Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 3;8(7):e68979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068979. Print 2013.
To investigate cognitive operations underlying sequential problem solving, we confronted ten Goffin's cockatoos with a baited box locked by five different inter-locking devices. Subjects were either naïve or had watched a conspecific demonstration, and either faced all devices at once or incrementally. One naïve subject solved the problem without demonstration and with all locks present within the first five sessions (each consisting of one trial of up to 20 minutes), while five others did so after social demonstrations or incremental experience. Performance was aided by species-specific traits including neophilia, a haptic modality and persistence. Most birds showed a ratchet-like progress, rarely failing to solve a stage once they had done it once. In most transfer tests subjects reacted flexibly and sensitively to alterations of the locks' sequencing and functionality, as expected from the presence of predictive inferences about mechanical interactions between the locks.
为了研究序列问题解决背后的认知操作,我们让十只戈芬氏凤头鹦鹉面对一个上锁的箱子,箱子由五个不同的互锁装置锁住。被试者要么是新手,要么观看了同类的演示,要么同时面对所有的装置,要么逐步面对。一个新手在没有演示的情况下,在最初的五轮实验(每轮包含一次长达 20 分钟的尝试)中解决了问题,而另外五个新手在观看了社会演示或逐步经验后解决了问题。特定于物种的特征,包括新奇感、触觉模态和坚持性,有助于解决问题。大多数鸟类表现出类似于棘轮的进展,一旦它们完成了一个阶段,很少会失败。在大多数转移测试中,被试者对锁的顺序和功能的变化反应灵活且敏感,这与对锁之间机械相互作用的预测推理的存在相符。