• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学家追踪热门话题吗?

Do scientists trace hot topics?

机构信息

School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P R China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2013;3:2207. doi: 10.1038/srep02207.

DOI:10.1038/srep02207
PMID:23856680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3712320/
Abstract

Do scientists follow hot topics in their scientific investigations? In this paper, by performing analysis to papers published in the American Physical Society (APS) Physical Review journals, it is found that papers are more likely to be attracted by hot fields, where the hotness of a field is measured by the number of papers belonging to the field. This indicates that scientists generally do follow hot topics. However, there are qualitative differences among scientists from various countries, among research works regarding different number of authors, different number of affiliations and different number of references. These observations could be valuable for policy makers when deciding research funding and also for individual researchers when searching for scientific projects.

摘要

科学家在科学研究中是否会追随热门话题?在本文中,通过对美国物理学会(APS)物理评论期刊上发表的论文进行分析,发现论文更有可能被热门领域所吸引,而一个领域的热度则可以通过该领域的论文数量来衡量。这表明科学家通常确实会追随热门话题。然而,来自不同国家的科学家之间存在着质的差异,具体表现在研究工作的作者数量、机构数量和参考文献数量等方面。这些观察结果对于决策者在决定研究资金时以及对于个体研究人员在寻找科学项目时可能具有重要价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/2eea3d654e87/srep02207-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/7c2a1e70300a/srep02207-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/442997dfcf34/srep02207-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/5e6733b3838f/srep02207-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/2eea3d654e87/srep02207-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/7c2a1e70300a/srep02207-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/442997dfcf34/srep02207-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/5e6733b3838f/srep02207-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db76/3712320/2eea3d654e87/srep02207-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Do scientists trace hot topics?科学家追踪热门话题吗?
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2207. doi: 10.1038/srep02207.
2
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.期刊中热门话题的影响因素及预测
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Scientific output quality of 40 globally top-ranked medical researchers in the field of osteoporosis.骨质疏松症领域全球排名前 40 位的医学研究人员的科研产出质量。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 26;13(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0446-4.
4
The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers.PageRank指数:超越引用次数来量化研究人员的科学影响力
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134794. eCollection 2015.
5
Mapping Research Trends of Universal Health Coverage From 1990 to 2019: Bibliometric Analysis.绘制 1990 年至 2019 年全民健康覆盖研究趋势图:文献计量分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 11;7(1):e24569. doi: 10.2196/24569.
6
How are academic age, productivity and collaboration related to citing behavior of researchers?学术年龄、生产力和合作与研究人员的引用行为有何关系?
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049176. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
7
Representation of less-developed countries in Pharmacology journals: an online survey of corresponding authors.发展中国家在药理学期刊中的代表性:对应作者的在线调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 May 5;11:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-60.
8
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
9
The scientific literature in diagnostic radiology for American readers: a survey and analysis of journals, papers, and authors.面向美国读者的诊断放射学科学文献:期刊、论文及作者的调查与分析
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Nov;147(5):1055-61. doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.5.1055.
10
Pathways to research impact in primary healthcare: What do Australian primary healthcare researchers believe works best to facilitate the use of their research findings?初级卫生保健领域研究影响力的实现途径:澳大利亚初级卫生保健研究人员认为何种方式最有助于促进其研究成果的应用?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 2;15(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0179-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Musicians and researchers: two creative professions striving to improve heart health through music.音乐家与研究人员:两个致力于通过音乐改善心脏健康的创造性职业。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 10;11:1536829. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1536829. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimating the size of fields in biomedical sciences.估算生物医学科学领域的规模。
mSystems. 2024 Jan 23;9(1):e0065223. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00652-23. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3
Quantifying progress in research topics across nations.量化各国研究主题的进展。

本文引用的文献

1
Collaborations: The rise of research networks.合作:研究网络的兴起。
Nature. 2012 Oct 18;490(7420):335-6. doi: 10.1038/490335a.
2
Asymmetric disassembly and robustness in declining networks.衰退网络中的不对称拆解与稳健性
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 28;105(43):16466-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804740105. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
3
Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science.多所大学联合研究团队:科学领域中影响力、地域及分层的转变
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 23;13(1):4759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31452-8.
4
Characterizing and modeling the dynamics of activity and popularity.刻画并模拟活动及人气的动态变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089192. eCollection 2014.
Science. 2008 Nov 21;322(5905):1259-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1158357. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
4
Evolution of weighted scale-free networks in empirical data.经验数据中加权无标度网络的演化。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 May;77(5 Pt 2):056105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.056105. Epub 2008 May 16.
5
Preferential attachment in sexual networks.性网络中的优先连接。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 26;104(26):10762-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611337104. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
6
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.团队在知识生产中日益占据主导地位。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
7
Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks.生长网络中的聚类与优先连接
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Aug;64(2 Pt 2):025102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.025102. Epub 2001 Jul 26.
8
Emergence of scaling in random networks.随机网络中幂律分布的出现。
Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509.