• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期手术腰椎间盘切除术术后等待时间对疼痛强度的影响。

The effect of waiting time on pain intensity after elective surgical lumbar discectomy.

机构信息

School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, University of British Columbia, 6133-818 W. 10th Ave., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M9; Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, 3114 - 910 West 10th Ave., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M9.

出版信息

Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1736-48. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.038
PMID:23850131
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Waitlists are commonly used in Canada to manage access to surgical procedures such as elective surgical lumbar discectomy (ESLD). The timing of enrollment onto the waitlist is important as this is a proxy measure for the concordance of preferences for surgery between a patient and surgeon. After enrollment, the waiting time to actual surgery extends the duration of preoperative symptoms, which possibly affects the outcome of ESLD. Waiting time also specifically reflects the delay in service delivery imposed by the limited capacity of the health-care system.

PURPOSE

To determine if a system-imposed delay in treatment, that is, longer waiting time, for ESLD is associated with a higher odds of experiencing residual postoperative pain.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Ambidirectional cohort study with 2-year retrospective and 3-year prospective components, conducted at a major tertiary care center serving a metropolitan area in Canada.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients aged 16 years or older with sciatica because of herniated lumbar disc, confirmed on advanced imaging, were recruited at the time of waitlist enrollment for ESLD. Patients with significant comorbidity or emergency indications for surgery were excluded. Of 391 participants, 291 had complete follow-up information at 6 months postoperatively.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Intensity of the predominant symptom (worse of either back or leg pain) was assessed on the 11-point numerical rating scale at waitlist enrollment and 6 months postoperatively. Pain scores were highly skewed and therefore categorized into four ordinal levels defined by quartiles.

METHODS

For the primary analysis, time to surgery from waitlist enrollment was dichotomized based on a predetermined clinically meaningful cut-point of 12 weeks. Ordinal logistic regression was used to compare the odds of experiencing higher pain intensity between wait groups. Control of confounders was achieved using both propensity scores and conventional multivariable modeling.

RESULTS

In unadjusted analyses, long-wait patients were 80% more likely than short-wait patients to experience higher ordinal pain intensity at 6 months; unadjusted proportional odds ratio (POR)=1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.8). The association held after controlling for all imbalances in measured confounders, with long-wait patients still being 70% more likely to report worse pain; adjusted POR=1.7 (95% CI, 1.0-2.8).

CONCLUSIONS

A waiting time of 12 weeks or more after waitlist enrollment for ESLD is associated with a modest likelihood of experiencing worse pain at 6 months postoperatively. This result was not because of differences in measured confounders. Future studies are encouraged to identify other, as-of-yet unmeasured, variables that might be associated with both longer waiting times and worse outcomes among ESLD patients. Until then, in jurisdictions where highly constrained access to ESLD is managed through waitlists, the expected waiting time for the operation could be an informative deciding criterion for patients with otherwise unresolved preferences for operative treatment.

摘要

背景

在加拿大,候诊名单通常用于管理手术(如选择性手术腰椎间盘切除术(ESLD))的就诊机会。登记到候诊名单上的时间很重要,因为这是患者和外科医生对手术偏好一致性的代理指标。登记后,实际手术前的等待时间延长了术前症状的持续时间,这可能会影响 ESLD 的结果。等待时间还具体反映了医疗保健系统能力有限所导致的服务提供延迟。

目的

确定 ESLD 治疗的系统延迟(即较长的等待时间)是否与术后残留疼痛的可能性更高相关。

研究设计/设置:在加拿大一个主要的三级保健中心进行了一项具有 2 年回顾性和 3 年前瞻性部分的双向队列研究。

患者样本

在 ESLD 等候名单上登记时,招募了年龄在 16 岁或以上的因椎间盘突出而出现坐骨神经痛、经高级影像学证实的患者。患有严重合并症或紧急手术指征的患者被排除在外。在 391 名参与者中,291 名在术后 6 个月时具有完整的随访信息。

结局测量

在等待名单登记时和术后 6 个月时,使用 11 点数字评分量表评估主要症状(背部或腿部疼痛更严重的一侧)的强度。疼痛评分高度偏态,因此分为由四分位数定义的四个有序水平。

方法

在主要分析中,从等待名单登记到手术的时间根据 12 周的临床有意义的预定切点进行二分。使用有序逻辑回归比较两组之间经历更高疼痛强度的可能性。通过倾向评分和常规多变量模型控制混杂因素。

结果

在未调整的分析中,与短等待时间患者相比,长等待时间患者在术后 6 个月时更有可能经历更高的疼痛强度;未调整的比例优势比(POR)=1.8(95%置信区间[CI],1.2-2.8)。在控制所有测量混杂因素的不平衡后,这种关联仍然存在,长等待时间患者报告疼痛更严重的可能性仍高出 70%;调整后的 POR=1.7(95% CI,1.0-2.8)。

结论

ESLD 等候名单登记后等待 12 周或以上与术后 6 个月时经历更严重疼痛的可能性适度相关。这一结果并不是由于测量混杂因素的差异所致。鼓励未来的研究确定其他尚未测量的变量,这些变量可能与 ESLD 患者的较长等待时间和较差结局相关。在那之前,在高度限制 ESLD 就诊机会的司法管辖区,手术的预期等待时间可能是对那些对手术治疗仍有未解决偏好的患者的一个有用的决策标准。

相似文献

1
The effect of waiting time on pain intensity after elective surgical lumbar discectomy.择期手术腰椎间盘切除术术后等待时间对疼痛强度的影响。
Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1736-48. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
2
The effect of compensation status on waiting time for elective surgical lumbar discectomy.代偿状态对择期手术腰椎间盘切除术等待时间的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2052-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b2f233.
3
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of anular repair in lumbar discectomy: two-year follow-up.前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照研究腰椎间盘切除术的环状修复:两年随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1161-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b2e2f.
4
Correlation of preoperative depression and somatic perception scales with postoperative disability and quality of life after lumbar discectomy.术前抑郁和躯体知觉量表与腰椎间盘切除术后残疾和生活质量的相关性。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Feb;14(2):261-7. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE10190. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
5
Multivariate prognostic modeling of persistent pain following lumbar discectomy.腰椎间盘切除术后持续性疼痛的多变量预后建模。
Pain Physician. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(5):421-34.
6
Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases.内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症:262例连续病例的前瞻性队列评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 20;33(9):973-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8ade.
7
Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.管状椎间盘切除术与传统显微椎间盘切除术治疗坐骨神经痛的随机对照试验
JAMA. 2009 Jul 8;302(2):149-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.972.
8
Oxiplex reduces leg pain, back pain, and associated symptoms after lumbar discectomy.Oxiplex 可减轻腰椎间盘切除术后的腿部疼痛、背部疼痛和相关症状。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 15;37(8):631-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182309af7.
9
Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study.腰椎间盘疾病手术后的再次手术率:全国队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):581-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318274f9a7.
10
Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon.腰椎间盘突出症患者接受大切口椎间盘切除术与小切口椎间盘切除术的手术效果比较:一项由同一位脊柱外科医生实施手术的前瞻性随机研究
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Jul;19(5):344-7. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211201.93125.1c.

引用本文的文献

1
The persistence of psychological distress while waiting for pain management.等待疼痛管理期间心理困扰的持续存在。
Br J Pain. 2025 Sep 12:20494637251377761. doi: 10.1177/20494637251377761.
2
Patients' experience on waiting for spinal arthrodesis: a qualitative study.患者等待脊柱融合术的体验:一项定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Mar;34(3):833-842. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03861-3. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
3
Comprehensive Analysis of Treatment Approaches for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review.腰椎间盘突出症治疗方法的综合分析:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):e67899. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67899. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Online health information-seeking behaviours for low back pain in the United Kingdom: analysis of data from Google trends and the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2004-2019.英国下背痛的在线健康信息搜索行为:对2004年至2019年谷歌趋势和全球疾病负担研究数据的分析
Int Health. 2025 Jan 3;17(1):71-76. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae020.
5
Predicting the Need for Surgery in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A New Internally Validated Scoring System.预测腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术需求:一种新的内部验证评分系统。
Asian Spine J. 2023 Dec;17(6):1059-1065. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0023. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Predictors of Recovery Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Sciatica: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.腰椎间盘显微切除术治疗坐骨神经痛后恢复的预测因素:一项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 May 29;15(5):e39664. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39664. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Cost consequence analysis of waiting for lumbar disc herniation surgery.等待腰椎间盘突出症手术的成本后果分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 18;13(1):4519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31029-5.
8
Risk Factors, Prevention, and Primary and Secondary Management of Sciatica: An Updated Overview.坐骨神经痛的危险因素、预防以及一级和二级管理:最新综述
Cureus. 2022 Nov 12;14(11):e31405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31405. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Waiting time for surgery influences the outcome in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus - a population-based study.手术等待时间影响特发性正常压力脑积水的结果 - 一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Feb;164(2):469-478. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05085-7. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
10
Early Versus Delayed Microdiscectomy for Chronic Sciatica Lasting 4-12 Months Secondary to Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.腰椎间盘突出继发慢性坐骨神经痛4至12个月的早期与延迟显微椎间盘切除术:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
Global Spine J. 2023 Sep;13(7):1856-1864. doi: 10.1177/21925682211054040. Epub 2021 Nov 3.