Suppr超能文献

多学科团队和家长在共同照顾患有长期疾病的儿童方面协商共同点:一项混合方法研究。

Multidisciplinary teams, and parents, negotiating common ground in shared-care of children with long-term conditions: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 8;13:264. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-264.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited negotiation around care decisions is believed to undermine collaborative working between parents of children with long-term conditions and professionals, but there is little evidence of how they actually negotiate their respective roles. Using chronic kidney disease as an exemplar this paper reports on a multi-method study of social interaction between multidisciplinary teams and parents as they shared clinical care.

METHODS

Phases 1 and 2: a telephone survey mapping multidisciplinary teams' parent-educative activities, and qualitative interviews with 112 professionals (Clinical-psychologists, Dietitians, Doctors, Nurses, Play-specialists, Pharmacists, Therapists and Social-workers) exploring their accounts of parent-teaching in the 12 British children's kidney units. Phase 3: six ethnographic case studies in two units involving observations of professional/parent interactions during shared-care, and individual interviews. We used an analytical framework based on concepts drawn from Communities of Practice and Activity Theory.

RESULTS

Professionals spoke of the challenge of explaining to each other how they are aware of parents' understanding of clinical knowledge, and described three patterns of parent-educative activity that were common across MDTs: Engaging parents in shared practice; Knowledge exchange and role negotiation, and Promoting common ground. Over time, professionals had developed a shared repertoire of tools to support their negotiations with parents that helped them accomplish common ground during the practice of shared-care. We observed mutual engagement between professionals and parents where a common understanding of the joint enterprise of clinical caring was negotiated.

CONCLUSIONS

For professionals, making implicit knowledge explicit is important as it can provide them with a language through which to articulate more clearly to each other what is the basis of their intuition-based hunches about parents' support needs, and may help them to negotiate with parents and accelerate parents' learning about shared caring. Our methodology and results are potentially transferrable to shared management of other conditions.

摘要

背景

人们认为,在照顾决策方面的协商有限,会破坏长期患病儿童的父母与专业人员之间的协作工作,但几乎没有证据表明他们实际上是如何协商各自的角色的。本文以慢性肾脏病为例,报告了一项多方法研究,研究了多学科团队与父母在共享临床护理时的社会互动。

方法

第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段:一项电话调查,绘制了多学科团队的家长教育活动图,并对 112 名专业人员(临床心理学家、营养师、医生、护士、游戏专家、药剂师、治疗师和社会工作者)进行了定性访谈,探讨了他们在英国 12 个儿童肾脏科中对父母进行教学的情况。第 3 阶段:在两个单位进行了 6 个民族志案例研究,包括在共享护理期间观察专业人员/父母的互动以及进行个人访谈。我们使用了一个基于实践社区和活动理论概念的分析框架。

结果

专业人员谈到了向彼此解释他们如何了解父母对临床知识的理解的挑战,并描述了三种常见于多学科团队的家长教育活动模式:让父母参与共同实践;知识交流和角色协商,以及促进共同基础。随着时间的推移,专业人员已经开发出了一套共同的工具来支持他们与父母的协商,这些工具帮助他们在共享护理实践中达成共识。我们观察到专业人员和父母之间的相互参与,在这种参与中,双方共同协商了临床护理的联合企业的共同理解。

结论

对于专业人员来说,将隐性知识显性化很重要,因为它可以为他们提供一种语言,通过这种语言,他们可以更清楚地相互表达他们基于直觉的关于父母支持需求的猜测的基础,并且可能帮助他们与父母协商并加速父母对共享护理的学习。我们的方法和结果可能适用于其他疾病的共同管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e086/3720539/983f25ea7b46/1472-6963-13-264-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验