Suppr超能文献

功能性运动筛查的组内信度。

Interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Evansville, Evansville, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):479-86. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c09c04.

Abstract

The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a series of 7 tests that categorize fundamental movement. Each test is scored on an ordinal scale with 4 categories. The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater reliability of the FMS. Forty healthy subjects were videotaped while performing the FMS. The videos were independently scored by 4 raters, including 2 experts who instruct FMS training courses and 2 novices who completed a standardized training course on the FMS. Interrater reliability was analyzed using the weighted kappa statistic. The novice raters demonstrated excellent or substantial agreement on 14 of the 17 tests, whereas the expert raters did the same on 13 of the 17 tests. When the novice raters were paired with the expert raters, all 17 components demonstrated excellent or substantial agreement. These data indicate that the FMS can confidently be applied by trained individuals. This would suggest that the FMS can be confidently used to assess the movement patterns of athletes and to make decisions related to interventions for performance enhancement, and the FMS may assist in identifying athletes at risk for injury.

摘要

功能性运动筛查(FMS)是一系列 7 项测试,用于对基本运动进行分类。每项测试都按照序数量表进行评分,分为 4 个等级。本研究旨在确定 FMS 的评分者间信度。40 名健康受试者在进行 FMS 测试时被拍摄视频。这些视频由 4 名评分者独立评分,其中包括 2 名教授 FMS 培训课程的专家和 2 名完成 FMS 标准化培训课程的新手。使用加权 Kappa 统计分析评分者间信度。17 项测试中的 14 项测试,新手评分者的一致性达到优秀或高度一致,而专家评分者在 17 项测试中的 13 项测试中也达到了相同的一致性。当新手评分者与专家评分者配对时,所有 17 项测试均达到优秀或高度一致。这些数据表明,受过培训的人员可以自信地应用 FMS。这表明 FMS 可以自信地用于评估运动员的运动模式,并做出与提高运动表现相关的干预决策,FMS 可能有助于识别有受伤风险的运动员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验