• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扫视目标选择依赖于反馈竞争信号整合。

Saccade target selection relies on feedback competitive signal integration.

机构信息

Section Biophysics, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Doders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 17;33(29):12077-89. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2613-12.2013.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2613-12.2013
PMID:23864693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6794063/
Abstract

It is often assumed that decision making involves neural competition, accumulation of evidence "scores" over time, and commitment to a particular alternative once its scores reach a critical decision threshold first. So far, however, neither the first-to-threshold rule nor the nature of competition (feedforward or feedback inhibition) has been revealed by experiments. Here, we presented two simultaneously flashed targets that reversed their intensity difference during each presentation and instructed human subjects to make a saccade toward the brightest target. All subjects preferentially chose the target that was brightest during the first stimulus phase. Unless this first phase lasted only 40 ms, this primacy effect persisted even if the second, reversed-intensity phase lasted longer. This effect did not result from premature commitment to the initially dominant target, because a strong target imbalance in the opposite direction later drove nearly all responses toward that location. Moreover, there was a nonmonotonic relation between target imbalance and primacy: increasing the target imbalance beyond 40 cd/m(2) caused an attenuation of primacy. These are the hallmarks of hysteresis, predicted by models in which target representations compete through strong feedback. Reaction times were independent of the choice probability. This dissociation suggests that target selection and movement initiation are distinct phenomena.

摘要

人们通常认为决策涉及神经竞争,即随着时间的推移“分数”的积累,并在某个分数达到关键决策阈值时,就会做出特定的选择。然而,到目前为止,实验既没有揭示出先到阈值规则,也没有揭示竞争的性质(前馈或反馈抑制)。在这里,我们呈现了两个同时闪烁的目标,在每个呈现过程中改变它们之间的强度差异,并指导人类被试朝着最亮的目标进行扫视。所有被试都优先选择在第一个刺激阶段最亮的目标。除非这个第一阶段持续时间仅为 40 毫秒,否则这种优先效应会一直持续,即使第二个强度反转阶段持续时间更长。这种效应不是由于过早地对最初占主导地位的目标做出承诺,因为后来一个强烈的、相反方向的目标不平衡几乎导致所有反应都指向那个位置。此外,目标不平衡与优先性之间存在非单调关系:将目标不平衡增加到 40 cd/m(2)以上会导致优先性衰减。这些都是滞后的特征,这是通过强反馈竞争的模型所预测的。反应时间与选择概率无关。这种分离表明目标选择和运动启动是两个不同的现象。

相似文献

1
Saccade target selection relies on feedback competitive signal integration.扫视目标选择依赖于反馈竞争信号整合。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 17;33(29):12077-89. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2613-12.2013.
2
Changes to online control and eye-hand coordination with healthy ageing.健康衰老过程中在线控制及眼手协调能力的变化。
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Jun;59:244-257. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 May 7.
3
Linking express saccade occurance to stimulus properties and sensorimotor integration in the superior colliculus.将快速扫视的发生与上丘中的刺激特性和感觉运动整合联系起来。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Aug;114(2):879-92. doi: 10.1152/jn.00047.2015. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
4
The generation of secondary saccades without postsaccadic visual feedback.无扫视后视觉反馈时继发性扫视的产生。
J Vis. 2013 Apr 12;13(5):11. doi: 10.1167/13.5.11.
5
The effect of saccade metrics on the corollary discharge contribution to perceived eye location.扫视指标对视觉感知眼位置的推论性放电贡献的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 May 1;113(9):3312-22. doi: 10.1152/jn.00771.2014. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
6
Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades.预线索对自主和反射性扫视生成的影响。I. 对顺向扫视的反线索。
Exp Brain Res. 1998 Jun;120(4):403-16. doi: 10.1007/s002210050414.
7
A Trial-by-Trial Window into Sensorimotor Transformations in the Human Motor Periphery.对人类运动外周感觉运动转换的逐次试验观察窗口
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 3;36(31):8273-82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0899-16.2016.
8
Revisiting corrective saccades: role of visual feedback.重新审视矫正性扫视:视觉反馈的作用
Vision Res. 2013 Aug 30;89:54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
9
Motor intention activity in the macaque's lateral intraparietal area. I. Dissociation of motor plan from sensory memory.猕猴外侧顶内沟区的运动意图活动。I. 运动计划与感觉记忆的分离。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):1439-56. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.3.1439.
10
Sensory processing of motor inaccuracy depends on previously performed movement and on subsequent motor corrections: a study of the saccadic system.运动不准确的感觉处理取决于先前进行的运动和随后的运动校正:扫视系统的研究。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e17329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017329.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Failures in Perceptual Updating and the Severity of Psychosis in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症中知觉更新失败与精神病严重程度的关系。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 1;79(2):169-177. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.3482.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures.反应时间数据的统计模拟:单过程模型、参数可变性和混合。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Mar;2(1):20-54. doi: 10.3758/BF03214411.
2
Using Time-Varying Evidence to Test Models of Decision Dynamics: Bounded Diffusion vs. the Leaky Competing Accumulator Model.利用时变证据检验决策动态模型:有界扩散模型与泄漏竞争累加器模型
Front Neurosci. 2012 Jun 12;6:79. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00079. eCollection 2012.
3
Local computation of decision-relevant net sensory evidence in parietal cortex.顶叶皮层中决策相关净感觉证据的局部计算。
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Apr;22(4):903-17. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr165. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
4
Neural mechanisms of saccade target selection: gated accumulator model of the visual-motor cascade.扫视目标选择的神经机制:视觉-运动级联的门控累积器模型。
Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Jun;33(11):1991-2002. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07715.x.
5
Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence.使用非平稳证据测试多选项决策模型。
Front Neurosci. 2011 May 4;5:63. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00063. eCollection 2011.
6
Gain modulation by an urgency signal controls the speed-accuracy trade-off in a network model of a cortical decision circuit.紧迫感信号的增益调制控制皮质决策回路网络模型中的速度-准确性权衡。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Feb 11;5:7. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00007. eCollection 2011.
7
Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making.基于神经约束的感知决策建模。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1113-43. doi: 10.1037/a0020311.
8
Trial-to-trial variability of spike response of V1 and saccadic response time.V1 锋电位反应和眼跳反应时间的试验间变异性。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;104(5):2556-72. doi: 10.1152/jn.01040.2009. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
9
Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model.变化条件下的决策:紧急筛选模型。
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 16;29(37):11560-71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1844-09.2009.
10
Temporal integration of sensory evidence for saccade target selection.用于扫视目标选择的感觉证据的时间整合。
Vision Res. 2009 Nov;49(23):2764-73. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Aug 15.