Leeder Jade E, Horsley Ian G, Herrington Lee C
1Physiotherapy Department, English Institute of Sport, Manchester, United Kingdom; and 2University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Sep;30(9):2591-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1ff1d.
Elias JE. The inter-rater reliability of the functional movement screen within an athletic population using untrained raters. J Strength Cond Res 30(9): 2591-2599, 2016-The functional movement screen (FMS) is a commonly used screening tool designed to identify restrictions to movement patterns and increased injury risk using 7 predesigned tests. The purpose of this study was to analyze the inter-rater reliability of scoring of the FMS using a group of "untrained" subjects. Additionally, the study also examined if clinical experience level had any effect on reliability. Twenty fully qualified Physiotherapists working at the English Institute of Sport, with elite athletes, volunteered to participate in the study. The group comprised both level 2 and level 3 physiotherapists based on clinical experience levels. Five elite athletes, free from injury, were recruited and videoed completing 6 of the 7 FMS tests using a 3 camera system. The videos were scored by each Physiotherapist using the standardized scoring sheet, as developed by Cook et al. Each practitioner marked each athlete completing the 6 tests. The total scores were calculated for each athlete (maximum score of 18). The inter-rater reliability of the test was shown to be high, intraclass coefficient 0.906. An independent t test showed no significant differences between the level 2 and level 3 practitioners in the total scores (p = 0.502). The results of the test indicate that the FMS is a reliable screening tool when used by untrained practitioners in determining faulty movement patterns and that clinical experience level does not affect the reliability, therefore it may be a useful tool in the screening of athletic populations.
伊莱亚斯·J·E。使用未经培训的评估者对运动员群体进行功能性动作筛查时评估者间的信度。《力量与体能研究杂志》30(9): 2591 - 2599, 2016年——功能性动作筛查(FMS)是一种常用的筛查工具,旨在通过7项预先设计的测试来识别运动模式的限制因素和增加的受伤风险。本研究的目的是分析使用一组“未经培训”的受试者对FMS评分的评估者间信度。此外,该研究还考察了临床经验水平是否对信度有任何影响。20名在英国体育学院与精英运动员合作的合格物理治疗师自愿参与该研究。根据临床经验水平,该组包括2级和3级物理治疗师。招募了5名无伤病的精英运动员,使用三摄像头系统对他们完成7项FMS测试中的6项进行录像。每位物理治疗师使用库克等人制定的标准化评分表对录像进行评分。每位从业者对完成6项测试的每位运动员进行评分。计算出每位运动员的总分(满分18分)。测试的评估者间信度显示很高,组内相关系数为0.906。独立t检验显示,2级和3级从业者在总分上没有显著差异(p = 0.502)。测试结果表明,FMS在由未经培训的从业者用于确定错误运动模式时是一种可靠的筛查工具,并且临床经验水平不会影响信度,因此它可能是筛查运动员群体的一种有用工具。