Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250, United States.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 7;19(25):3996-4000. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.3996.
To evaluate need for and efficacy of a structured gastroenterology didactic session in expanding awareness and understanding of digestive disorders.
A four-day symposium was developed with didactic sessions (days 1, 2) and practical endoscopy (days 3, 4). Didactic sessions included case presentations highlighting pathophysiology and management. One nurse and four practicing gastroenterologists from the United Kingdom led lectures and supervised workshops with audience participation. Practical endoscopy focused on diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and their application to diagnosis and treatment of ailments of the gastrointestinal tract. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires were distributed to participants during didactic sessions. A pre-workshop questionnaire gauged expectations and identified objectives to be met at the symposium. Post-workshop questionnaires were administered to assess efficacy of each session. Participants graded sessions from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) on quality of case presentations, knowledge, clarity and mode of presentation. We assessed if time allotted to each topic was sufficient, value of sessions, impact on practice and interest in future symposiums.
There were 46 attendees on day 1: 41% undergraduates, 41% residents, 11% consultants and 4% unspecified. Day 2 (a Saturday) had 24 participants: 17% undergraduates, 71% residents, 9% consultants, 4% unspecified. Primary pre-workshop symposium expectation was to gain knowledge in: general gastroenterology (55.5%), practical endoscopy (13.8%), pediatric gastroenterology (5%), epidemiology of gastrointestinal disorders specific to Zambia (6%), and interaction with international speakers (6%). The post-symposium questionnaire was answered by 19 participants, of whom 95% felt specific aims were met; all would attend future conferences and recommend to others.
The beneficial effect of a structured symposium in developing countries warrants further attention as a mechanism to improve disease awareness in areas where resources are limited.
评估结构化胃肠病学讲座在提高对消化疾病的认识和理解方面的必要性和效果。
设计了一个为期四天的研讨会,包括理论课程(第 1 天和第 2 天)和实际内镜检查(第 3 天和第 4 天)。理论课程包括病例介绍,强调病理生理学和管理。一位护士和来自英国的四位执业胃肠病学家主持讲座并监督有观众参与的研讨会。实际内镜检查侧重于诊断和治疗程序及其在胃肠道疾病的诊断和治疗中的应用。在理论课程期间,向参与者分发了会前和会后的调查问卷。会前问卷旨在了解参与者的期望并确定研讨会的目标。会后问卷用于评估每个课程的效果。参与者对课程的质量、知识、清晰度和呈现方式进行了 1(差)到 5(优)的评分。我们评估了每个主题的时间分配是否足够、课程的价值、对实践的影响以及对未来研讨会的兴趣。
第 1 天有 46 名参与者:41%是本科生,41%是住院医师,11%是顾问,4%未指明。第 2 天(星期六)有 24 名参与者:17%是本科生,71%是住院医师,9%是顾问,4%未指明。主要的会前研讨会期望是在以下方面获得知识:普通胃肠病学(55.5%)、实际内镜检查(13.8%)、儿科胃肠病学(5%)、赞比亚特定胃肠道疾病的流行病学(6%)以及与国际演讲者的互动(6%)。19 名参与者回答了会后问卷,其中 95%的人认为特定目标已经实现;所有人都将参加未来的会议,并向他人推荐。
在资源有限的地区,结构化研讨会在发展中国家具有有益的效果,值得进一步关注,作为提高疾病认识的一种机制。