Office of High Performance Computing and Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Aug;19(8):579-84. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0219. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
Uncompressed high-definition (HD) video image quality is superior to compressed HD video provided in most commercially available videoconferencing products. Uncompressed HD videoconferencing tools provide a more immersive experience because there is no reduction of image information and, in most cases, lower latency. Four open source uncompressed video applications are reviewed that have been tested at the National Library of Medicine: three transmitting uncompressed HD video and one transmitting loosely compressed standard-definition video. The technical requirements for implementing each are described, and test results in terms of image quality, latency, and application reliability are presented. Because the hardware and bandwidth requirements for uncompressed HD video are relatively high and most applications are still under development, they are generally not ready for mass deployment. Some are, however, ready for pilot testing and experimentation in clinical settings by either those who have or anticipate having bandwidth sufficient to support them or those interested in researching the effects higher-quality video may have on diagnostic and other clinical outcomes.
未压缩的高清(HD)视频质量优于大多数市售视频会议产品中提供的压缩 HD 视频。未压缩的高清视频会议工具提供更身临其境的体验,因为没有图像信息的减少,并且在大多数情况下,延迟更低。审查了在国立医学图书馆测试的四个开源未压缩视频应用程序:三个传输未压缩的高清视频,一个传输松散压缩的标准定义视频。描述了实施每个应用程序的技术要求,并根据图像质量、延迟和应用程序可靠性呈现测试结果。由于未压缩的 HD 视频的硬件和带宽要求相对较高,并且大多数应用程序仍在开发中,因此它们通常不适合大规模部署。但是,对于那些有或预计有足够带宽支持它们的人,或者对于那些有兴趣研究更高质量视频对诊断和其他临床结果可能产生的影响的人来说,有些应用程序已经准备好进行临床环境中的试点测试和实验。