Center for Addiction Research and Education, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800623, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Oct;45(4):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
The previously published randomized controlled trial, EARLY, tested the efficacy of a motivational interviewing (MI) plus feedback condition against a video information (VI) condition and an informational brochure (IB) condition in reducing drinking and/or increasing contraception effectiveness, and found that drinking and rates of effective contraception improved in all conditions. In this reanalysis of the data from EARLY, potential moderating effects of depressive, global distress, and anxiety symptoms in response to the three brief interventions to reduce alcohol exposed pregnancy risk were examined. Women with higher levels of depression at baseline reported greater improvements in the MI plus feedback condition versus the VI and IB conditions with depression moderating both drinking and contraceptive effectiveness. Global distress moderated only drinking behavior in the MI plus feedback but not other groups and anxiety was not a moderator of outcome in any of the intervention groups. Depressed or distressed women at risk for AEP may benefit from an AEP risk reduction intervention that incorporates interaction with a treatment provider versus educational information provided via video or written materials.
先前发表的随机对照试验 EARLY 测试了动机性访谈 (MI) 加反馈条件与视频信息 (VI) 条件和信息手册 (IB) 条件在减少饮酒和/或提高避孕效果方面的疗效,发现所有条件下的饮酒量和有效避孕率都有所提高。在对 EARLY 数据的重新分析中,研究了抑郁、全球困扰和焦虑症状对减少酒精暴露妊娠风险的三种简短干预措施的反应的潜在调节作用。与 VI 和 IB 条件相比,基线时抑郁程度较高的女性在 MI 加反馈条件下报告的饮酒量和避孕效果改善更大,抑郁症调节了饮酒和避孕效果。全球困扰仅调节 MI 加反馈条件下的饮酒行为,而其他组则没有,焦虑在任何干预组中都不是结果的调节因素。有 AEP 风险的抑郁或困扰的女性可能会受益于 AEP 风险降低干预措施,该措施包括与治疗提供者互动,而不是通过视频或书面材料提供教育信息。