Geisner Irene M, Varvil-Weld Lindsey, Mittmann Angela J, Mallett Kimberly, Turrisi Rob
Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1100 NE 45th Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Biobehavioral Health Bldg., University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Addict Behav. 2015 Mar;42:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.030. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
College is a time of increased risk for problematic alcohol use and depressed mood. The comorbidity of these conditions is well documented, but is less well understood, with few interventions designed to prevent or reduce the related consequences. The current study evaluated a web-based personalized intervention for students (N=311) who reported an AUDIT score of 8 or more, a BDI-II score of 14 or more, and reported drinking four (women) or five (men) or more drinks on at least one occasion in the past month.
Invited participants were randomly selected from all enrolled undergraduates at a large, public, Pacific Northwestern University. Participants completed a screening and baseline assessment, and those who met study eligibility criteria were randomized to one of four conditions (alcohol only, depressed mood only, integrated, and referral-only control). Follow-up occurred one-month post-intervention.
While no main effects for the interventions were found, there were moderation effects, such that students in the alcohol only and integrated conditions who had lower levels of depressed mood or alcohol-related problems at baseline showed greater reductions in alcohol-related problems at follow-up compared to students in the control condition. Implications for interventions are discussed.
大学时期是出现酒精使用问题和情绪低落风险增加的阶段。这些情况的共病现象有充分记录,但人们对此了解较少,旨在预防或减少相关后果的干预措施也很少。本研究评估了一种针对学生(N = 311)的基于网络的个性化干预措施,这些学生报告的酒精使用障碍鉴定测试(AUDIT)分数为8分或更高,贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)分数为14分或更高,并且报告在过去一个月中至少有一次饮用了四杯(女性)或五杯(男性)或更多的酒。
受邀参与者是从一所大型公立西北太平洋大学的所有注册本科生中随机选取的。参与者完成了筛查和基线评估,符合研究资格标准的人被随机分配到四种情况之一(仅酒精干预、仅情绪低落干预、综合干预和仅转介对照)。干预后一个月进行随访。
虽然未发现干预措施的主要效果,但存在调节效应,即与对照条件下的学生相比,基线时情绪低落或与酒精相关问题水平较低的仅酒精干预和综合干预条件下的学生在随访时与酒精相关问题的减少幅度更大。文中讨论了干预措施的意义。