EA 3878 (GETBO), Department of Internal Medicine and Chest Diseases, Brest University Hospital, La Cavale Blanche Hospital, Brest, France.
Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct;100(4):1013-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
To compare the microparticle levels of women referred for unexplained pregnancy loss with those of parous controls.
Incident case-control study.
University medical center.
PATIENT(S): 124 women consecutively referred for unexplained pregnancy losses (two or more losses at or before 21 weeks of gestational age, or at least one later loss), and 273 parous women without pregnancy loss.
INTERVENTION(S): Numeration of circulating microparticles by flow cytometry after differentiation of subpopulations according to the expression of membrane-specific antigens (CD51, CD144, or CD146 for endothelial, CD41 for platelet, CD45 and CD66b for leukocyte and neutrophil microparticles).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Plasma levels of microparticles.
A relative hypercoagulable state assessed by thrombin generation test had been previously reported in such cases, so we hypothesized that this could be explained by an excess of procoagulant microparticles. The study women displayed statistically significantly lower platelet and higher endothelial microparticle levels than the controls. The parameters of the thrombin generation test were only correlated with the level of endothelial microparticles, with a low coefficient of Speerman's correlation (r=0.15).
CONCLUSION(S): The difference in microparticle levels between the patients and controls does not clearly explain the hypercoagulable state reported in the patients but could reflect chronic endothelium damage.
比较不明原因妊娠丢失患者和经产妇对照者的微粒体水平。
前瞻性病例对照研究。
大学医学中心。
124 例连续就诊的不明原因妊娠丢失患者(妊娠 21 周前或至少一次晚期妊娠丢失两次或以上)和 273 例无妊娠丢失的经产妇。
根据膜特异性抗原(内皮细胞的 CD51、CD144 或 CD146,血小板的 CD41,白细胞和中性粒细胞微粒体的 CD45 和 CD66b)的表达对亚群进行区分后,用流式细胞术计数循环微粒体。
微粒体血浆水平。
先前报道过此类病例存在凝血酶生成试验评估的相对高凝状态,因此我们假设这可能是由于促凝微粒体过多所致。研究患者的血小板水平明显低于对照组,而内皮细胞微粒体水平明显高于对照组。凝血酶生成试验的参数仅与内皮细胞微粒体水平相关,Spearman 相关系数低(r=0.15)。
患者和对照组之间的微粒体水平差异不能明确解释患者报告的高凝状态,但可能反映了慢性内皮损伤。