• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“这危及生命,但我不在乎”。一项使用照片引发访谈的定性研究,以探索青少年的肾脏替代治疗经历。

'It is life threatening but I don't mind'. A qualitative study using photo elicitation interviews to explore adolescents' experiences of renal replacement therapies.

作者信息

Wells F, Ritchie D, McPherson A C

机构信息

Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2013 Jul;39(4):602-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01399.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01399.x
PMID:22676493
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) transforms the life prospects of young people with established renal failure. However, these treatments can have significant physiological and psychological implications for adolescents as they prepare to transition into adulthood. Health policies increasingly emphasize children and youth's active participation and consultation as users of health services, yet studies infrequently seek their experiences directly.

METHODS

Adolescents receiving RRT in a large UK teaching hospital took photographs illustrating the impact of their condition and treatment on their lives. Qualitative photo elicitation interviews were conducted to explore the significance of the images and the young person's experiences. Interviews were analysed using descriptive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ten young people aged 13-17 years participated. Themes identified were: (1) understanding and acceptance of treatment; (2) living in a non-functioning body; (3) impact upon daily life; (4) sources of support. Young people found treatments challenging and experienced significant impact on relationships and daily routines. Yet, health was prioritized over body image and participants demonstrated great emotional resilience. Young people valued support from family and friends, although were wary of disclosing their condition in case it resulted in being highlighted as different. Young people reported hospital staff as being caring and professional, but their biggest virtue appeared to be their willingness to treat the young people as 'normal'.

CONCLUSIONS

Young people engaged readily with the research, and frankly described the impact of RRT on their everyday lives. Service providers must ensure that adolescents' developmental needs are met as traditional tasks of adolescence may lose priority. However, it is also clear that young people's ability to cope with treatments should not be underestimated.

摘要

背景

肾脏替代疗法(RRT)改变了患有终末期肾衰竭的年轻人的生活前景。然而,这些治疗方法在青少年准备步入成年期时,可能会对他们产生重大的生理和心理影响。卫生政策越来越强调儿童和青少年作为卫生服务使用者的积极参与和咨询,但研究很少直接探寻他们的经历。

方法

在英国一家大型教学医院接受RRT治疗的青少年拍摄了照片,展示他们的病情和治疗对其生活的影响。通过定性照片启发照片启发式访谈来探究这些照片的意义以及年轻人的经历。访谈采用描述性主题分析进行分析。

结果

10名年龄在13至17岁之间的年轻人参与了研究。确定的主题有:(1)对治疗的理解和接受;(2)生活在机能失调的身体中;(3)对日常生活的影响;(4)支持来源。年轻人发现治疗颇具挑战性,且对人际关系和日常生活产生了重大影响。然而,健康比身体形象更受重视,参与者展现出了很强的情绪恢复力。年轻人重视家人和朋友的支持,尽管他们担心透露自己的病情会导致被视为异类。年轻人表示医院工作人员关心且专业,但他们最大的优点似乎是愿意将年轻人当作“正常人”来对待。

结论

年轻人积极参与了这项研究,并坦率地描述了RRT对他们日常生活的影响。服务提供者必须确保满足青少年的发展需求,因为青少年的传统任务可能不再是首要任务。然而,同样明显的是,年轻人应对治疗的能力不应被低估。

相似文献

1
'It is life threatening but I don't mind'. A qualitative study using photo elicitation interviews to explore adolescents' experiences of renal replacement therapies.“这危及生命,但我不在乎”。一项使用照片引发访谈的定性研究,以探索青少年的肾脏替代治疗经历。
Child Care Health Dev. 2013 Jul;39(4):602-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01399.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
2
Adolescents' experiences of well-being when living with a long-term illness or disability.青少年身患长期疾病或残疾时的幸福体验。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Dec;21(4):419-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00490.x.
3
Young adults' perspectives on living with kidney failure: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.年轻人对肾衰竭生活的看法:定性研究的系统评价与主题综合
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e019926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019926.
4
Living with epilepsy in adolescence-A qualitative study of young people's experiences in Singapore: Peer socialization, autonomy, and self-esteem.青少年癫痫患者的生活——一项关于新加坡年轻人经历的定性研究:同伴社交、自主性和自尊
Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Mar;45(2):241-250. doi: 10.1111/cch.12648.
5
The experience of fatigue for adults living with HIV.感染艾滋病毒的成年人的疲劳体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Sep;15(9):1123-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01343.x.
6
How and Why School Is Important to Teenagers with Cancer: Outcomes from a Photo-Elicitation Study.青少年癌症患者为何以及为何学校教育很重要:照片激发研究的结果。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019 Apr;8(2):157-164. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0068. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
7
'Everybody just thinks I'm weird': a qualitative exploration of the psychosocial experiences of adolescents with Tourette syndrome.“每个人都觉得我很怪异”:对抽动秽语综合征青少年心理社会经历的质性探索
Child Care Health Dev. 2013 Nov;39(6):880-6. doi: 10.1111/cch.12033. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
8
Daily living with distress and enrichment: the moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home.带着痛苦与充实生活:家中有使用呼吸机辅助的孩子的家庭的道德体验。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):e48-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0789.
9
Young adults' (16-25 years) suggestions for providing developmentally appropriate diabetes services: a qualitative study.年轻人(16 - 25岁)对提供适合其发育阶段的糖尿病服务的建议:一项定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Sep;13(5):409-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00577.x.
10
Living as an adolescent with HIV in Zambia -- lived experiences, sexual health and reproductive needs.在赞比亚作为一名感染艾滋病毒的青少年生活——生活经历、性健康和生殖需求。
AIDS Care. 2012;24(10):1204-10. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.658755. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
2
A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments.儿童和青少年慢性非癌症疼痛及其家庭对自身状况、疼痛服务和治疗的体验和理解的元人种学研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 5;10(10):CD014873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014873.pub2.
3
Using photovoice to understand and improve healthy lifestyles of people diagnosed with serious mental illness.
运用摄影展的方式来理解和改善被诊断患有严重精神疾病的人群的健康生活方式。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Oct;29(5):676-687. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12863. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
4
Lived experiences of adolescents with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.青少年酒精谱系障碍的生活体验。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Dec;64(12):1547-1555. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15290. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
"I Don't Like to Make a Big Thing out of It": A Qualitative Interview-Based Study Exploring Factors Affecting Whether Young People Tell or Do Not Tell Their Friends about Their IBD.“我不想小题大做”:一项基于定性访谈的研究,探讨影响年轻人是否向朋友透露自身炎症性肠病的因素。
Int J Chronic Dis. 2020 Jun 11;2020:1059025. doi: 10.1155/2020/1059025. eCollection 2020.
6
Why is transition between child and adult services a dangerous time for young people with chronic kidney disease? A mixed-method systematic review.为什么儿童和成人服务之间的过渡对患有慢性肾脏病的年轻人来说是一个危险的时期?一项混合方法系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 2;13(8):e0201098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201098. eCollection 2018.
7
The under reporting of recruitment strategies in research with children with life-threatening illnesses: A systematic review.对患有危及生命疾病儿童的研究中招募策略报告不足的情况:一项系统综述。
Palliat Med. 2017 May;31(5):419-436. doi: 10.1177/0269216316663856. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
8
Effective peer-to-peer support for young people with end-stage renal disease: a mixed methods evaluation of Camp COOL.《终末期肾病青少年有效同伴支持:酷营混合方法评价》。
BMC Nephrol. 2013 Dec 21;14:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-279.
9
Multidisciplinary teams, and parents, negotiating common ground in shared-care of children with long-term conditions: a mixed methods study.多学科团队和家长在共同照顾患有长期疾病的儿童方面协商共同点:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 8;13:264. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-264.