Suppr超能文献

儿科患者肠外营养外周给药的最大耐受渗透压

Maximum tolerated osmolarity for peripheral administration of parenteral nutrition in pediatric patients.

作者信息

Dugan Shannon, Le Jennifer, Jew Rita K

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California

UCSD Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, La Jolla, California.

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 Sep;38(7):847-51. doi: 10.1177/0148607113495569. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data support a recommended maximum osmolarity for administration of peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN). In this retrospective, matched-cohort study, we evaluated the incidence of phlebitis or infiltration associated with administration of PPN with an osmolarity >1000 mOsm/L vs ≤1000 mOsm/L.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients ≤18 years old who received PPN in a 2-year period were included in the study. Data related to patient demographics, PPN constituents, and adverse effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients met entry criteria. Overall, 139 (40%) patients experienced phlebitis or infiltration. There were no differences between patients who did or did not develop adverse events in terms of age or weight. Administration of PPN with osmolarity >1000 mOsm/L vs ≤1000 mOsm/L significantly increased infiltration (17% vs 7%; odds ratio [OR, 2.47]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-4.94; P = .01) and the combined composite end point of phlebitis or infiltration (45% vs 34%; OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.07-2.54; P = .02). In multivariate analysis, osmolarity >1000 mOsm/L vs ≤1000 mOsm/L was an independent risk factor for developing complications (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-2.52; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Two of every 5 children experienced phlebitis or infiltration during administration of PPN. These adverse effects were more often observed in those who received PPN with osmolarity >1000 mOsm/L vs ≤1000 mOsm/L. With this high incidence of adverse effects, we recommend that if PPN is used, the osmolarity should not exceed 1000 mOsm/L. More important, PPN should only be used temporarily until central access is obtained.

摘要

背景

仅有有限的数据支持外周肠外营养(PPN)输注时推荐的最大渗透压。在这项回顾性匹配队列研究中,我们评估了渗透压>1000mOsm/L与≤1000mOsm/L的PPN输注相关的静脉炎或渗漏的发生率。

材料与方法

纳入在2年期间接受PPN的18岁及以下患者。分析与患者人口统计学、PPN成分和不良反应相关的数据。

结果

共有352例患者符合纳入标准。总体而言,139例(40%)患者发生了静脉炎或渗漏。发生或未发生不良事件的患者在年龄或体重方面无差异。与渗透压≤1000mOsm/L的PPN相比,渗透压>1000mOsm/L的PPN输注显著增加了渗漏发生率(17%对7%;优势比[OR,2.47];95%置信区间[CI],1.24 - 4.94;P = 0.01)以及静脉炎或渗漏的综合复合终点发生率(45%对34%;OR,1.65;95%CI,1.07 - 2.54;P = 0.02)。在多变量分析中,与渗透压≤1000mOsm/L相比,渗透压>1000mOsm/L是发生并发症的独立危险因素(OR,1.67;95%CI,1.08 - 2.52;P = 0.02)。

结论

每5名儿童中有2名在PPN输注期间发生静脉炎或渗漏。这些不良反应在接受渗透压>1000mOsm/L而非≤1000mOsm/L的PPN的患者中更常观察到。鉴于不良反应的高发生率,我们建议如果使用PPN,渗透压不应超过1000mOsm/L。更重要的是,PPN仅应在获得中心静脉通路之前临时使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验