的诊断和治疗的体验(一项定性研究)。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 25;17(10):e0276754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276754. eCollection 2022.
3
Patient Experience of Living With Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Canada (PELICANADA).

本文引用的文献

1
Incidental venous thromboembolism in oncology patients.肿瘤患者的偶发性静脉血栓栓塞
J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Dec;10(12):2602-4. doi: 10.1111/jth.12023.
2
A clinical prognostic model for the identification of low-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism and active cancer.急性有症状性肺栓塞合并活动性癌症的低危患者的临床预后模型。
Chest. 2013 Jan;143(1):138-145. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0964.
3
Derivation and validation of a multivariate model to predict mortality from pulmonary embolism with cancer: The POMPE-C tool.
加拿大癌症相关血栓患者的生活体验(PELICANADA)。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019 Oct 21;4(1):154-160. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12274. eCollection 2020 Jan.
4
Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism.癌症合并偶发性肺栓塞患者的预后评估。
Thromb J. 2018 Feb 6;16:8. doi: 10.1186/s12959-017-0157-x. eCollection 2018.
5
Patient healthcare trajectory. An essential monitoring tool: a systematic review.患者医疗轨迹。一种重要的监测工具:系统综述。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2017 Apr 12;5(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s13755-017-0020-2. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
Optimisation of complex health interventions prior to a randomised controlled trial: a scoping review of strategies used.随机对照试验前复杂健康干预措施的优化:对所采用策略的范围综述
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Mar 15;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0058-y. eCollection 2016.
癌症相关肺栓塞患者死亡率的多变量预测模型的建立和验证:POMPE-C 工具。
Thromb Res. 2012 May;129(5):e194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
4
Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.门诊与住院治疗急性肺栓塞患者的效果比较:一项国际、开放标签、随机、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2011 Jul 2;378(9785):41-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60824-6. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
5
The inter-rater reliability of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index.肺栓塞严重指数的组内信度。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Dec;104(6):1258-62. doi: 10.1160/TH10-07-0426. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
6
Safety of outpatient treatment in acute pulmonary embolism.门诊治疗急性肺栓塞的安全性。
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Nov;8(11):2412-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04041.x.
7
Prevalence and clinical history of incidental, asymptomatic pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.偶然无症状性肺栓塞的流行率和临床病史:一项荟萃分析。
Thromb Res. 2010 Jun;125(6):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 May 7.
8
Cancer, clots and consensus: new understanding of an old problem.癌症、血栓与共识:对一个老问题的新认识。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 10;27(29):4821-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3032. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
9
Does clinical method mask significant VTE-related mortality and morbidity in malignant disease?临床方法是否掩盖了恶性疾病中与静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)相关的显著死亡率和发病率?
Br J Cancer. 2009 Jun 16;100(12):1837-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605091. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
10
Outpatient treatment and early discharge of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.有症状肺栓塞的门诊治疗与早期出院:一项系统评价
Eur Respir J. 2009 May;33(5):1148-55. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00133608.