• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用治疗获益率和治疗伤害率来描述治疗效果的异质性。

Treatment benefit and treatment harm rate to characterize heterogeneity in treatment effect.

作者信息

Shen Changyu, Jeong Jaesik, Li Xiaochun, Chen Peng-Sheng, Buxton Alfred

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, U.S.A.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2013 Sep;69(3):724-31. doi: 10.1111/biom.12038. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1111/biom.12038
PMID:23865447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3787989/
Abstract

It is well recognized that the conventional summary of treatment effect by averaging across individual patients has its limitation in ignoring the heterogeneous responses to the treatment in the target population. However, there are few alternative metrics in the literature that are designed to capture such heterogeneity. We propose the concept of treatment benefit rate (TBR) and treatment harm rate (THR) that characterize both the overall treatment effect and the magnitude of heterogeneity. We discuss a method to estimate TBR and THR that easily incorporates a sensitivity analysis scheme, and illustrate the idea through analysis of a randomized trial that evaluates the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in reducing mortality. A simulation study is presented to assess the performance of the proposed method.

摘要

众所周知,通过对个体患者进行平均来常规总结治疗效果存在局限性,即忽略了目标人群对治疗的异质性反应。然而,文献中几乎没有旨在捕捉这种异质性的替代指标。我们提出了治疗受益率(TBR)和治疗伤害率(THR)的概念,它们既可以表征总体治疗效果,又能体现异质性的程度。我们讨论了一种估计TBR和THR的方法,该方法很容易纳入敏感性分析方案,并通过对一项评估植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)降低死亡率的随机试验的分析来说明这一概念。我们进行了一项模拟研究来评估所提出方法的性能。

相似文献

1
Treatment benefit and treatment harm rate to characterize heterogeneity in treatment effect.用治疗获益率和治疗伤害率来描述治疗效果的异质性。
Biometrics. 2013 Sep;69(3):724-31. doi: 10.1111/biom.12038. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
2
Identification of subpopulations with distinct treatment benefit rate using the Bayesian tree.使用贝叶斯树识别具有不同治疗受益率的亚群。
Biom J. 2016 Nov;58(6):1357-1375. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500180. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
3
A non-parametric statistical test of null treatment effect in sub-populations.亚组人群中无效治疗效果的非参数统计检验。
J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Mar;30(2):277-293. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1636810. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
4
A review of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator trials.
Curr Opin Cardiol. 1998 Jan;13(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/00001573-199801000-00002.
5
Impact of programming strategies aimed at reducing nonessential implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.旨在减少不必要的植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的编程策略对死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;7(1):164-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001217. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
6
Potential cost-effectiveness of wearable cardioverter-defibrillator for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator explant in a high-income city of China.中国高收入城市中植入式心脏除颤器取出患者佩戴式心脏除颤器的潜在成本效益。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;30(11):2387-2396. doi: 10.1111/jce.14153. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator efficacy in patients with heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction (from the MADIT II population).植入式心脏复律除颤器对心力衰竭合并左心室功能不全患者的疗效(来自MADIT II研究人群)
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 15;95(12):1487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.021.
8
A Latin American registry of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the ICD-LABOR study.拉丁美洲植入式心脏复律除颤器注册研究:ICD-LABOR研究
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005 Oct;10(4):420-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.00060.x.
9
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Mortality in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.植入式心脏复律除颤器用于非缺血性心肌病患者一级预防死亡率的随机对照试验荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):659-665. doi: 10.1111/jce.13204. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
10
Do baseline characteristics accurately discriminate between patients likely versus unlikely to benefit from implantable defibrillator therapy? Evaluation of the Canadian implantable defibrillator study implantable cardioverter defibrillatory efficacy score in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial.基线特征能否准确区分可能从植入式除颤器治疗中获益与不太可能获益的患者?在抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器试验中对加拿大植入式除颤器研究的植入式心脏复律除颤疗效评分进行评估。
Am Heart J. 2001 Jan;141(1):99-104. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.111768.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling minimum clinically important difference for an individual and a population in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.厘清阿尔茨海默病治疗中个体和群体的最小临床重要差异。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 13;11(2):e70093. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70093. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
A likely responder approach for the analysis of randomized controlled trials.可能响应者分析方法在随机对照试验中的应用。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Mar;114:106688. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106688. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
3
Applying methods for personalized medicine to the treatment of alcohol use disorder.将个性化医学方法应用于酒精使用障碍的治疗。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;89(4):288-300. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000634.

本文引用的文献

1
Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.随机临床试验数据中的亚组识别。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2867-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.4322. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
2
Subgroup identification based on differential effect search--a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations.基于差异效应搜索的亚组识别——一种递归分区方法,用于建立患者亚组对治疗的反应。
Stat Med. 2011 Sep 20;30(21):2601-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.4289. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
3
Heterogeneity is not always noise: lessons from improvement.异质性并不总是噪音:来自改进的经验教训。
JAMA. 2009 Dec 16;302(23):2580-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1845.
4
A critical appraisal of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death.对植入式心脏复律除颤器预防心源性猝死治疗的批判性评价。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 30;52(14):1111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.058.
5
Risk stratification for primary implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.缺血性左心室功能不全患者植入心脏复律除颤器的风险分层
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.058.
6
Statistics in medicine--reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials.医学统计学——临床试验中亚组分析的报告
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 22;357(21):2189-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr077003.
7
Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification.将临床试验的总结结果应用于个体患者的局限性:风险分层的必要性。
JAMA. 2007 Sep 12;298(10):1209-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.10.1209.
8
The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.观察性研究因果效应的设计与分析:与随机试验设计的相似之处。
Stat Med. 2007 Jan 15;26(1):20-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.2739.
9
Assessing treatment effect heterogeneity in clinical trials with blocked binary outcomes.评估具有分组二元结局的临床试验中的治疗效果异质性。
Biom J. 2005 Oct;47(5):662-73. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200510157.
10
Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure.胺碘酮或植入式心脏复律除颤器用于治疗充血性心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043399.