Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2013 Sep;65(3):223-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
Hominins that differ from Homo erectus, the Neanderthals, and recent humans are known from Middle Pleistocene localities across the Old World. The taxonomic status of these populations has been clouded by controversy. Perhaps the most critical problem has been an incomplete understanding of variation in skull form. Here, both H. erectus and later mid-Pleistocene hominins are the focus of an investigation aimed at clarifying the relationships among brain volume, basicranial dimensions, neurocranial shape, and certain facial characters. Brain size in H. erectus averages about 950 cm(3), while in a series of Middle Pleistocene crania from Africa and Europe, volume is about 1230 cm(3). If encephalization is the primary mechanism operating in the mid-Pleistocene, then diverse aspects of cranial form cannot all be treated as independent variables. Correlation is utilized to examine the associations among measurements for more than 30 H. erectus crania that are reasonably well preserved. A similar approach is used with the Middle Pleistocene sample. Patterns of covariation are compared in order to assess integration. Next, factor analysis is applied to the H. erectus specimens in an attempt to identify modules, tightly integrated traits that can evolve independently. Studies of the variation within H. erectus are followed by direct comparisons with the Middle Pleistocene population. Discriminant functions facilitate the description of intergroup differences. Traits that vary independently from brain volume include anterior frontal broadening, lateral expansion of the parietal vault, elevation of the lambda-inion chord, and rounding of the sagittal contour of the occipital. This finding helps to resolve the problem of species recognition. Neurocranial proportions as well as characters from the cranial base and face can be incorporated into a differential diagnosis for the mid-Pleistocene sample. Evidence presented here supports arguments for speciation in the Middle Pleistocene.
不同于直立人、尼安德特人和现代人的原始人类,从旧石器时代中期开始就在世界各地的遗址中被发现。这些人群的分类地位一直存在争议。也许最关键的问题是对颅骨形态变化的理解不够完整。在这里,直立人和后来的中更新世原始人类都是一个研究的焦点,旨在澄清脑容量、颅基尺寸、颅形和某些面骨特征之间的关系。直立人脑量平均约为 950 立方厘米,而在非洲和欧洲一系列中更新世颅骨中,体积约为 1230 立方厘米。如果脑化是中更新世的主要机制,那么颅形的各个方面都不能被视为独立变量。相关分析用于检验 30 多个保存较好的直立人头骨测量值之间的关联。类似的方法也用于中更新世样本。为了评估整合,比较了协变模式。接下来,对直立人标本进行因子分析,试图识别可以独立进化的紧密整合的模块。对直立人变异的研究之后,直接与中更新世种群进行了比较。判别函数有助于描述组间差异。与脑容量变化独立的特征包括额骨前部变宽、顶骨外侧扩张、后联合线抬高和枕骨矢状轮廓变圆。这一发现有助于解决物种识别问题。颅基和面部特征的神经颅比例可以纳入中更新世样本的鉴别诊断。这里提出的证据支持中更新世存在物种形成的论点。