• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简要交流:比较四种 HBsAg ELISA 试剂盒的诊断性能。

Brief communication: comparison the diagnostic performance of four HBsAg ELISA kits.

机构信息

Department of Clinical laboratory, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei, China.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2013 Jul;27(4):294-6. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21600.

DOI:10.1002/jcla.21600
PMID:23852787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6807336/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparison of diagnostic efficiency of four ELISA kits for determining HBsAg.

METHODS

Collecting 348 serum samples from clinical laboratory of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University without specific gender and age requirements, determining HBsAg by the four ELISA kits, simultaneously. Confirmatory test was carried out when the initial results are positive.

RESULTS

329 out of 348 samples results were consistent (94.5%), 152 out of 329 were positive, and 177 out of 329 were negative, and all the positive results can be confirmed; 19 samples were not consistent (5.5%), and only 1 sample was confirmed by the confirmatory test. After calculation, the diagnostic efficiencies of the four ELISA kits (Beijing Wantai, Xiamen Xinchuang, Zhuhai Lizhu, and Shanghai Kehua) were 98.6%, 98.0%, 99.7%, and 97.4%, respectively, the sensitivities were 100%, 99.4%, 99.4%, and 100%, respectively, the specificities were 97.5%, 96.9%, 100%, and 95.4%, respectively, the false positive rates were 2.5%, 3.1%, 0, and 4.6%, respectively, and the false negative rates were 0, 0.6%, 0.6%, and 0, respectively. All the initial absorbencies of the false positive samples were less than 1.0.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic efficiency of Lizhu is the highest, while Kehua is the lowest. False positive or false negative results would take place in any of the kits, an HBsAg confirmatory test is essential for initially positive samples, especially with absorbance <1.0, because it can exclude most false positives.

摘要

背景

比较四种 ELISA 试剂盒检测 HBsAg 的诊断效率。

方法

收集武汉大学人民医院临床实验室无特定性别和年龄要求的 348 份血清样本,同时使用这四种 ELISA 试剂盒检测 HBsAg。对初筛阳性的样本进行确证试验。

结果

348 份样本中有 329 份(94.5%)结果一致,329 份中 152 份为阳性,177 份为阴性,且所有阳性结果均可被确证;19 份结果不一致(5.5%),仅 1 份样本经确证试验确证。经计算,四种 ELISA 试剂盒(北京万泰、厦门新创、珠海丽珠和上海科华)的诊断效率分别为 98.6%、98.0%、99.7%和 97.4%,灵敏度分别为 100%、99.4%、99.4%和 100%,特异性分别为 97.5%、96.9%、100%和 95.4%,假阳性率分别为 2.5%、3.1%、0 和 4.6%,假阴性率分别为 0、0.6%、0.6%和 0。所有假阳性样本的初筛吸光度均小于 1.0。

结论

丽珠的诊断效率最高,科华最低。任何试剂盒均可能出现假阳性或假阴性结果,对于初筛阳性的样本,尤其是吸光度<1.0 的样本,进行 HBsAg 确证试验非常必要,因为它可以排除大多数假阳性。

相似文献

1
Brief communication: comparison the diagnostic performance of four HBsAg ELISA kits.简要交流:比较四种 HBsAg ELISA 试剂盒的诊断性能。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2013 Jul;27(4):294-6. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21600.
2
Analytical performance of three diagnostic reagents for HBsAg on an automatic ELISA analyzer.三种乙肝表面抗原诊断试剂在自动酶联免疫吸附测定分析仪上的分析性能
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22159. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
[Comparison of homemade and imported HbsAg ELISA kits on screening blood samples].[国产与进口乙肝表面抗原酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒筛查血样的比较]
Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jun;20(2):84-6.
4
Clinical trial and performance evaluation of the Wantai HBsAg (CMIA) diagnostic kit for screening blood donors in China.在中国进行的用于献血者筛查的万泰 HBsAg(CMIA)诊断试剂盒的临床试验和性能评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2;14(1):1891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51910-1.
5
[Establishment of confirmatory test for suspicious hepatitis B surface antigen positive samples].[可疑乙型肝炎表面抗原阳性样本确证试验的建立]
Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;26(4):310-2.
6
Development of an economic and efficient strategy to detect HBsAg: application of "gray-zones" in ELISA and combined use of several detection assays.开发经济高效的 HBsAg 检测策略:ELISA 中的“灰区”应用及多种检测方法联合使用。
Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Nov 20;412(23-24):2046-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.01.020. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
7
False-positive hepatitis B surface antigen screening test results in patients receiving granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor.接受粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗的患者中出现乙肝表面抗原筛查试验假阳性结果。
Transfusion. 1996 Nov-Dec;36(11-12):948-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36111297091735.x.
8
[Sensitivity and specificity of 4 domestic ELISA kits for detection of hepatitis B virus markers].[4种国产酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒检测乙型肝炎病毒标志物的敏感性和特异性]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Sep;29(9):915-8.
9
Performance Evaluation of Different Commercial Serological Kits for Diagnosis of Acute Hepatitis E Viral Infection.不同商业血清学试剂盒在急性戊型肝炎病毒感染诊断中的性能评估。
Pol J Microbiol. 2020 Sep;69(2):217-222. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2020-025. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
10
Negative interference in serum HBsAg ELISA from rheumatoid factors.类风湿因子对血清乙肝表面抗原酶联免疫吸附测定的负干扰。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):e80620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080620. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Viral Biomarkers in Chronic HBeAg Negative HBV Infection.慢性HBeAg阴性HBV感染中的病毒生物标志物
Genes (Basel). 2018 Sep 27;9(10):469. doi: 10.3390/genes9100469.
2
Analytical performance of three diagnostic reagents for HBsAg on an automatic ELISA analyzer.三种乙肝表面抗原诊断试剂在自动酶联免疫吸附测定分析仪上的分析性能
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22159. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
Preliminary Assessment of Various Additives on the Specific Reactivity of Anti- rHBsAg Monoclonal Antibodies.多种添加剂对抗重组乙肝表面抗原单克隆抗体特异性反应性的初步评估
Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2015 Oct-Dec;7(4):145-50.
4
Microfluidic biosensing systems using magnetic nanoparticles.基于磁性纳米粒子的微流控生物传感系统。
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Sep 9;14(9):18535-56. doi: 10.3390/ijms140918535.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and virological significance of the co-existence of HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies in hepatitis B chronic carriers.乙肝慢性携带者中HBsAg与抗-HBs抗体共存的临床及病毒学意义。
Virology. 2007 Oct 10;367(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
2
Comparison of the results for three automated immunoassay systems in determining serum HBV markers.三种自动化免疫分析系统检测血清乙肝病毒标志物结果的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2006 Oct;372(1-2):129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.03.032. Epub 2006 May 19.
3
Evaluation of two chemiluminescent immunoassays of ADVIA Centaur for hepatitis B serology markers.ADVIA Centaur两款化学发光免疫分析法检测乙型肝炎血清学标志物的评估
Clin Chim Acta. 2005 May;355(1-2):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.11.031.
4
Clinical practice: prevention of hepatitis B with the hepatitis B vaccine.临床实践:乙肝疫苗预防乙型肝炎
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2832-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp041507.
5
Hepatitis B virus infection--natural history and clinical consequences.乙型肝炎病毒感染——自然史与临床后果
N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 11;350(11):1118-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra031087.
6
Hepatitis B surface antigen: decreased need for confirmation of reactive results.乙肝表面抗原:反应性结果确认需求降低。
Clin Chem. 2000 Apr;46(4):582.
7
[Serum biological markers and screening of viral hepatitis].[血清生物学标志物与病毒性肝炎的筛查]
Rev Prat. 1995 Jan 15;45(2):168-73.
8
Acute hepatitis B virus infection: relation of age to the clinical expression of disease and subsequent development of the carrier state.急性乙型肝炎病毒感染:年龄与疾病临床表现及随后携带者状态发展的关系。
J Infect Dis. 1985 Apr;151(4):599-603. doi: 10.1093/infdis/151.4.599.