• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕期集中小组护理对母乳喂养结局的影响。

Effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on breastfeeding outcomes.

机构信息

Peabody Research Institute, Vanderbilt University, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):389-95. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12008. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1111/jmwh.12008
PMID:23855366
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on breastfeeding outcomes, relative to traditional prenatal care delivered in an individual format.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental research design was conducted with 794 women receiving prenatal care delivered in a group or individual format at 4 sites in Tennessee. Propensity scores were used to create groups of women statistically matched on background demographics and medical history. Outcomes included breastfeeding at discharge and breastfeeding at postpartum follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared with the matched comparison group of women receiving prenatal care in an individual format, women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care had significantly higher odds of any breastfeeding at discharge (odds ratio [OR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-3.26; P < .001). Across the 4 sites, there were no consistent differences in the odds of any breastfeeding at follow-up or exclusive breastfeeding at discharge or postpartum follow-up.

DISCUSSION

CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care may have beneficial effects on initial rates of breastfeeding relative to individually delivered care. However, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care has robust effects on exclusive breastfeeding at discharge or postpartum follow-up.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在考察与传统个体形式的产前护理相比,集中妊娠小组产前护理对母乳喂养结果的影响。

方法

在田纳西州的 4 个地点,采用准实验研究设计,对接受小组或个体形式产前护理的 794 名妇女进行了研究。使用倾向评分对具有背景人口统计学和病史的妇女进行了统计学匹配的分组。结果包括分娩时的母乳喂养和产后随访时的母乳喂养。

结果

与接受个体形式产前护理的匹配对照组相比,集中妊娠小组产前护理的妇女在分娩时任何母乳喂养的可能性显著更高(优势比[OR],2.08;95%置信区间[CI],1.32-3.26;P<.001)。在 4 个地点,在产后随访时任何母乳喂养或完全母乳喂养的可能性均无一致差异。

讨论

集中妊娠小组产前护理可能对初始母乳喂养率具有有益影响,与个体提供的护理相比。然而,没有足够的证据得出结论,集中妊娠小组产前护理对产后随访时的完全母乳喂养有明显的影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on breastfeeding outcomes.孕期集中小组护理对母乳喂养结局的影响。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):389-95. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12008. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
2
Outcomes of Latina women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care.拉美裔女性在集中妊娠组产前护理中的结局与个体产前护理的比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12000. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
3
Examining Delivery Method and Infant Feeding Intentions between Women in Traditional and Non-Traditional Prenatal Care.研究传统和非传统产前护理模式下女性的分娩方式及婴儿喂养意向。
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Feb;22(2):274-282. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2400-2.
4
Promoting improved social support and quality of life with the CenteringPregnancy group model of prenatal care.通过围产期护理的集中怀孕小组模式促进社会支持和生活质量的改善。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Feb;20(1):209-220. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0698-1. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
5
Postpartum Contraceptive Use and Other Reproductive Health Outcomes Among CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care Participants.产后避孕措施的使用及其他生殖健康结局在“围孕期中心”参与产前保健的孕妇中的表现。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Jul;30(7):990-996. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8241. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
6
The Effect of Centering Pregnancy versus Traditional Prenatal Care Models on Improved Adolescent Health Behaviors in the Perinatal Period.以孕妇为中心的护理模式与传统产前护理模式对改善围产期青少年健康行为的影响。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Oct;28(5):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
7
The effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on gestational age, birth weight, and fetal demise.孕期集中护理对孕周、出生体重和胎儿死亡的影响。
Matern Child Health J. 2014 May;18(4):801-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1304-z.
8
A randomized controlled trial of knowledge sharing practice with empowerment strategies in pregnant women to improve exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months postpartum.一项关于在孕妇中采用赋权策略进行知识共享实践以改善产后头六个月纯母乳喂养情况的随机对照试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Sep;93(9):1009-18.
9
Effectiveness of a prenatal education programme on breastfeeding outcomes in Taiwan.台湾一项产前教育计划对母乳喂养结果的有效性。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):296-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01927.x. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
10
Efficacy of breastfeeding support provided by trained clinicians during an early, routine, preventive visit: a prospective, randomized, open trial of 226 mother-infant pairs.在早期、常规、预防性访视期间,由经过培训的临床医生提供的母乳喂养支持的效果:一项针对226对母婴的前瞻性、随机、开放试验。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e139-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1362.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of CenteringPregnancy: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation.“以孕妇为中心”项目的效果:一项准实验评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 3;13(9):1052. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091052.
2
Applying authoritative knowledge to better understand preparation for breastfeeding.运用权威知识以更好地理解母乳喂养准备。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Mar 31;6:1540376. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1540376. eCollection 2025.
3
Rural maternal health interventions: A scoping review and implications for best practices.农村孕产妇保健干预措施:一项范围综述及对最佳实践的启示
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e70007. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70007.
4
Effect of Group Antenatal Care on Breastfeeding Knowledge and Practices Among Pregnant Women in Ghana: Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.群组产前护理对加纳孕妇母乳喂养知识及实践的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 28;21(12):1587. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121587.
5
The impact of group antenatal care on newborns: Results of a cluster randomized control trial in Eastern Region, Ghana.群组产前护理对新生儿的影响:加纳东部地区一项群组随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05225-9.
6
Group vs Individual Prenatal Care and Gestational Diabetes Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.群组与个体产前护理和妊娠糖尿病结局:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330763. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30763.
7
Contributions of CenteringPregnancy to women's health behaviours, health literacy, and health care use in the Netherlands.“以孕妇为中心”项目对荷兰女性健康行为、健康素养及医疗保健利用情况的贡献。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 May 24;35:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102244. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Impact of Group vs. Individual Prenatal Care Provision on Women's Knowledge of Pregnancy-Related Topics: An Open, Controlled, Semi-Randomized Community Trial.小组式与个体化产前护理对女性妊娠相关知识的影响:一项开放性、对照、半随机社区试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 26;11(17):5015. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175015.
9
Group Prenatal Care Attendance and Women's Characteristics Associated with Low Attendance: Results from Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE Study).小组产前保健参与度及与低参与度相关的妇女特征:来自以妇女为中心和种族差异(CRADLE 研究)的结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1371-1381. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02784-7.
10
What Obstetrician-Gynecologists Should Know About Population Health.妇产科医生应该了解的人口健康知识。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1145-1152. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002638.