Suppr超能文献

一次性培训课程后未经训练的本科评估者之间功能动作筛查测试的评分者间信度

Interrater Reliability of Functional Movement Screening Test among Untrained Undergraduate Raters Undergoing a One-off Training Session.

作者信息

Ab Malik Zulezwan, Abd Kadir Fadlin Sakina, Iffah Engku Nurul Izzatul, Yussof Muhamad Hakimi M, Ismail M Nur Asraf, Malek Nor Fazila Abd, Md Nadzalan Ali, Hashim Hairul Anuar

机构信息

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.

School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kelantan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Malays J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;32(1):121-126. doi: 10.21315/mjms-09-2024-740. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional Movement Screen (FMS)™ can be a valuable tool for assessing movement patterns and identifying potential movement dysfunctions. However, it is limited in terms of subjectivity and consistency of the ratings, especially among less proficient raters. Knowledge of minimally required training thresholds will provide valuable information on training adequacy. Thus, this study aimed to determine the interrater reliability of FMS™ among completely novice raters undergoing a one-off training session.

METHODS

Twenty active adults with no musculoskeletal injuries or muscular dysfunction performed seven FMS™ tasks while being recorded. Subsequently, 12 novice raters with no prior knowledge and skills about FMS™ rated the recorded movement videos at a normal play speed and without rewinding.

RESULTS

The interrater reliability analysis of the composite FMS™ score revealed an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.60. Moreover, the mean coefficient for interrater reliability for the seven FMS™ components score is 0.35.

CONCLUSION

The results implied that a one-off FMS™ training produced a large variability in the rating consistency, especially for rotary stability, deep squats, and in-line lunge ratings.

摘要

背景

功能性动作筛查(FMS)™ 可以成为评估动作模式和识别潜在动作功能障碍的宝贵工具。然而,其评分的主观性和一致性存在局限,尤其是在不太熟练的评分者中。了解最低要求的训练阈值将为训练充足性提供有价值的信息。因此,本研究旨在确定在接受一次性训练课程的完全新手评分者中FMS™ 的评分者间信度。

方法

20名无肌肉骨骼损伤或肌肉功能障碍的活跃成年人在被记录的情况下完成七项FMS™ 任务。随后,12名对FMS™ 没有先验知识和技能的新手评分者以正常播放速度且不回放的方式对记录的动作视频进行评分。

结果

FMS™ 综合评分的评分者间信度分析显示组内相关系数(ICC)为0.60。此外,七项FMS™ 组件评分的评分者间信度平均系数为0.35。

结论

结果表明,一次性的FMS™ 训练在评分一致性方面产生了很大的变异性,尤其是在旋转稳定性、深蹲和直线弓箭步评分方面。

相似文献

3
The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.功能性运动筛查:可靠性研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;42(6):530-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3838. Epub 2012 May 14.
6
Interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.功能性运动筛查的组内信度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):479-86. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c09c04.
7
Test-retest and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.功能性运动测试的重测信度和评分者间信度。
J Athl Train. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):331-6. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.11. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

6

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验