Suppr超能文献

农村社区居住的老年人的调查方法和应答率。

Survey methods and response rates among rural community dwelling older adults.

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2013 Jul-Aug;62(4):286-91. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182987b32.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rural older adults are not often targeted for surveys, and little is known about survey response rates in this population. Because overall numbers of rural older adults are small, it is important to consider techniques to improve their survey response rates.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to work with community partners to determine whether rural older adults participating in a rural county home-delivered meals program were more likely to respond to an injury risk survey hand-delivered via the postal service or hand-delivered by the home-delivered meals drivers.

METHODS

All home-delivered meals clients older than 65 years old were randomized to one of two groups. One group (n = 70) received the following via the postal service: a prenotice letter, a survey packet containing a description of the survey, the survey, a stamped and addressed return envelope, and a reminder/thank-you card. Older adults in the other group (n = 69) were personally handed the survey packet by the home-delivered meals driver.

RESULTS

The overall survey response rate was 43.9%. Older adults who were handed the survey packets by the home-delivered meals drivers were older and significantly more likely to return the survey (57%) compared with those who received survey materials in the mail (31%). Only 27% of respondents agreed to be contacted regarding participation in future face-to-face interviews. When taking into account response rates, postage costs alone were over five times higher for the postal-delivered surveys compared with the hand-delivered surveys.

DISCUSSION

By working with community partners, we were able to determine that older adults in a rural community were more likely to respond to surveys personally handed to them by someone they knew.

摘要

背景

农村老年人通常不是调查的目标人群,对于这一人群的调查应答率知之甚少。由于农村老年人的总数较少,因此采用一些技术来提高他们的应答率非常重要。

目的

本研究的目的是与社区合作伙伴合作,确定参加农村县上门送餐计划的农村老年人是否更有可能通过邮寄方式或由上门送餐司机亲自交送来回答受伤风险调查。

方法

所有 65 岁以上的上门送餐客户均被随机分为两组。一组(n=70)通过邮寄方式收到以下物品:预先通知信、包含调查说明的调查包、调查、已贴邮票并写好地址的回邮信封和提醒/感谢卡。另一组(n=69)的老年人由上门送餐司机亲自交送调查包。

结果

总体调查应答率为 43.9%。由上门送餐司机交送调查包的老年人年龄更大,且显著更有可能返回调查(57%),而通过邮寄方式收到调查材料的老年人应答率(31%)较低。只有 27%的受访者同意在未来接受关于参与面对面访谈的联系。考虑到应答率,仅邮费一项,邮寄调查的成本就比上门送餐调查高出五倍以上。

讨论

通过与社区合作伙伴合作,我们能够确定农村社区的老年人更有可能对亲自交给他们的调查做出回应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验