*Department of Psychological Sciences and Statistics, Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia; †Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; and ‡Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Nov;19(12):2704-15. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e318296ae5a.
Adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at a greater risk of anxiety and depression and impaired quality of life (QoL) compared with healthy controls and other chronic physical illness groups. Consequently, the development and evaluation of well-defined and theoretically robust psychotherapeutic interventions for adults with IBD are desirable. To date, interventions have, for the most part, used multiple cross-theoretical approaches. Published reviews are heterogeneous in terms both of categorization of psychotherapeutic approaches and also of conclusions relating to efficacy. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found no evidence for the efficacy of these interventions in adults, as in a number of previous reviews, ideologically disparate interventions (e.g., psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral) were grouped together. We aimed to extend the currently available literature on psychological intervention in IBD by: evaluating the efficacy of specific strategies (i.e., stress management, psychodynamic, cognitive behavioral therapy, or hypnosis) in improving psychological symptoms and QoL, including all controlled and noncontrolled studies, and explicating the methodological problems in published trials. Sixteen studies (5 stress management, 4 psychodynamic, 5 cognitive behavioral therapy, and 2 hypnosis) were evaluated. Interventions predominantly based on stress management showed only modest benefits for IBD or mental health symptoms or QoL. Cognitive behavioral therapy studies showed generally consistent benefits in terms of anxiety and depression symptoms, but inconsistent outcomes regarding IBD symptoms. Psychodynamically informed interventions reduced depressive and anxiety symptoms, but not IBD severity. Both hypnosis studies, albeit using different methods, seemed to have a more positive impact on disease severity than mental health symptoms or QoL. Our results suggest that while further well-designed and evaluated interventions are needed, psychological input can make a positive contribution to best practice multidisciplinary treatment of adults with IBD.
患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的成年人与健康对照组和其他慢性身体疾病组相比,患焦虑症和抑郁症以及生活质量受损的风险更高。因此,针对 IBD 成年人开发和评估明确的、理论上强大的心理治疗干预措施是可取的。迄今为止,干预措施在很大程度上使用了多种跨理论方法。已发表的综述在心理治疗方法的分类以及与疗效相关的结论方面存在异质性。最近对随机对照试验的 Cochrane 荟萃分析发现,这些干预措施在成年人中没有疗效证据,与之前的一些综述一样,意识形态不同的干预措施(例如心理动力学和认知行为疗法)被归为一组。我们旨在通过以下方式扩展目前关于 IBD 心理干预的文献:评估特定策略(即压力管理、心理动力学、认知行为疗法或催眠)在改善心理症状和生活质量方面的疗效,包括所有对照和非对照研究,并阐明已发表试验中的方法学问题。评估了 16 项研究(5 项压力管理、4 项心理动力学、5 项认知行为疗法和 2 项催眠)。主要基于压力管理的干预措施仅对 IBD 或心理健康症状或生活质量有适度的益处。认知行为疗法研究通常表明在焦虑和抑郁症状方面有一致的益处,但在 IBD 症状方面的结果不一致。心理动力学干预可减轻抑郁和焦虑症状,但不能减轻 IBD 严重程度。尽管使用了不同的方法,但两项催眠研究似乎对疾病严重程度的影响比对心理健康症状或生活质量的影响更为积极。我们的研究结果表明,虽然需要进一步设计良好且经过评估的干预措施,但心理干预可以为患有 IBD 的成年人的最佳多学科治疗实践做出积极贡献。