• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小组式与个体化产前护理对女性妊娠相关知识的影响:一项开放性、对照、半随机社区试验

Impact of Group vs. Individual Prenatal Care Provision on Women's Knowledge of Pregnancy-Related Topics: An Open, Controlled, Semi-Randomized Community Trial.

作者信息

Ratzon Ronit, Cohen Arnon, Hadar Amnon, Froimovici Miron, Bilenko Natalya

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel.

Department of Quality Measurements (Director), Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv 6209813, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 26;11(17):5015. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175015.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11175015
PMID:36078944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9457062/
Abstract

The importance of acquiring knowledge of pregnant women on prenatal care lies in its leading to confidence and ability in decision-making. There is a growing need for a model of prenatal care that will allow nurses to provide the most efficient pregnancy-related guidance with minimum need for additional staff. This study compares the level of knowledge on subjects pertaining to pregnancy and birth in low-risk pregnancies when delivered in group versus individual settings. The study is an open, controlled, semi-randomized community trial. The intervention arm received prenatal care services in a group setting led by a nurse. The control arm received prenatal care services in routine individual meetings with a nurse. Knowledge of prenatal subjects was evaluated by questionnaires. The level of knowledge of the women in the group setting for the pre-service questionnaire was lower than that of the women in the individual group, but higher for the final questionnaire. After accounting for a starting point difference (the women in the individual care arm started with a higher knowledge score), the women in the group setting had a three-fold improvement in score compared to the women in the individual setting ( = 0.043). Prenatal care provided in a group setting may lead to better knowledge acquisition, leading to better awareness of pregnancy-related medical conditions and to enhanced adherence to recommended pregnancy tests and healthy lifestyle.

摘要

让孕妇了解产前护理知识的重要性在于它能带来决策的信心和能力。越来越需要一种产前护理模式,使护士能够以最少的额外人员需求提供最有效的与怀孕相关的指导。本研究比较了低风险妊娠在集体环境与个体环境中分娩时,孕妇对与怀孕和分娩相关主题的知识水平。该研究是一项开放、对照、半随机的社区试验。干预组在由一名护士带领的集体环境中接受产前护理服务。对照组在与护士的常规个体会面中接受产前护理服务。通过问卷调查评估产前主题的知识。集体环境中女性在服务前问卷的知识水平低于个体组中的女性,但在最终问卷中更高。在考虑起始点差异(个体护理组中的女性起始知识得分更高)后,集体环境中的女性得分相比个体环境中的女性提高了三倍(P = 0.043)。在集体环境中提供的产前护理可能会带来更好的知识获取,从而提高对与怀孕相关医疗状况的认识,并增强对推荐的妊娠检查和健康生活方式的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5458/9457062/66f249c15ab2/jcm-11-05015-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5458/9457062/66f249c15ab2/jcm-11-05015-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5458/9457062/66f249c15ab2/jcm-11-05015-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Group vs. Individual Prenatal Care Provision on Women's Knowledge of Pregnancy-Related Topics: An Open, Controlled, Semi-Randomized Community Trial.小组式与个体化产前护理对女性妊娠相关知识的影响:一项开放性、对照、半随机社区试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 26;11(17):5015. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175015.
2
Evaluation of a midwifery initiated oral health-dental service program to improve oral health and birth outcomes for pregnant women: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial.评价助产士主导的口腔健康-牙科服务方案对改善孕妇口腔健康和分娩结局的效果:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jun;82:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring.随机比较强化远程监测的简化产前护理模式。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):638.e1-638.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.034. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
Using reproductive life plan-based information in a primary health care center increased Iranian women's knowledge of fertility, but not their future fertility plan: A randomized, controlled trial.在初级卫生保健中心使用基于生殖生活计划的信息可提高伊朗女性的生育知识,但不会改变她们未来的生育计划:一项随机对照试验。
Midwifery. 2018 Dec;67:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
The WHO antenatal care randomised controlled trial: rationale and study design.世界卫生组织产前护理随机对照试验:原理与研究设计。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 2:27-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00006.x.
6
Who should provide routine antenatal care for low-risk women, and how often? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group.低风险孕妇应由谁提供常规产前护理,以及护理频率应为多少?一项随机对照试验的系统评价。世界卫生组织产前护理试验研究组
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 2:7-26. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.12.s2.6.x.
7
Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: a randomized, controlled trial.辅助专业人员和护士进行家访:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2002 Sep;110(3):486-96. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.486.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Integrating a Nurse-Midwife-Led Oral Health Intervention Into CenteringPregnancy Prenatal Care: Results of a Pilot Study.将由助产士主导的口腔健康干预措施纳入集中孕期产前护理:一项试点研究的结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jul;62(4):463-469. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12613. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
Web-Based Training for Nurses on Using a Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision-making About Prenatal Screening: Parallel Controlled Trial.基于网络的护士使用决策辅助工具支持产前筛查共同决策培训:平行对照试验
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Jan 25;5(1):e31380. doi: 10.2196/31380.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of parity on gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women: a retrospective cohort study.产次对中国女性妊娠期糖尿病的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07620-1.
2
Enhancing Prenatal Group Medical Visits with Mindfulness Skills: A Pragmatic Trial with Latina and BIPOC Pregnant Women Experiencing Multiple Forms of Structural Inequity.运用正念技巧加强产前集体医疗就诊:一项针对经历多种形式结构性不平等的拉丁裔和有色人种孕妇的务实试验。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2024 Dec;15(12):2975-2994. doi: 10.1007/s12671-023-02227-z. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision-making autonomy in maternal health service use and associated factors among women in Mettu District, Southwest Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study.在埃塞俄比亚西南部梅图地区,产妇保健服务使用中的决策自主权及其相关因素:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 2;12(5):e059307. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059307.
2
Group Prenatal Care and Emergency Room Utilization.团体产前保健与急诊室利用率
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Oct;79(5):687-700. doi: 10.1177/10775587211059938. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
Intensive Approaches to Prenatal Care May Reduce Risk of Gestational Diabetes.
强化产前护理可能降低妊娠期糖尿病风险。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 May;30(5):713-721. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8464. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
4
Effects of a Multi-site Expansion of Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes.多地点扩展小组产前护理对分娩结果的影响。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1424-1433. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02795-4.
5
Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.群组产前护理与传统产前护理的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):551-61. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001560.
6
Gestational Weight Gain and Breastfeeding Outcomes in Group Prenatal Care.群组产前护理中的孕期体重增加与母乳喂养结果
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Sep;61(5):557-562. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12484. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
7
Qualitative Comparison of Women's Perspectives on the Functions and Benefits of Group and Individual Prenatal Care.女性对团体和个体产前护理的功能及益处看法的定性比较
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):224-34. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12379. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
8
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Prenatal Care: Perinatal Outcomes Among Adolescents in New York City Health Centers.群组产前护理的整群随机对照试验:纽约市健康中心青少年的围产期结局
Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):359-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302960. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
9
Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.针对女性的群组式与传统产前护理对比研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;2015(2):CD007622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3.
10
Group prenatal care: review of outcomes and recommendations for model implementation.群组产前护理:结局回顾与模型实施建议
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014 Jan;69(1):46-55. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000025.