Lavelle Katrina, Todd Chris, Campbell Malcolm
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, University Place, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 28;8:113. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-113.
Studies largely from the market research field suggest that the inclusion of a stamped addressed envelope, rather than a pre-paid business reply, increases the response rate to mail surveys. The evidence that this is also the case regarding patient mail surveys is limited.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether stamped addressed envelopes increase response rates to patient mail surveys compared to pre-paid business reply envelopes and compare the relative costs. A sample of 477 initial non-responders to a mail survey of patients attending breast clinics in Greater Manchester between 1/10/2002 - 31/7/2003 were entered into the trial: 239 were randomly allocated to receive a stamped envelope and 238 to receive a pre-paid envelope in with their reminder surveys. Overall cost and per item returned were calculated.
The response to the stamped envelope group was 31.8% (95% CI: 25.9% - 37.7%) compared to 26.9% (21.3% - 32.5%) for the pre-paid group. The difference (4.9% 95% CI: -3.3% - 13.1%) is not significant at alpha = 0.05 (chi2 = 1.39; 2 tailed test, d.f. = 1; P = 0.239). The stamped envelopes were cheaper in terms of cost per returned item (1.20 pounds) than the pre-paid envelopes (1.67 pounds). However if the set up cost for the licence to use the pre-paid service is excluded, the cost of the stamped envelopes is more expensive than pre-paid returns (1.20 pounds versus 0.73 pounds).
Compared with pre-paid business replies, stamped envelopes did not produce a statistically significant increase in response rate to this patient survey. However, the response gain of the stamped strategy (4.9%) is similar to that demonstrated in a Cochrane review (5.3%) of strategies to increase response to general mail surveys. Further studies and meta analyses of patient responses to mail surveys via stamped versus pre-paid envelopes are needed with sufficient power to detect response gains of this magnitude in a patient population.
主要来自市场研究领域的研究表明,随附已盖章的回邮信封,而非预付费商业回函信封,会提高邮寄调查问卷的回复率。关于患者邮寄调查问卷也是如此的证据有限。
本研究的目的是调查与预付费商业回函信封相比,已盖章的回邮信封是否会提高患者邮寄调查问卷的回复率,并比较相关成本。选取了2002年10月1日至2003年7月31日期间大曼彻斯特地区乳腺诊所患者邮寄调查问卷的477名初次未回复者作为样本纳入试验:239名被随机分配接收已盖章的信封,238名在其提醒调查问卷中接收预付费信封。计算了总成本和每件回复的成本。
已盖章信封组的回复率为31.8%(95%置信区间:25.9% - 37.7%),而预付费组为26.9%(21.3% - 32.5%)。差异(4.9%,95%置信区间:-3.3% - 13.1%)在α = 0.05时无统计学意义(卡方 = 1.39;双侧检验,自由度 = 1;P = 0.239)。就每件回复的成本而言,已盖章的信封(1.20英镑)比预付费信封(1.67英镑)更便宜。然而,如果排除使用预付费服务的许可证设置成本,已盖章信封的成本比预付费回函更贵(1.20英镑对0.73英镑)。
与预付费商业回函相比,已盖章的信封在本次患者调查中并未使回复率产生统计学上的显著提高。然而,已盖章策略的回复率提升(4.9%)与Cochrane系统评价中所展示的提高普通邮寄调查问卷回复率的策略的提升幅度(5.3%)相似。需要对患者通过已盖章信封与预付费信封对邮寄调查问卷的回复进行进一步研究和荟萃分析,要有足够的效力来检测在患者群体中这种幅度的回复率提升情况。