Suppr超能文献

疼痛诱发意象与催眠易感性及格雷的行为抑制/激活系统的活动有关。

Pain-inducing imagery as a function of hypnotisability and of the activity of Gray's Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Systems.

机构信息

Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2013 Dec 17;557 Pt B:184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.06.049. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to test the efficacy of pain imagery as a function of hypnotisability and of the activity of Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Systems. Questionnaires of imagery abilities (Betts) for the visual, cutaneous and organic modalities, absorption in cognitive tasks (TAS), proneness to inhibit stressful/painful experience/seek out positive experiences (BIS BAS), trait anxiety (STAI-Y2) and psychological well-being (PWB) were administered to 21 subjects with high hypnotisability (highs) and 21 subjects with low hypnotisability (lows). Self-reports of pain intensity and of neutral tactile perception were collected during imagery of nociceptive (Pain) and neutral tactile stimulation (NT). ECG and skin conductance were recorded. Highs exhibited greater imagery abilities, absorption, Behavioral Inhibition System Activity and psychological well-being with respect to lows. They reported lower scores of pain intensity than of tactile perception, while in lows Pain and NT scores did not differ. However, controlling for BAS, but not for BIS, revealed differences in the efficacy of pain imagery between highs and lows. Heart rate decreased in both tasks and groups; heart rate variability and skin conductance did not change significantly during imageries. Our findings suggest that the Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Systems interact with imagery abilities reducing the efficacy of pain imagery and prompt investigation of possible similar interactions in the modulation of physically induced experimental pain and of chronic pain in the general population.

摘要

本研究旨在测试疼痛意象作为催眠能力和行为抑制/激活系统活动的功能的疗效。向 21 名高催眠能力(高组)和 21 名低催眠能力(低组)受试者发放了视觉、皮肤和有机感觉三种感觉模态的意象能力问卷(贝茨问卷)、认知任务中的吸收能力问卷(TAS)、抑制压力/疼痛/寻求积极体验的倾向问卷(BIS/BAS)、特质焦虑问卷(STAI-Y2)和心理幸福感问卷(PWB)。在进行疼痛(疼痛)和中性触觉刺激(NT)的意象时,记录了受试者自我报告的疼痛强度和中性触觉感知。记录了心电图和皮肤电导。与低组相比,高组表现出更强的意象能力、吸收能力、行为抑制系统活动和心理幸福感。他们报告的疼痛强度得分低于触觉感知得分,而在低组中,疼痛和 NT 得分没有差异。然而,控制 BAS 而非 BIS 后,发现高组和低组在疼痛意象的疗效上存在差异。两种任务和两组的心率均降低;在进行意象时,心率变异性和皮肤电导率没有显著变化。我们的发现表明,行为抑制/激活系统与意象能力相互作用,降低了疼痛意象的疗效,并促使对可能在调节物理诱导的实验性疼痛和一般人群中的慢性疼痛中存在的类似相互作用进行进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验