Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;170(11):1263-74. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12101339.
Developing categorical diagnoses that have biological meaning within the clinical phenotype of psychosis (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar I disorder with psychosis) is as important for developing targeted treatments as for nosological goals. The Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) was formed to examine a broad array of intermediate phenotypes across psychotic disorders and to test the hypothesis that intermediate phenotype characteristics are homogeneous within phenomenologically derived DSM-IV diagnoses.
The consortium recruited 933 stable probands with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or psychotic bipolar I disorder, 1,055 of their first-degree relatives, and 459 healthy comparison subjects for clinical characterization and dense phenotyping. Clinical, psychosocial, and family characteristics were contrasted.
All proband groups showed lower psychosocial functioning than the relatives or comparison group. On average, schizophrenia probands showed more symptoms and lower psychosocial functioning than probands with psychotic bipolar disorder, but there was considerable overlap in clinical manifestations. The characteristics of schizoaffective disorder were more often similar to schizophrenia than to psychotic bipolar disorder. The rates of lifetime suicide attempts were high across all proband groups, with the highest reported frequencies in the schizoaffective and bipolar groups. Proband family lineages included both families with "pure" psychosis diagnoses and families with mixed schizophrenia-bipolar diagnoses.
Symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and familial lineage overlap across the three DSM-IV psychosis diagnoses used in B-SNIP. The comingling of psychosis diagnoses within families suggests overlapping genetic determinants across psychoses. These data provide scant evidence for distinct phenotypic clustering around traditional phenomenological diagnoses.
在精神病(精神分裂症、分裂情感障碍和伴有精神病性症状的双相情感障碍)的临床表型内,为具有生物学意义的类别诊断的制定是与分类学目标同等重要的,这对于开发针对性治疗方法非常重要。双相-精神分裂症网络中间表型(B-SNIP)的成立旨在检查广泛的中间表型在精神病性障碍中,并检验中间表型特征在基于现象学的 DSM-IV 诊断内是同质的这一假设。
该联盟招募了 933 名稳定的精神分裂症、分裂情感障碍或伴有精神病性症状的双相情感障碍患者、1055 名他们的一级亲属和 459 名健康对照者进行临床特征描述和密集表型分析。比较了临床、心理社会和家庭特征。
所有患者组的心理社会功能均低于亲属或对照组。平均而言,精神分裂症患者的症状比伴有精神病性症状的双相情感障碍患者更多,心理社会功能更差,但临床表现有很大的重叠。分裂情感障碍的特征更常与精神分裂症相似,而不是与伴有精神病性症状的双相情感障碍。所有患者组的终生自杀企图率都很高,分裂情感障碍和双相情感障碍组报告的频率最高。患者家族中有“纯”精神病诊断的家族,也有混合精神分裂症-双相诊断的家族。
B-SNIP 中使用的三种 DSM-IV 精神病诊断的症状、心理社会功能和家族谱系都有重叠。家族内混合使用精神病诊断表明精神病之间存在重叠的遗传决定因素。这些数据几乎没有提供围绕传统现象学诊断的明显表型聚类的证据。