• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的对比研究

Comparative study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

作者信息

Gundavda Manit K, Bhandarwar Ajay H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Sir J.J. Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharastra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Sci. 2012 May-Jun;66(5-6):99-115.

PMID:23806983
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Comparative Study of Laparoscopic (LA) versus Open Appendicectomy (OA) as a Cross sectional hospital based study for evaluation of: Postoperative quality of life Postoperative painAmount of Narcotics/Analgesics usedHospital stayTime to full recovery

BACKGROUND

This underdeveloped residuum of the caecum has no known function and is commonly termed as a 'vestigial' organ, yet diseases of the appendix loom large in surgical practice; and appendicitis continues to be the most common acute abdominal condition that requires immediate surgical treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Study to be carried out over a period of two months included patient diagnosed with appendicitis and admitted to surgery ward at Sir J.J. Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, India and St. George Hospital, Mumbai, India and willing to be enrolled in the study.Demographic data, clinical features, investigations, Technique, reintroduction of diet, postoperative pain, use of analgesia, hospital stay were documented and outcome recorded in a predesigned case record form. Return to normal activity and work was determined by questioning during postoperative clinic.

RESULTS

Proved that laparoscopic procedures cause less post-operative pain than their conventional counterpartsAnalgesic requirement for post operative analgesia was significantly less in LA (mean 4 inj. doses) compared to the OA (mean 5.9 inj. doses) Hospital stay was less for LA (2.23 days) than OA (3.4 days) Full recovery on the basis of return to normal activity was earlier in LA (6.53 days) as compared to OA (8.7 days).

CONCLUSION

LA holds a promising prospect and may replace OA in the near future as the method of choice for effective and qualitative clinical management of appendicitis in emergency and in elective set up.

摘要

未标注

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的对比研究——一项基于医院横断面的研究,用于评估:术后生活质量、术后疼痛、麻醉剂/镇痛药使用量、住院时间、完全康复时间

背景

盲肠的这一未发育残留物没有已知功能,通常被称为“退化”器官,但阑尾疾病在外科实践中却很突出;阑尾炎仍然是最常见的需要立即手术治疗的急性腹部疾病。

研究设计

为期两个月的研究纳入了在印度孟买J.J.医院集团和印度孟买圣乔治医院被诊断为阑尾炎并入住外科病房且愿意参与研究 的患者。记录人口统计学数据、临床特征、检查、手术技术、饮食恢复情况、术后疼痛、镇痛药物使用情况、住院时间,并将结果记录在预先设计的病例记录表中。通过术后门诊询问确定恢复正常活动和工作的情况。

结果

证明腹腔镜手术比传统手术引起的术后疼痛更少。与开腹阑尾切除术(平均5.9次注射剂量)相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术术后镇痛的镇痛药物需求量显著更少(平均4次注射剂量)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术的住院时间(2.23天)比开腹阑尾切除术(3.4天)更短。基于恢复正常活动,腹腔镜阑尾切除术(6.53天)比开腹阑尾切除术(8.7天)恢复得更早。

结论

腹腔镜阑尾切除术前景广阔,在不久的将来可能会取代开腹阑尾切除术,成为急诊和择期阑尾炎有效和高质量临床管理的首选方法。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的对比研究
Indian J Med Sci. 2012 May-Jun;66(5-6):99-115.
2
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性对比研究
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(55):244-248.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):266-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0563-7. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
4
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
5
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的临床疗效
JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):574-80. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404524.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy; which method to choose? A prospective randomized comparison.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术;该选择哪种方法?一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(6):352-6.
7
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in West Bengal, India.印度西孟加拉邦的腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术对比
Chin J Dig Dis. 2005;6(4):165-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2005.00225.x.
9
Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children.儿童腹腔镜与开放阑尾切除术的单盲随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2001 Apr;88(4):510-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01723.x.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对比
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012 Sep;10(22):239-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of outcomes of open and laparoscopic appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study.开放手术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;6(8):e1483. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1483. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
3
Minilaparoscopic appendectomy using a new spiral needle.经皮微腹腔镜阑尾切除术应用新型螺旋针。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jul;28(7):2086-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3436-7. Epub 2014 Feb 11.