Suppr超能文献

根治性前列腺切除术中的盆腔淋巴结清扫术是否会影响前列腺癌挽救性淋巴结切除术的淋巴结复发?

Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?

机构信息

Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Mar;59(2):83-90. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.2.83. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To verify the quality of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed at radical prostatectomy (RP) and its impact on nodal recurrence in patients undergoing salvage lymph node dissection (sLND).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 48 patients who underwent sLND for presumed nodal recurrence, to describe the PLND characteristics at RP and correlate the anatomical sites and number of suspicious nodes reported in radiological imaging and final pathology of sLND.

RESULTS

Overall, at RP, 8 (16.7%) did not undergo PLND, 32 (66.7%) and 8 (16.7%) received a "limited" (between external iliac vein and obturator nerve) and an "extended" (external iliac, hypogastric, and obturator) dissection, respectively. Median nodes removed during limited and extended dissection were 2 and 24, respectively. At sLND, the mean age was 61.3 years and median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 1.07 ng/mL. Median nodes removed at sLND were 17 with a median of 2 positive nodes. Recurrent nodes were identified within the template of an extended PLND in 62.5%, 50.0% and 12.5% patients, respectively, following prior no, limited and extended dissection at RP. Recurrence outside the expected lymphatic drainage pathway was noted in 37.5% patients with prior extended dissection at RP. There was a correlation between imaging and pathology specimen in 83% for node location and 58.3% for number of anatomical sites involved.

CONCLUSIONS

In prostate cancer patients undergoing sLND, most had inadequate PLND at the original RP. Pattern of nodal recurrence may be influenced by the prior dissection and pre sLND imaging appears to underestimate the nodal recurrence.

摘要

目的

验证根治性前列腺切除术(RP)时行盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)的质量及其对接受挽救性淋巴结清扫术(sLND)患者淋巴结复发的影响。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 48 例因疑似淋巴结复发而行 sLND 的患者,描述 RP 时 PLND 的特征,并将放射影像学和 sLND 最终病理报告中报告的可疑淋巴结的解剖部位和数量进行相关分析。

结果

总体而言,8 例(16.7%)患者在 RP 时未行 PLND,32 例(66.7%)和 8 例(16.7%)患者分别接受了“有限”(外髂静脉和闭孔神经之间)和“广泛”(外髂、腹下和闭孔)清扫。有限和广泛清扫时切除的淋巴结中位数分别为 2 和 24。在 sLND 时,平均年龄为 61.3 岁,中位前列腺特异抗原(PSA)为 1.07ng/ml。sLND 时切除的淋巴结中位数为 17 个,阳性淋巴结中位数为 2 个。在 RP 时先前无、有限和广泛清扫的患者中,分别有 62.5%、50.0%和 12.5%的患者在 sLND 时在预期的淋巴结引流途径内发现复发淋巴结。在 RP 时已行广泛清扫的患者中,37.5%的患者在预期的淋巴引流途径外发现淋巴结复发。影像学和病理标本在淋巴结位置上的相关性为 83%,在涉及的解剖部位数量上的相关性为 58.3%。

结论

在接受 sLND 的前列腺癌患者中,大多数患者在最初的 RP 时行 PLND 不充分。淋巴结复发模式可能受先前的清扫影响,且 sLND 前影像学检查似乎低估了淋巴结复发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e590/5840122/6ec538e5a04e/icu-59-83-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验