Department of Pharmacology Pain, Global Biomedical Sciences, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Eur J Pain. 2014 Feb;18(2):213-22. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00359.x. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
Burrowing is an evolutionarily conserved behaviour in rodents. This study validates a refined burrowing paradigm (requiring a reduced number of animals) in a rat model of sub-chronic knee joint inflammation and evaluates its sensitivity and specificity for analgesic drugs.
Knee joint inflammation in rats was induced by intra-articular injection with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). Burrowing performance was assessed at baseline without study drugs, and in CFA-naive and CFA-injected animals following administration of the analgesic drugs naproxen, pregabalin and morphine, each at three doses, or corresponding vehicle (nine rats per dose group). The specificity of the model was evaluated by also testing the anxiogenic drug yohimbine, the stimulant drug dexamphetamine and the anxiolytic drug chlordiazepoxide in CFA-naive and CFA-injected animals. Percentage maximum possible effect (%MPE) was determined by relating the difference between post-CFA and baseline burrowing performance in each drug dose group to that in the vehicle group in each experiment.
Burrowing performance in the vehicle groups was decreased by 39.0-59.8% in CFA-injected animals compared with CFA-naive animals. CFA-induced reductions in burrowing performance were reversed by each of the three analgesic drugs tested. The highest %MPE was 75.2% with naproxen 50 mg/kg, 80.9% with pregabalin 10 mg/kg and 77.0% with morphine 1 mg/kg (all p < 0.05 vs. control). CFA-induced reductions in burrowing performance were not reversed by yohimbine, dexamphetamine or chlordiazepoxide.
This study provides pharmacological validation of a refined burrowing paradigm for analgesic efficacy that exhibits good predictive validity, with high sensitivity and specificity.
打洞是啮齿动物中一种进化保守的行为。本研究在慢性膝关节炎症的大鼠模型中验证了一种改良的打洞范式(需要较少的动物),并评估了其对镇痛药物的敏感性和特异性。
通过关节内注射完全弗氏佐剂(CFA)在大鼠中诱导膝关节炎症。在没有研究药物的情况下,在基线时评估打洞性能,在给予三种剂量的镇痛药物(萘普生、普瑞巴林和吗啡)或相应的载体(每组 9 只大鼠)后,在 CFA 未处理和 CFA 注射的动物中评估打洞性能。通过在 CFA 未处理和 CFA 注射的动物中测试焦虑药物育亨宾、兴奋剂右苯丙胺和抗焦虑药物地西泮,评估该模型的特异性。通过将每个实验中每个药物剂量组中 CFA 后与基线相比的打洞性能的差异与载体组中的差异进行比较,确定最大可能效应的百分比(%MPE)。
与 CFA 未处理的动物相比,载体组中 CFA 注射的动物的打洞性能降低了 39.0-59.8%。三种测试的镇痛药物均逆转了 CFA 诱导的打洞性能下降。萘普生 50mg/kg 的最高 %MPE 为 75.2%,普瑞巴林 10mg/kg 为 80.9%,吗啡 1mg/kg 为 77.0%(均 p<0.05 与对照相比)。育亨宾、右苯丙胺或地西泮未逆转 CFA 诱导的打洞性能下降。
本研究为具有良好预测有效性的镇痛疗效改良打洞范式提供了药理学验证,具有高敏感性和特异性。