• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of outcomes of open and laparoscopic appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study.开放手术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;6(8):e1483. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1483. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的临床比较:历史队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
3
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术。结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
4
Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a population-based study.经腹式与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗妊娠期急性阑尾炎的比较:基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6025-6031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10075-0. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
6
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
7
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study on the management of acute appendicitis (simple and complicated) in children under 13 years of age.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗 13 岁以下儿童单纯性和复杂性急性阑尾炎的回顾性队列研究。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2021 Oct-Dec;18(4):182-186. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_102_20.
8
Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred approach for appendicitis: a retrospective review of two practice patterns.腹腔镜阑尾切除术是阑尾炎的首选治疗方法:两种实践模式的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0678-x.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):266-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0563-7. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
10
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Study From a Local Secondary Referral Hospital.腹腔镜阑尾切除术的结果:来自当地二级转诊医院的一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 16;16(11):e73791. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73791. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome.腹腔镜手术治疗老年结直肠癌患者的优势,不影响肿瘤学结果。
BMC Surg. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00967-6.
2
Causes of morbidity and mortality among patients admitted in a tertiary hospital in southern Nigeria: A 6 year evaluation.尼日利亚南部一家三级医院住院患者的发病率和死亡率原因:6 年评估。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 25;15(8):e0237313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237313. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparison of postoperative complications between open and laparoscopic appendectomy: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.比较开腹和腹腔镜阑尾切除术术后并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞式综述。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):813-820. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002878.
4
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
5
Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, single center experience.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术临床结局的比较:单中心经验
Heliyon. 2018 May 24;4(5):e00635. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00635. eCollection 2018 May.
6
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性对比研究
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(55):244-248.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature.系统评价和荟萃分析:腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的成人患者:文献更新。
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3083-3099. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4123-3.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人及儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Jun;5(4):542-553. doi: 10.1177/2050640616661931. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项评估结局和成本效益的回顾性队列研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5. eCollection 2016.
10
A comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in Canada.加拿大腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的疗效比较。
Can J Surg. 2015 Dec;58(6):431-2. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012715.

开放手术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of outcomes of open and laparoscopic appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Basukala Sunil, Thapa Niranjan, Bhusal Ujwal, Shrestha Oshan, Karki Sagun, Regmi Shiva K, Shah Kunda B, Shah Aasish

机构信息

Department of Surgery Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences Kathmandu Nepal.

College of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences Kathmandu Nepal.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;6(8):e1483. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1483. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.1483
PMID:37547357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10400783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open appendectomy has been the conventional choice of treatment for acute appendicitis. However, nowadays laparoscopic approach is emerging for the benefits it provides, like lesser postoperative pain and lesser duration of hospital stay, but at the cost of higher expenses and longer operative duration.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was done at Shree Birendra Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021, with a total study population of 450 participants (300 in open appendectomy and 150 in laparoscopic appendectomy). Preoperative. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were compared and analyzed between two groups using SPSS-25.

RESULTS

The mean age was 26.72 ± 9.70 in the open appendectomy (OA) and years 23.89 ± 6.32 in the laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group. ( = 0.010) There was a significant difference between the mean operative time (46.08 ± 13.10 min in OA and 56.86 ±  11.70 min in LA,  = 0.000), length of hospital stay (1.28 ± 0.80 days in OA and 1.07 ±  0.25 days in LA,  = 0.000), course of oral analgesics (3.55 ± 0.68 days in OA and 3.00 days in LA  = 0.000) between OA groups and LA groups, while the total number of complications was less in the LA group however there was no statistically significant difference postoperative complications ( = 0.124) between the two groups in the surgical findings.

CONCLUSION

All in all, the laparoscopic approach is a better option for uncomplicated appendicitis due to its less postoperative pain and shorter duration of hospital stay.

摘要

背景

开放性阑尾切除术一直是急性阑尾炎的传统治疗选择。然而,如今腹腔镜手术方法因其带来的益处而兴起,比如术后疼痛较轻、住院时间较短,但代价是费用较高且手术时间较长。

方法

2018年1月至2021年12月在什里·比伦德拉医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究,总研究人群为450名参与者(300例行开放性阑尾切除术,150例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术)。使用SPSS - 25对两组患者的术前、术中和术后参数进行比较和分析。

结果

开放性阑尾切除术(OA)组的平均年龄为26.72±9.70岁,腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)组为23.89±6.32岁(P = 0.010)。平均手术时间存在显著差异(OA组为46.08±13.10分钟,LA组为56.86±11.70分钟,P = 0.000),住院时间(OA组为1.28±0.80天,LA组为1.07±0.25天,P = 0.000),口服镇痛药疗程(OA组为3.55±0.68天,LA组为3.00天,P = 0.000),而LA组的并发症总数较少,不过两组手术结果的术后并发症无统计学显著差异(P = 0.124)。

结论

总体而言,腹腔镜手术方法是单纯性阑尾炎的更好选择,因为其术后疼痛较轻且住院时间较短。