Fuchs Lynn S, Geary David C, Compton Donald L, Fuchs Douglas, Schatschneider Christopher, Hamlett Carol L, Deselms Jacqueline, Seethaler Pamela M, Wilson Julie, Craddock Caitlin F, Bryant Joan D, Luther Kurstin, Changas Paul
Department of Special Education, Vanderbilt University.
J Educ Psychol. 2013 Jan 1;105(1):58-77. doi: 10.1037/a0030127.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 1st-grade number knowledge tutoring with contrasting forms of practice. Tutoring occurred 3 times per week for 16 weeks. In each 30-min session, the major emphasis (25 min) was number knowledge; the other 5 min provided practice in 1 of 2 forms. Nonspeeded practice reinforced relations and principles addressed in number knowledge tutoring. Speeded practice promoted quick responding and use of efficient counting procedures to generate many correct responses. At-risk students were randomly assigned to number knowledge tutoring with speeded practice ( = 195), number knowledge tutoring with nonspeeded practice ( = 190), and control (no tutoring, = 206). Each tutoring condition produced stronger learning than control on all 4 mathematics outcomes. Speeded practice produced stronger learning than nonspeeded practice on arithmetic and 2-digit calculations, but effects were comparable on number knowledge and word problems. Effects of both practice conditions on arithmetic were partially mediated by increased reliance on retrieval, but only speeded practice helped at-risk children compensate for weak reasoning ability.
本研究的目的是调查采用对比练习形式进行一年级数字知识辅导的效果。辅导每周进行3次,共16周。在每次30分钟的课程中,主要重点(25分钟)是数字知识;另外5分钟以两种形式之一进行练习。非加速练习强化了数字知识辅导中涉及的关系和原则。加速练习促进快速反应,并使用高效的计数程序来产生许多正确答案。风险学生被随机分配到接受加速练习的数字知识辅导组(n = 195)、接受非加速练习的数字知识辅导组(n = 190)和对照组(无辅导,n = 206)。在所有4项数学成绩上,每种辅导条件都比对照组产生了更强的学习效果。在算术和两位数计算方面,加速练习比非加速练习产生了更强的学习效果,但在数字知识和文字问题上效果相当。两种练习条件对算术的影响部分是通过增加对检索的依赖来介导的,但只有加速练习帮助风险儿童弥补了较弱的推理能力。