Goyal Neeraj Kumar, Goel Apul, Sankhwar Satyanarayan, Dalela Divakar
Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, India.
ISRN Urol. 2013 Jun 11;2013:109505. doi: 10.1155/2013/109505. Print 2013.
Purpose. To present our experience of prostate abscess management by modified transurethral resection (TUR) technique. Methods. Seventeen men with prostate abscess undergoing TUR between 2003 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Details of demography, surgical procedures, complications, and followup were noted. Results. With a mean age of 61.53 ± 8.58 years, all patients had multifocal abscess cavities. Initially, 6 men underwent classical TUR similar to the technique used for benign prostatic enlargement (group 1). Next, 11 men underwent modified TUR (group 2) in which bladder neck and anterior zone were not resected. The abscess cavities resolved completely, and no patient required a second intervention. One patient in group 1 and three in group 2 had postoperative fever requiring parenteral antibiotics (P = 0.916). Three patients in group 1 had transient urinary incontinence, whereas none of the patients in group 2 had this complication (P = 0.055). Four and five men in group 1 and 2 reported retrograde ejaculation, respectively (P = 0.740). Conclusion. The modified technique of prostate resection edges over conventional TURP in the form of reduced morbidity but maintains its high success rate for complete abscess drainage. It alleviates the need for secondary procedures, having an apparent advantage over limited drainage techniques. Use of this technique is emphasized in cases associated with BPH and lack of proper preoperative imaging.
目的。介绍我们采用改良经尿道切除术(TUR)治疗前列腺脓肿的经验。方法。回顾性分析2003年至2011年间17例接受TUR治疗的前列腺脓肿患者。记录人口统计学、手术过程、并发症及随访的详细情况。结果。患者平均年龄为61.53±8.58岁,所有患者均有多灶性脓肿腔。最初,6例患者接受了类似于良性前列腺增生所用技术的经典TUR(第1组)。接下来,11例患者接受了改良TUR(第2组),其中膀胱颈和前区未切除。脓肿腔完全消退,无患者需要二次干预。第1组1例患者和第2组3例患者术后发热,需要静脉使用抗生素(P = 0.916)。第1组3例患者出现短暂性尿失禁,而第2组无患者出现此并发症(P = 0.055)。第1组和第2组分别有4例和5例患者报告逆行射精(P = 0.740)。结论。改良前列腺切除术在降低发病率方面优于传统经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP),但在完全引流脓肿方面仍保持高成功率。它减少了二次手术的需求,比有限引流技术具有明显优势。在伴有良性前列腺增生(BPH)且缺乏适当术前影像学检查的病例中,强调使用该技术。