• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断和预后预测模型。

Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center (UMC), Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jun;11 Suppl 1:129-41. doi: 10.1111/jth.12262.

DOI:10.1111/jth.12262
PMID:23809117
Abstract

Risk prediction models can be used to estimate the probability of either having (diagnostic model) or developing a particular disease or outcome (prognostic model). In clinical practice, these models are used to inform patients and guide therapeutic management. Examples from the field of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) include the Wells rule for patients suspected of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and more recently prediction rules to estimate the risk of recurrence after a first episode of unprovoked VTE. In this paper, the three phases that are recommended before a prediction model may be used in daily practice are described: development, validation, and impact assessment. In the development phase, the focus is on model development commonly using a multivariable logistic (diagnostic) or survival (prognostic) regression analysis. The performance of the developed model is expressed by discrimination, calibration and (re-) classification. In the validation phase, the developed model is tested in a new set of patients using these same performance measures. This is important, as model performance is commonly poorer in a new set of patients, e.g. due to case-mix or domain differences. Finally, in the impact phase the ability of a prediction model to actually guide patient management is evaluated. Whereas in the development and validation phase single cohort designs are preferred, this last phase asks for comparative designs, ideally randomized designs; therapeutic management and outcomes after using the prediction model is compared to a control group not using the model (e.g. usual care).

摘要

风险预测模型可用于估计个体患有(诊断模型)或发展为特定疾病或结局(预后模型)的概率。在临床实践中,这些模型用于为患者提供信息并指导治疗管理。静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)领域的示例包括怀疑深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的 Wells 规则,以及最近用于估计首次无诱因 VTE 发作后复发风险的预测规则。本文描述了预测模型在日常实践中使用前推荐的三个阶段:开发、验证和影响评估。在开发阶段,重点是使用多变量逻辑(诊断)或生存(预后)回归分析进行模型开发。所开发模型的性能通过区分度、校准和(重新)分类来表示。在验证阶段,使用相同的性能指标在新的患者群体中测试开发的模型。这很重要,因为模型性能在新的患者群体中通常较差,例如由于病例组合或领域差异。最后,在影响阶段,评估预测模型实际指导患者管理的能力。虽然在开发和验证阶段首选单队列设计,但最后一个阶段需要比较设计,理想情况下是随机设计;使用预测模型的治疗管理和结局与不使用模型的对照组(例如常规护理)进行比较。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models.诊断和预后预测模型。
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jun;11 Suppl 1:129-41. doi: 10.1111/jth.12262.
2
Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism following treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: systematic review, prognostic model and clinical decision rule, and economic evaluation.首次特发性静脉血栓栓塞症治疗后静脉血栓栓塞症复发风险的预测:系统评价、预后模型与临床决策规则以及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(12):i-xxxiii, 1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta20120.
3
External validation of the DASH prediction rule: a retrospective cohort study.DASH 预测规则的外部验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct;15(10):1963-1970. doi: 10.1111/jth.13781. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
4
Risk of recurrence after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: external validation of the Vienna Prediction Model with pooled individual patient data.首次无诱因静脉血栓栓塞后复发的风险:使用汇集的个体患者数据对维也纳预测模型进行外部验证。
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 May;13(5):775-81. doi: 10.1111/jth.12871. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
5
Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.基层医疗中排除肺栓塞:“整体判断”与韦尔斯法则诊断性能的比较
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):227-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.1930.
6
Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for the recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following treatment for a first unprovoked VTE.首次特发性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)治疗后静脉血栓栓塞症复发的预后模型系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 3;2:91. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-91.
7
Prediction of recurrent venous thrombosis in all patients with a first venous thrombotic event: The Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prediction model (L-TRRiP).首次静脉血栓栓塞事件后所有患者复发性静脉血栓的预测:莱顿血栓复发风险预测模型(L-TRRiP)。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 11;16(10):e1002883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002883. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-treatment of first unprovoked VTE.首次特发性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)治疗后复发性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)预后模型的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 6;6(5):e011190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011190.
9
Could a D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio have a role in ruling-out venous thromboembolism?D-二聚体/纤维蛋白原比值在排除静脉血栓栓塞症中的作用?
Emerg Med J. 2022 Dec;39(12):941-944. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210688. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
10
[Clinical features of patients with venous thromboembolism: 177 case analysis in 10 years].[静脉血栓栓塞症患者的临床特征:10年177例病例分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Apr;31(4):453-457. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction model developed on the basis of meta-analysis in the field of medicine: a systematic survey and methodological summaries.基于医学领域荟萃分析开发的预测模型:系统综述与方法总结。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02639-6.
2
Anthropometric Measurements for Predicting Low Appendicular Lean Mass Index for the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia: A Machine Learning Model.用于预测低四肢瘦体重指数以诊断肌肉减少症的人体测量学指标:一种机器学习模型
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jul 17;10(3):276. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10030276.
3
Pancreatic Cancer Risk Assessment Tools in Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.
初级保健中的胰腺癌风险评估工具:一项混合方法的系统评价。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jun 5;56(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01229-5.
4
Prediction models for adjacent vertebral fractures after vertebral augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.椎体强化术后相邻椎体骨折的预测模型:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2025 May;34(5):1631-1640. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08785-1. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
5
Prognostic risk prediction model for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD): a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)患者预后风险预测模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Respir Res. 2024 Nov 14;25(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03033-4.
6
Palmitoleic and oleic fatty acids as biomarkers for coronary heart disease: A predictive model.棕榈油酸和油酸作为冠心病生物标志物:一种预测模型。
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;194(1):59-70. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03839-7. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
7
Diagnostic models to predict structural spinal osteoarthritis on lumbar radiographs in older adults with back pain: Development and internal validation.预测老年背痛患者腰椎X光片上脊柱结构型骨关节炎的诊断模型:开发与内部验证
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024 Jul 22;6(3):100506. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100506. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Development of a diagnostic predictive model for determining child stunting in Malawi: a comparative analysis of variable selection approaches.开发马拉维儿童发育迟缓诊断预测模型:变量选择方法的比较分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02283-6.
9
Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model for predicting quality of recovery up to 1 week after surgery.开发和外部验证一个临床预测模型,用于预测手术后 1 周内的恢复质量。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):387. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50518-1.
10
Risk assessment and clinical prediction model of planned transfer to the ICU after hip arthroplasty in elderly individuals.老年髋部手术后转入 ICU 的计划风险评估和临床预测模型。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02204-2.