• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳米填充树脂改性玻璃离子/硅氧烷或甲基丙烯酸酯基复合夹层II类修复体的微渗漏:同时粘结的影响

Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration: effect of simultaneous bonding.

作者信息

Shafiei F, Akbarian S

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):E22-30. doi: 10.2341/13-020-L. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

DOI:10.2341/13-020-L
PMID:23865583
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Microleakage of composite restorations at the cervical margin placed apically to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) is still a concern. This study evaluated the effect of simultaneous bonding application on cervical sealing of nano-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite open sandwich Class II restorations in the modified technique compared with that of conventional bonding.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 60 sound maxillary premolars, two standardized Class II cavities were prepared with cervical margins 1 mm below the CEJ. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups of 10 teeth each. In the first three groups (groups 1-3), Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil APX (Kuraray) were used for restoration in the total bonding technique (group 1), conventional open sandwich technique associated with a nano-ionomer (Ketac N100, 3M ESPE) (group 2), and modified open sandwich technique with simultaneous bonding application for both nano-ionomer and composite (group 3). In the second three groups (groups 4-6), Silorane Adhesive and Filtek Silorane composite (3M ESPE) were used in the same manner as in the first three groups, respectively.

RESULTS

The simultaneous bonding application in the modified sandwich restorations (with SE Bond or Silorane Adhesive) resulted in a significant reduction of the cervical microleakage compared with that of the conventional bonding (p<0.05). However, microleakage of the modified technique was similar to that of the total bonding (with SE Bond or Silorane Adhesive) (p>0.05), both showing good marginal seal.

摘要

目的

位于牙骨质釉质界(CEJ)根尖方向的复合树脂修复体颈部边缘的微渗漏仍是一个值得关注的问题。本研究评估了与传统粘结相比,在改良技术中同时应用粘结剂对纳米离子体/硅烷或甲基丙烯酸酯基复合树脂开放式夹层Ⅱ类修复体颈部封闭的效果。

方法和材料

在60颗健康的上颌前磨牙上制备两个标准化的Ⅱ类洞,颈部边缘位于CEJ下方1mm处。将牙齿随机分为六组,每组10颗。在前三组(第1 - 3组)中,使用Clearfil SE Bond和Clearfil APX(可乐丽公司)进行全粘结技术修复(第1组)、与纳米离子体(Ketac N100,3M ESPE)联合的传统开放式夹层技术修复(第2组)以及纳米离子体和复合树脂同时应用粘结剂的改良开放式夹层技术修复(第3组)。在后三组(第4 - 6组)中,分别以与前三组相同的方式使用Silorane Adhesive和Filtek Silorane复合树脂(3M ESPE)。

结果

与传统粘结相比,改良夹层修复体(使用SE Bond或Silorane Adhesive)同时应用粘结剂可显著减少颈部微渗漏(p<0.05)。然而,改良技术的微渗漏与全粘结(使用SE Bond或Silorane Adhesive)相似(p>0.05),两者边缘封闭效果均良好。

相似文献

1
Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration: effect of simultaneous bonding.纳米填充树脂改性玻璃离子/硅氧烷或甲基丙烯酸酯基复合夹层II类修复体的微渗漏:同时粘结的影响
Oper Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):E22-30. doi: 10.2341/13-020-L. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
2
Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.使用三种不同技术,比较基于低收缩硅氧烷的复合材料与基于甲基丙烯酸酯的复合材料修复II类乳牙龋洞后的微渗漏和剪切冲头粘结强度。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Winter;35(2):173-81. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.u6142007hj421041.
3
In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.采用两步酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀牙本质黏结系统对有和无衬层的后牙复合树脂微渗漏的体外比较。
Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):213-21. doi: 10.2341/10-215-L. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
4
Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities.II类洞型中不同类型复合树脂的聚合收缩以及有无垫底时的微渗漏情况
Oper Dent. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):325-31. doi: 10.2341/11-479-L. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
5
Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study.使用两种不同分层技术对II类洞形预备中基于硅烷的复合材料和基于甲基丙烯酸酯的复合材料进行微渗漏评估:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):148. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114943.
6
Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.术后漂白对不同延迟暴露于过氧化脲时期的树脂复合材料和树脂改性玻璃离子修复体边缘渗漏的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Nov 1;10(6):E009-16.
7
Gingival microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts.带有纤维桩的II类树脂复合材料修复体的牙龈微渗漏
Oper Dent. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):298-305. doi: 10.2341/06-86.
8
Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.II类开放式夹层修复体的颈部微渗漏:一项体外研究。
SADJ. 2011 Aug;66(7):320-4.
9
Influence of an intermediary base on the microleakage of simulated class II composite resin restorations.中间基底对模拟Ⅱ类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
Oper Dent. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):301-7. doi: 10.2341/12-210-L. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.可流动复合树脂、复合体和玻璃离子水门汀的牙本质粘结强度及微渗漏
Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):325-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00074.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Microleakage Evaluation of Two Methacrylate-Based Composites (GC Kalore and Luna SDI) in Class II Restorations: A Laboratory Study.两种甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料(GC Kalore和Luna SDI)在II类洞修复中的微渗漏评估:一项实验室研究。
Int J Biomater. 2022 Dec 28;2022:3835694. doi: 10.1155/2022/3835694. eCollection 2022.
2
Deep Margin Elevation: Current Concepts and Clinical Considerations: A Review.深部边缘抬高:当前概念与临床关注点:综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 18;58(10):1482. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101482.
3
Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin.
不同修复材料修复牙冠边缘边缘间隙时微渗漏的比较。
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 25;9:e10823. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10823. eCollection 2021.
4
Effect of Saliva Contamination on Microleakage of Open Sandwich Restorations.唾液污染对开放三明治修复体微渗漏的影响。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Sep;54(3):273-282. doi: 10.15644/asc54/3/5.
5
Microleakage of Aesthetic Restorations Following Functional Simulation and Immersion in Saudi-Traditional Mouth Rinses.在功能模拟及浸泡于沙特传统漱口水后美学修复体的微渗漏
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 11;7(21):3630-3633. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.694. eCollection 2019 Nov 15.
6
Evaluation of Enamel and Dentinal Microleakage in Class II Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorations Using Specific and Nonspecific Adhesives.使用特异性和非特异性粘合剂对Ⅱ类硅氧烷基和甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂复合材料修复体的釉质和牙本质微渗漏进行评估。
J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Jul;15(4):240-249.
7
Factors affecting marginal integrity of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.影响II类大块充填复合树脂修复体边缘完整性的因素。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017 Spring;11(2):101-109. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.019. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
8
A discussion on how to apply resin-modified glass ionomers.关于如何应用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的讨论。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):291-2. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.188538.
9
Effect of Adhesive Pretreatments on Marginal Sealing of Aged Nano-ionomer Restorations.粘结预处理对老化纳米离子修复体边缘封闭性的影响。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Summer;9(3):144-50. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.028. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
10
Microleakage of Class V Methacrylate and Silorane-based Composites and Nano-ionomer Restorations in Fluorosed Teeth.氟斑牙中Ⅴ类甲基丙烯酸酯和硅氧烷基复合材料及纳米离子体修复体的微渗漏
J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Jun;16(2):100-5.