Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopedics Surgery, University of British Columbia, Blusson Spinal Cord Center, 6th Floor, 818 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, ON, Canada.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 18;13(1):4519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31029-5.
The economic repercussions of waiting for lumbar disc surgery have not been well studied. The primary goal of this study was to perform a cost-consequence analysis of patients receiving early vs late surgery for symptomatic disc herniation from a societal perspective. Secondarily, we compared patient factors and patient-reported outcomes. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the CSORN registry. A cost-consequence analysis was performed where direct and indirect costs were compared, and different outcomes were listed separately. Comparisons were made on an observational cohort of patients receiving surgery less than 60 days after consent (short wait) or 60 days or more after consent (long wait). This study included 493 patients with surgery between January 2015 and October 2021 with 272 patients (55.2%) in the short wait group and 221 patients (44.8%) classified as long wait. There was no difference in proportions of patients who returned to work at 3 and 12-months. Time from surgery to return to work was similar between both groups (34.0 vs 34.9 days, p = 0.804). Time from consent to return to work was longer in the longer wait group corresponding to an additional $11,753.10 mean indirect cost per patient. The short wait group showed increased healthcare usage at 3 months with more emergency department visits (52.6% vs 25.0%, p < 0.032), more physiotherapy (84.6% vs 72.0%, p < 0.001) and more MRI (65.2% vs 41.4%, p < 0.043). This corresponded to an additional direct cost of $518.21 per patient. Secondarily, the short wait group had higher baseline NRS leg, ODI, and lower EQ5D and PCS. The long wait group had more patients with symptoms over 2 years duration (57.6% vs 34.1%, p < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients reached MCID in terms of NRS leg pain at 3-month follow up in the short wait group (84.0% vs 75.9%, p < 0.040). This cost-consequence analysis of an observational cohort showed decreased costs associated with early surgery of $11,234.89 per patient when compared to late surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The early surgery group had more severe symptoms with higher healthcare utilization. This is counterbalanced by the additional productivity loss in the long wait group, which likely have a more chronic disease. From a societal economic perspective, early surgery seems beneficial and should be promoted.
等待腰椎间盘手术的经济影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究的主要目的是从社会角度对接受早期与晚期手术治疗症状性椎间盘突出症的患者进行成本-效果分析。其次,我们比较了患者因素和患者报告的结果。这是对 CSORN 登记处前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。进行了成本-效果分析,比较了直接成本和间接成本,并分别列出了不同的结果。比较了在同意后不到 60 天(短等待)或 60 天或更长时间(长等待)接受手术的患者观察队列。这项研究包括了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 10 月期间接受手术的 493 名患者,其中 272 名患者(55.2%)在短等待组,221 名患者(44.8%)被归类为长等待。两组在术后 3 个月和 12 个月恢复工作的患者比例没有差异。两组之间从手术到恢复工作的时间相似(34.0 天 vs 34.9 天,p=0.804)。在较长的等待时间组中,从同意到恢复工作的时间更长,每位患者的间接费用平均增加了 11753.10 加元。短等待组在 3 个月时的医疗保健使用率增加,急诊就诊(52.6% vs 25.0%,p<0.032)、物理治疗(84.6% vs 72.0%,p<0.001)和更多的 MRI(65.2% vs 41.4%,p<0.043)更多。这相当于每位患者额外增加了 518.21 加元的直接费用。其次,短等待组的基线 NRS 腿部、ODI 更高,EQ5D 和 PCS 更低。长等待组有更多的患者症状持续时间超过 2 年(57.6% vs 34.1%,p<0.001)。在短等待组中,有更多的患者在 3 个月的随访中达到了 NRS 腿部疼痛的 MCID(84.0% vs 75.9%,p<0.040)。这项对观察性队列的成本-效果分析表明,与晚期手术相比,早期手术可为每位患者节省 11234.89 加元的费用。早期手术组的症状更严重,医疗保健利用率更高。这与长等待组的额外生产力损失相平衡,长等待组可能患有更慢性疾病。从社会经济学的角度来看,早期手术似乎是有益的,应该得到推广。