Nahass R G, Weinstein M P
Department of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick 08903-0019.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 May-Jun;13(3):223-6. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(90)90063-2.
During a 5-month period, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of qualitative cultures of intravenous catheters submitted to a university hospital microbiology laboratory. Of 36 catheters submitted for culture from nonseptic patients, 10 (28%) grew one or more microorganisms on qualitative culture. Of 44 catheters cultured from septic patients, 20 (45%) grew one or more microorganisms, but only 5 grew microorganisms that also were isolated from blood cultures. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values for catheter-related bacteremia were 71%, 96%, and 17%, values similar to those reported for quantitative methods. Although acceptable in terms of sensitivity and specificity, the very low positive predictive value suggests that catheter-related bacteremia cannot be predicted reliably by this test. We conclude, therefore, that nonstandardized qualitative IV catheter cultures have minimal value as predictors of bacteremia and recommend that they not be performed in clinical microbiology laboratories.
在5个月的时间里,我们评估了提交至一所大学医院微生物实验室的静脉导管定性培养物的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。在从非脓毒症患者身上采集用于培养的36根导管中,10根(28%)在定性培养中培养出一种或多种微生物。在从脓毒症患者身上培养的44根导管中,20根(45%)培养出一种或多种微生物,但只有5根培养出的微生物也从血培养中分离出来。导管相关菌血症的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值分别为71%、96%和17%,这些值与定量方法报告的值相似。尽管在敏感性和特异性方面可以接受,但极低的阳性预测值表明该检测无法可靠地预测导管相关菌血症。因此,我们得出结论,非标准化的静脉导管定性培养作为菌血症的预测指标价值极小,并建议临床微生物实验室不要进行此类检测。